Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper presents an agent-based model that aims to replicate the social and sexual partnerships in real-world settings. This work is part of work in progress and aims to model the progression of HIV in a community. The model builds on existing models allowing for marriage, divorce and agent death. The main aim of this paper is to enhance the understanding of the evolution of social and sexual partnerships in a dynamically changing agent population. Agents are assigned attributes such as attractiveness, aspiration, courtship duration and sexual drive. Partnership formation is based on a likeability index which is calculated using age, aspiration and attractiveness.

Keywords

Agent-based model partnership formation social networks sexual networks

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adimora

A. A.

Schoenbach

V. J.

Doherty

I. A.

(2007). Concurrent Sexual Partnerships Among Men in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 97 No. 12, 2230–2237.

Adimora

A. A.

Schoenbach

V. J.

Taylor

E. M.

Khan

M. R.

Schwartz

R. J.

(2011). Concurrent Partnerships, Nonmonogamous Partners, and Substance Use Among Women in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 101 No. 1, 128–136.

Alam

S. J.

(2008). Understanding Social complexity in the Context of HIV/AIDS: A Case Study in Rural South Afica. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Manchester Metropolitan University Business School.

Alam

S. J.

Meyer

(2008). Comparing Two Sexual Mixing Schemes for Modelling the Spread of HIV/AIDS. Springer.

Alam

S. J.

Meyer

Norling

(2008). A model for HIV Spread in a South African Village. Proceedings of the Ninth International workshop on Multi-Agent Simulations.

Allan

(2006). Social networks and personal communities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Baumeister

R. F.

Catanese

K. R.

Vohs

K. D.

(2001). Is There a Gender Difference in Strength of Sex Drive? Theoretical Views, Conceptual Distinctions, and a Review of Relevant Evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 242–273.

Bergstrom

C. T.

Real

L. A.

(2000). Towards a theory of mutual mate choice: Lessons from two-sided matching. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 2, 493–508.

Bradford

Meston

C. M.

(2007). Senior sexual health: The effects of aging on sexuality. Innovations in clinical practice: Focus on sexual health, In VandeCreek

Peterson

F. L.

Bley

J. W.

(Eds.), 35–45.

10.

Budlender

Chobokoane

Simelane

(2004). Marriage patterns in South Africa: Methodological and substantive issues. Southern African Journal of Demography, 9(1), 1–26.

11.

Buss

D. M.

(2006). Strategies of Human Mating. Phychological Topics, 15, 239–260.

12.

Dailey

R. M.

Pfiester

Jin

Beck

Clark

(2009). On-again/off-again dating relationships: How are they different from other dating relationships. Personal Relationships, 16, 23–47.

13.

DeLamater

J. D.

Sill

(2005). Sexual desire in later life. Journal of Sex Research, 42:2, 138–149.

14.

DePaulo

B. M.

Morris

W. L.

(2005). Simngles in Society and in science. Phychological Inquiry, 16, 57–83.

15.

Dunbar

R. I. M.

(1992). Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. Journal of Human Evolution, 22(6), 469–493.

16.

Ferguson

S. J.

(2000). Challenging traditional marriage: Never married Chinese American and Japanese American women. Gender & Society, 14, 136–159.

17.

Fichtenberg

C. M.

Jennings

J. M.

Glass

T. A.

Ellen

J. M.

(2010). Neighborhood Socioeconomic Environment and Sexual Network Position. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 87 N0. 2, 225–234.

18.

French

R. M.

Kus

E. T.

(2008). KAMA: A Temperature-Driven MModel of Mate Choice Using Dynamic Partner Representations. Adaptive Behavior, 16(1), 71–94.

19.

Garcia

C. Y.

(1998). Temporal course of the basic components of love throughout relationships. Phychology in Spain, 2 Number 1, 76–86.

20.

Haidt

(2006). The HAPPINESS HYPOTHESIS. Basic Books.

21.

Helleringer

Kohler

H.-P.

(2007). Sexual Network Structure and the Spread of HIV in Africa: Evidence from LikomaIsland, Malawi. AIDS, 21 no. 17, 2323–2332.

