We respond to the commentaries by Hodgson and Lewis-Williams by clarifying the novelty of our theory. We argue that whenever Turing instabilities of neural activity play a role in generating visual hallucinations, they do more than shape the geometric patterns. Their relatively autonomous self-organization is a source of intrinsic value related to their self-maintenance as a pattern of activity, and they would also thereby decouple “higher-level” stages of neural processing from external stimulation, thus facilitating a more abstract mode of cognition. These additional features of our proposal support Hodgson and Lewis-Williams in their respective theories about the very first origins of human artistic activity. We also evaluate the critical literature regarding the possibility of ritualized enaction of altered states of consciousness (ASC) in early prehistory. We conclude that ASC were indeed possible, and suggest that they were likely involved in facilitating the social development of more symbolic forms of life and mind.
AkersB. P.RuizJ. F.PiperA.RuckC. A. P. (2011). A prehistoric mural in Spain depicting neurotropic Psilocybe mushrooms. Economic Botany, 20(10), 1–8.
2.
BahnP. G. (2010). Prehistoric rock art: Polemics and progress. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BeatonM. (2013). Phenomenology and embodied action. Constructivist Foundations, 8(3), 298–313.
4.
ButlerT. C.BenayounM.WallaceE.von DrongelenW.GoldenfeldN.CowanJ. D. (2012). Evolutionary constraints on visual cortex architecture from the dynamics of hallucinations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 109(2), 606–609.
5.
ClottesJ.Lewis-WilliamsD. (1998). The shamans of prehistory: Trance and magic in the painted caves. New York, NY: Harry N. Abrams.
6.
Di PaoloE. A.De JaegherH. (2012). The interactive brain hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(163), doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00163.
7.
DíazJ.-L. (2013). Salvia divinorum: A psychopharmacological riddle and a mind-body prospect. Current Drug Abuse Reviews, 6, 43–53.
8.
DronfieldJ. (1996). The vision thing: Diagnosis of endogenous derivation in abstract arts. Current Anthropology, 37(2), 373–391.
9.
FroeseT. (2012). From adaptive behavior to human cognition: A review of Enaction. Adaptive Behavior, 20(3), 209–221.
10.
FroeseT. (2013). Altered states and the prehistoric ritualization of the modern human mind. In AdamsC.WaldsteinA.SessaB.LukeD.KingD. (Eds.), Breaking convention: Essays on psychedelic consciousness (pp. 10–21). London, UK: Strange Attractor Press.
11.
FroeseT.Di PaoloE. A. (2011). The enactive approach: Theoretical sketches from cell to society. Pragmatics & Cognition, 19(1), 1–36.
12.
FroeseT.WoodwardA.IkegamiT. (2013). Turing instabilities in biology, culture, and consciousness? On the enactive origins of symbolic material culture. Adaptive Behavior, 21(3), 199–214.
13.
FroeseT.ZiemkeT. (2009). Enactive artificial intelligence: Investigating the systemic organization of life and mind. Artificial Intelligence, 173(3–4), 366–500.
14.
GuzmánG. (2005). Species diversity of the genus Psilocybe (Basidiomycotina, Agaricales, Strophariaceae) in the world mycobiota, with special attention to hallucinogenic properties. International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms, 7(1–2), 305–332.
15.
HelvenstonP. A.BahnP. G. (2003). Testing the ‘Three Stages of Trance’ model. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 13(2), 213–224.
16.
HelvenstonP. A.BahnP. G. (2004). Waking the trance fixed. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 14(1), 90–100.
17.
HelvenstonP. A.BahnP. G. (2005). Waking the trance fixed. Shelbyville, KY: Wasteland Press.
18.
HelvenstonP. A.HodgsonD. (2010). The neuropsychology of ‘animism’: Implications for understanding rock art. Rock Art Research, 27(1), 61–94.
19.
HenshilwoodC. S.d’ErricoF.WattsI. (2009). Engraved ochres from the Middle Stone Age levels at Blombos Cave, South Africa. Journal of Human Evolution, 57, 27–47.
20.
HodgsonD. (2006a). Altered states of consciousness and palaeoart: An alternative neurovisual explanation. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 16(1), 27–37.
21.
HodgsonD. (2006b). Understanding the origins of paleoart: The neurovisual resonance theory and brain functioning. PaleoAnthropology, 2006, 54–67.
22.
HodgsonD. (2014). Commentary on Turing instabilities and symbolic material culture by Froese, Woodward and Ikegami. Adaptive Behavior.
23.
HodgsonD.HelvenstonP. A. (2006). The emergence of the representation of animals in palaeoart: Insights from evolution and the cognitive, limbic and visual systems of the human brain. Rock Art Research, 23(1), 3–40.
24.
HubelD. H.WieselT. N. (1959). Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat’s striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 148, 574–591.
25.
KosentkaP.SpragueS. L.RybergM.GartzJ.MayA. L.CampagnaS. R.MathenyP. B. (2013). Evolution of the toxins Muscarine and Psilocybin in a family of mushroom-forming fungi. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e64646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064646
26.
Lewis-WilliamsD. (2002). The mind in the cave: Consciousness and the origins of art. London, UK: Thames & Hudson.
27.
Lewis-WilliamsD. (2014). Comment on: Froese et al.: ‘Turing instabilities in biology, culture, and consciousness’. Adaptive Behavior.
28.
Lewis-WilliamsD.ChallisS. (2011). Deciphering ancient minds: The mystery of San Bushman rock art. New York, NY: Thames & Hudson.
29.
Lewis-WilliamsD.DowsonT. A. (1988). The signs of all times: Entoptic phenomena in Upper Paleolithic art. Current Anthropology, 29(2), 201–245.
30.
Lewis-WilliamsD.PearceD. (2005). Inside the Neolithic mind: Consciousness, cosmos and the realm of the gods. London, UK: Thames & Hudson.
31.
MerabetL. B.MaguireD.WardeA.AlterescuK.StickgoldR.Pascual-LeoneA. (2004). Visual hallucinations during prolonged blindfolding in sighted subjects. Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology, 24(2), 109–113.
32.
NoëA. (2009). Out of our heads: Why you are not your brain, and other lessons from the biology of consciousness. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
33.
Reichel-DolmatoffG. (1978). Drug-induced optical sensations and their relationship to applied art among some Colombian indians. In GreenhalghM.MegawV. (Eds.), Art in society: Studies in style, culture, and aesthetics (pp. 289–304). London, UK: Duckworth.
SchaeferS. B. (1996). The crossing of the souls: Peyote, perception, and meaning among the Huichol indians. In SchaeferS. B.FurstP. T. (Eds.), People of the Peyote: Huichol indian history, religion & survival (pp. 138–168). Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
36.
ThompsonE. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
37.
VarelaF. J. (1997). Patterns of life: Intertwining identity and cognition. Brain and Cognition, 34(1), 72–87.
38.
WhitleyD. S. (2009). Cave paintings and the human spirit: The origin of creativity and belief. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
39.
ZellerA. (2007). ‘What’s in a picture?’ A comparison of drawings by apes and children. Semiotica, 2007(166), 181–214.
40.
ZubekJ. P.PushkarD.SansomW.GowingJ. (1961). Perceptual changes after prolonged sensory isolation (darkness and silence). Canadian Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 83–100.
