This article rigorously characterizes the structure of the entire fitness space of a simple neuromechanical system consisting of a model leg in closed-loop interaction with a neural controller. Using tools from the theory of piecewise-smooth dynamical systems, we derive expressions for the location and layout of the region of high-fitness solutions in parameter space, and we show how both the boundary and the internal structure of this region arise from specific neural, mechanical, and neuromechanical properties of the walking system. In addition, we characterize the structure of the map from neural parameters to gaits to fitness.
Beer, R.D. ( 1990). Intelligence as adaptive behavior: An experiment in computational neuroethology. New York: Academic Press.
2.
Beer, R.D. ( 1995a). A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction. Artificial Intelligence, 72, 173-215.
3.
Beer, R.D. ( 1995b). On the dynamics of small continuous-time recurrent neural networks. Adaptive Behavior, 3, 471-511.
4.
Beer, R.D. ( 2006). Parameter space structure of continuous-time recurrent neural networks. Neural Computation, 18, 3009-3051.
5.
Beer, R.D., Chiel, H.J., & Gallagher, J.C. (1999). Evolution and analysis of model CPGs for walking II. General principles and individual variability . Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 7, 119-147.
Brezina, V., Orekhova, I.V., & Weiss, K.R. ( 2000). The neuromuscular transform: The dynamic, nonlinear link between motor neuron firing patterns and muscle contraction in rhythmic behaviors . Journal of Neurophysiology, 83, 207-231.
8.
Chiel, H.J., Beer, R.D., & Gallagher, J.C. (1999). Evolution and analysis of model CPGs for walkingI. Dynamical modules. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 7, 99-118.
9.
di Bernardo, M., Budd, C.J., Champneys, A.R., & Kowalczyk, P. ( 2008). Piecewise-smooth dynamical systems: Theory and applications . New York: Springer.
10.
Di Paolo, E.A., Rohde, M., & Iizuka, H. ( 2007). Sensitivity to social contingency or stability of interaction? Modeling the dynamics of perceptual crossing. New Ideas in Psychology, 26, 278-294.
11.
Full, R.J., & Koditschek, D.E. (1999). Templates and anchors: Neuromechanical hypotheses of legged locomotion on land. Journal of Experimental Biology, 202, 3325-3332.
12.
Ghigliazza, R.M., Altendorfer, R., Holmes, P., & Koditschek, D. (2003). A simply stabilized running model. SIAM Journal of Applied Dynamical Systems, 2, 187-218.
13.
Gruau, F. ( 1994). Automatic definition of modular neural networks. Adaptive Behavior, 3, 151-183.
14.
Hatsopoulos, N.G. ( 1996). Coupling the neural and physical dynamics in rhythmic movements. Neural Computation, 8, 567-581.
15.
Holmes, P., Full, R.J., Koditschek, D., & Guckenheimer, J. (2006). The dynamics of legged locomotion: Models, analyses and challenges. SIAM Review, 48, 207-304.
16.
Izquierdo, E., & Buhrmann, T. ( 2008). Analysis of a dynamical recurrent neural network evolved for two qualitatively different tasks: Walking and chemotaxis. In S. Bullock, J. Noble , R. A. Watson, & M. A. Bedau (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Life (pp. 257-264). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
Johnson, S.D. ( 1994). Simple hybrid systems. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 4(6), 1655-1665.
18.
Koditschek, D.E., & Bühler, M. (1991). Analysis of a simplified hopping robot. International Journal of Robotics Research , 10, 587-605.
19.
Kodjabachian, J., & Meyer, J.-A. ( 1998a). Evolution and development of modular control architectures for 1D locomotion in six-legged animats. Connection Science , 10, 211-237.
20.
Kodjabachian, J., & Meyer, J.-A. ( 1998b). Evolution and development of neural controllers for locomotion, gradient-following and obstacle avoidance in artificial insects . IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 9, 796-812.
21.
Kuznetsov, Y.A. ( 2004). Elements of applied bifurcation theory (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.
22.
Pearson, K.G., Ekeberg, Ö., & Büschges, A. (2006). Assessing sensory function in locomotor systems using neuro-mechanical simulations. Trends in Neurosciences, 29, 625-631.
23.
Psujek, S., Ames, J., & Beer, R.D. ( 2006). Connection and coordination: The interplay between architecture and dynamics in evolved model pattern generators. Neural Computation , 18, 729-747.
24.
Sekerli, N., & Butera, R.J. ( 2005). Oscillations in a simple neuromechanical system: Underlying mechanisms. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 19, 181-197.
25.
Spencer, G. ( 1994). Automatic generation of programs for crawling and walking . In K. E. Kinnear, Jr. (Ed.), Advances in genetic programming (pp. 335-353). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
26.
Strogatz, S.H. ( 1994). Nonlinear dynamics and chaos. New York: Addison-Wesley.
27.
Sutton, G.P., Mangan, E.V., Neustadter, D.M., Beer, R.D., Crago, P.E., & Chiel, H.J. ( 2004). Neural control exploits changing mechanical advantage and context dependence to generate different feeding responses in Aplysia . Biological Cybernetics, 91, 333-345.
28.
Van der Schaft, A.J., & Schumacher, J.M. (2000). An introduction to hybrid dynamical systems. London: Springer-Verlag .
29.
Winters, J. M., & Crago, P. E., (Eds.). (2000). Biomechanics and neural control of posture and movement. New York: Springer.
