Reconciling explanations for the evolution of evolvability

Abstract

Evolution’s ability to find innovative phenotypes is an important ingredient in the emergence of complexity in nature. A key factor in this capability is evolvability, or the propensity towards phenotypic variation. Numerous explanations for the origins of evolvability have been proposed, often differing in the role that they attribute to adaptive processes. To provide a new perspective on these explanations, experiments in this paper simulate evolution in gene regulatory networks, revealing that the type of evolvability in question significantly impacts the dynamics that follow. In particular, while adaptive processes result in evolvable individuals, processes that are either neutral or that explicitly encourage divergence result in evolvable populations. Furthermore, evolvability at the population level proves the most critical factor in the production of evolutionary innovations, suggesting that nonadaptive mechanisms are the most promising avenue for investigating and understanding evolvability. These results reconcile a large body of work across biology and inform attempts to reproduce evolvability in artificial settings.

Keywords

Evolvability evolutionary computation gene regulatory networks

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Azevedo

R. B.

Lohaus

Srinivasan

Dang

K. K.

Burch

C. L.

(2006). Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks. Nature, 440(7080), 87–90.

Bedau

M. A.

McCaskill

J. S.

Packard

N. H.

Rasmussen

Adami

Green

D. G.

…Ray

T. S.

(2000). Open problems in artificial life. Artificial Life, 6(4), 363–376.

Bergman

Siegal

M. L.

(2003). Evolutionary capacitance as a general feature of complex gene networks. Nature, 424(6948), 549–552.

Channon

(2006). Unbounded evolutionary dynamics in a system of agents that actively process and transform their environment. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 7(3), 253–281.

Ciliberti

Martin

O. C.

Wagner

(2007). Innovation and robustness in complex regulatory gene networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(34), 13,591–13,596.

Crombach

Hogeweg

(2008). Evolution of evolvability in gene regulatory networks. PLoS Computational Biology, 4(7), e1000112.

Daniels

B. C.

Chen

Y.-J.

Sethna

J. P.

Gutenkunst

R. N.

Myers

C. R.

(2008). Sloppiness, robustness, and evolvability in systems biology. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 19(4), 389–395.

Draghi

Wagner

(2009). The evolutionary dynamics of evolvability in a gene network model. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22(3), 599–611.

Earl

D. J.

Deem

M. W.

(2004). Evolvability is a selectable trait. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(32), 11,531–11,536.

10.

Ebner

Shackleton

Shipman

(2001). How neutral networks influence evolvability. Complexity, 7(2), 19–33.

11.

Fitzpatrick

M. J.

Feder

Rowe

Sokolowski

M. B.

(2007). Maintaining a behaviour polymorphism by frequency-dependent selection on a single gene. Nature, 447(7141), 210–212.

12.

Gigord

L. D.

Macnair

M. R.

Smithson

(2001). Negative frequency-dependent selection maintains a dramatic flower color polymorphism in the rewardless orchid Dactylorhiza sambucina (L.) Soo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(11), 6253–6255.

13.

Gomez

Miikkulainen

(1997). Incremental evolution of complex general behavior. Adaptive Behavior, 5(3–4), 317–342.

14.

Grefenstette

J. J.

(1999). Evolvability in dynamic fitness landscapes: A genetic algorithm approach. In Proceedings of the 1999 congress on evolutionary computation (Vol. 3).

15.

Ingolia

N. T.

(2004). Topology and robustness in the Drosophila segment polarity network. PLoS Biology, 2(6), e123.

16.

Kashtan

Alon

(2005). Spontaneous evolution of modularity and network motifs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(39), 13,773–13,778.

17.

Kashtan

Noor

Alon

(2007). Varying environments can speed up evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(34), 13,711–13,716.

18.

Kirschner

Gerhart

(1998). Evolvability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(15), 8420–8427.

19.

Lehman

Stanley

K. O.

(2008). Exploiting open-endedness to solve problems through the search for novelty. In Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on artificial life (ALIFE XI) (pp. 329–336).

20.

Lehman

Stanley

K. O.

(2011). Abandoning objectives: Evolution through the search for novelty alone. Evolutionary Computation, 19(2), 189–223.

21.

Lehman

Stanley

K. O.

(2013). Evolvability is inevitable: Increasing evolvability without the pressure to adapt. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e62186.

22.

Lehman

Stanley

K. O.

Miikkulainen

(2013). Effective diversity maintenance in deceptive domains. In Proceedings of the fifteenth annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation (pp. 215–222).

23.

Mouret

J.-B.

Doncieux

(2008). Incremental evolution of animats’ behaviors as a multi-objective optimization. In, From animals to animats10 (pp. 210–219). New York, NY: Springer.

24.

Palmer

M. E.

Feldman

M. W.

(2011). Spatial environmental variation can select for evolvability. Evolution, 65(8), 2345–2356.

25.

Pigliucci

(2008). Is evolvability evolvable?Nature Reviews Genetics, 9(1), 75–82.

26.

Reisinger

Miikkulainen

(2006). Selecting for evolvable representations. In Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation (pp. 1297–1304).

27.

Siegal

M. L.

Promislow

D. E.

Bergman

(2007). Functional and evolutionary inference in gene networks: Does topology matter?Genetica, 129(1), 83–103.

28.

Sniegowski

P. D.

Murphy

H. A.

(2006). Evolvability. Current Biology, 16(19), R831–R834.

29.

Spector

Klein

Feinstein

(2007). Division blocks and the open-ended evolution of development, form, and behavior. In Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation (pp. 316–323).

30.

Standish

R. K.

(2003). Open-ended artificial evolution. International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications, 3(2), 167–175.

31.

Steiner

C. F.

(2012). Environmental noise, genetic diversity and the evolution of evolvability and robustness in model gene networks. PloS One, 7(12), e52204.

32.

Urzelai

Floreano

(1999). Incremental evolution with minimal resources. In Proceedings of IKW99 (pp. 796–803).

33.

Von Dassow

Meir

Munro

E. M.

Odell

G. M.

(2000). The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature, 406(6792), 188–192.

34.

Wagner

(1996). Does evolutionary plasticity evolve?Evolution, 50(3), 1008–1023.

35.

Wagner

(2005). Robustness, evolvability, and neutrality. FEBS Letters, 579(8), 1772–1778.

36.

Wagner

(2008a). Neutralism and selectionism: A network-based reconciliation. Nature Reviews Genetics, 9(12), 965–974.

37.

Wagner

(2008b). Robustness and evolvability: A paradox resolved. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275(1630), 91–100.

38.

Wagner

G. P.

Altenberg

(1996). Perspective: Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution, 50(3), 967–976.