22.

Hills

Todd

(2008). Population Heterogeneity and Individual Differences in an Assortative Agent-Based Marriage and Divorce Model (MADAM) Using Search with Relaxing Expectations. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 11.

23.

Hontelez

J. C.

Lurie

M. N.

Barnighausen

Bakker

Baltussen

Tanser

Hallett

T. B.

Newell

M.-L.

Vlas

S. J. de

. (2013). Elimination of HIV in South Africa through Expanded Access to Antiretroviral Therapy: A Model Comparison Study. PLOS Medicine, 10, 1–14.

24.

Huston

T. L.

Niehuis

Smith

S. E.

(2000). Courtship and the newlywed years: What they tell us about the future of a marriage. Revista de Psicologia Socialy Personalidad, 16, 155–178.

25.

Jin

E. M.

Girvan

Newman

M. E. J.

(2001). The structure of growing social networks. Physical review, 64 no. 4, 046132.

26.

Kalick

S. M.

Hamilton

T. E.

(1986). The matching hypothesis reexamined. . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(4), 673–682.

27.

Kalick

S. M.

Hamilton

T. E.

(1988). Closer look at a matching simulation: Reply to Aron. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(3), 447–451.

28.

Knittel

A. K.

Riolo

R. L.

Snow

R. C.

(2011). Development and evaluation of an agent-based model of sexual partnership. Adaptive Behavior, I-26.

29.

Lewis

K. G.

Moon

(1997). Always single and single agin women: A qualitative study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 23, 115–134.

30.

Louch

(2000). Personal network intergration: trasitivity and homophily in strong-tie relations. Social Networks, 22, 45–64.

31.

Lusher

Robins

(2012). Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks. Cambrige University Press.

32.

McPherson

Smith-Lovin

Cook

J. M.

(2001). Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.

33.

Morris

W. L.

DePaulo

B. M.

Hertel

Taylor

L. C.

(2008). Singlism: Another pproblem than has no name: Prejudice, stereotypes, and discrimination against ssingle. Hauppauge, NY:Nova Science.

34.

Palamuleni

M. E.

(2010). Recent Marriage patterns in South Africa 1996-2007. Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology, 7 Number 1, 47–70.

35.

Posel

Rudwick

(2013). Changing patterns of marriage and cohabitation in South Africa. Acta Juridica, 13, 169–180.

36.

Ramashwar

(2012). Remarriage, HIV Infection Linked Among Women In Sub-Saharan Africa. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38, 113–114.

37.

SADHS. (2003). South African Demographic and Health survey. Department of Health.

38.

Seme

Wirtu

(2008). Premarital Sexual Practice among School Adolescents in Nekemte Town, East Wollega. Ethiop.J.Health Dev., 22(2), 167–173.

39.

Sharp

E. A.

Ganong

(2011). ”I’m a Loser, I’m Not Married, Let’s Just All Look at Me”: Ever-Single Women’s Perceptions of Their Social Environment. Journal of Familiy Issues, 32, 956–979.

40.

Simao

Todd

(2003). Emergent Patterns of Mate Choice in Human Populations. Oxford university Press.

41.

Simao

Todd

P. M.

(2002). Modeling mate choice in monogamous mating systems with courtship. Adaptive Behavior, 10(X), 1–24.

42.

StatsSA

S. S. A.

(2010). Marriages and divorces.

43.

StatsSA

S. S. A.

(2011). Marriages and divorces.

44.

Sternberg

R. J.

(1986). A Triangular Theory of Love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135.

45.

Tazzyman

S. J.

(2010). Modelling the Evolution and Consequences of Mate Choice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University College London.

46.

Verzijden

M. N.

Lacnlan

R. F.

Servedio

M. R.

(2005). Famale mate-choice behavior and sympatric speciation. Evolution, 59(10), 2097–2108.

47.

Wilson

Smallwood

(2008). Age differences at marriage and divorce. Office for National Statistics, Summer 2008, 17–25.

Agent-based model for social and sexual partnerships formation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References