Resource competition acts at both the individual and the population levels. Stable dynamics result in a persistent system whereas unstable dynamics can result in extinction. This study explores how localized competition between individuals, over spatially distributed resources, influences exposure to predation. Using data from real-world experiments to inform a simulation, individual behaviors are linked to density-dependent population processes. The prominent emergent property is density-dependent exposure to predation. Depending on the population size and the availability of refugia, different aspects of the competitive behaviors drive the density-dependent effect. The results of the model provide a conceptual base for how specific interactions between individuals can bring about emergent population level processes.
Allen, L.J.S. ( 1983). Persistence and extinction in Lotka-Volterra reaction diffusion-equations. Mathematical Biosciences, 65(1), 1-12.
2.
Armstrong, J.D., & Griffiths, S.W. (2001). Density-dependent refuge use among over-wintering wild Atlantic salmon juveniles. Journal of Fish Biology, 58(6), 1524-1530.
3.
Barki, A., Karplus, I., & Goren, M. ( 1992). Effects of size and morphotype on dominance hierarchies and resource competition in the fresh-water prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii . Animal Behaviour, 44(3), 547-555.
4.
Claessen, D., Van Oss, C., de Roos, A.M., & Persson, L. ( 2002). The impact of size-dependent predation on population dynamics and individual life history. Ecology, 83(6), 1660-1675.
5.
Clark, K.L., Ruiz, G.M., & Hines, A.H. ( 2003). Diel variation in predator abundance, predation risk and prey distribution in shallow-water estuarine habitats. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 287(1), 37-55.
6.
Dingle, H., Highsmith, R.C., Evans, K.E., & Caldwell, R.L. (1973). Interspecific aggressive-behavior in tropical reef stomatopods and its possible ecological significance. Oecologia, 13(1), 55-64.
7.
Dorner, H., & Wagner, A. ( 2003). Size-dependent predator- prey relationships between perch and their fish prey. Journal of Fish Biology, 62(5), 1021-1032.
8.
Forrester, G.E., & Finley, R.J. ( 2006). Parasitism and a shortage of refuges jointly mediate the strength of density dependence in a reef fish. Ecology , 87(5), 1110-1115.
9.
Forsythe, P.S., Wyatt, D.S., & Switzer, P.V. ( 2003). Effects of experience and body size on refuge choice in the crayfish Orconectes immunis. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 18(2), 305-313.
10.
Fraser, D.F., Gilliam, J.F., Albanese, B.W., & Snider, S.B. ( 2006). Effects of temporal patterning of predation threat on movement of a stream fish: Evaluating an intermediate threat hypothesis. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 76(1), 25-35.
11.
Gardner, C., Frusher, S., Haddon, M., & Buxton, C. ( 2003). Movements of the southern rock lobster Jasus edwardshiin Tasmania, Australia. Bulletin of Marine Science, 73(3), 653-671.
12.
Goss-Custard, J.D., West, A.D., Stillman, R.A., Durell, S., Caldow, R.W.G., McGrorty, S., et al. (2001). Density-dependent starvation in a vertebrate without significant depletion. Journal of Animal Ecology, 70(6), 955-965.
13.
Gotceitas, V. ( 1990). Variation in plant stem density and its effects on foraging success of juvenile bluegill sunfish. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 27(1), 63-70.
14.
Grimm, V., Berger, U., Bastiansen, F., Eliassen, S., Ginot, V., Giske, J., et al. (2006). A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecological Modelling, 198(1-2), 115-126.
15.
Grimm, V., Berger, U., Deangelis, D.L., Polhill, J.G., Giske, J., & Railsback, S.F. (2009). The ODD protocol for describing individual-based and agent based models: A first update. Unpublished manuscript.
16.
Grimm, V., & Railsback, S.F. (2005). Individual-based modeling and ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
Hallam, T.G., Svoboda, L.J., & Gard, T.C. ( 1979). Persistence and extinction in 3 species Lotka-Volterra competitive systems. Mathematical Biosciences, 46(1-2), 117-124.
18.
Harvey, B.C., White, J.L., & Nakamoto, R.J. (2004). An emergent multiple predator effect may enhance biotic resistance in a stream fish assemblage. Ecology, 85(1), 127-133.
19.
Heck Jr., K.L., & Thoman, T.L. ( 1981). Experiments on predator-prey interactions in vegetated aquatic habitats. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 53, 125-134.
20.
Hixon, M.A., & Jones, G.P. ( 2005). Competition, predation, and density-dependent mortality in demersal marine fishes. Ecology, 86(11), 2847-2859.
21.
Holbrook, S.J., & Schmitt, R.J. ( 2002). Competition for shelter space causes density-dependent predation mortality in damselfishes. Ecology, 83(10), 2855-2868.
22.
Huston, M., Deangelis, D., & Post, W. ( 1988). New computer-models unify ecological theory - computer-simulations show that many ecological patterns can be explained by interactions among individual organisms. Bioscience, 38(10), 682-691.
23.
Ilheu, M., Acquistapace, P., Benvenuto, C., & Gherardi, F. ( 2003). Shelter use of the Red-Swamp Crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) in dry-season stream pools. Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie, 157(4), 535-546.
24.
Johnson, C.A., Giraldeau, L.-A., & Grant, J.W.A. ( 2006). Intensity of interference affects the distribution of house sparrows, Passer domesticus, at food patches. Animal Behaviour, 71(4), 965-970.
25.
Johnson, D.W. ( 2006). Predation, habitat complexity, and variation in density-dependent mortality of temperate reef fishes. Ecology, 87(5), 1179-1188.
26.
Kitchell, J.F., Eby, L.A., He, X., Schindler, D.E., & Wright, R.A. ( 1994). Predator-prey dynamics in an ecosystem context. Journal of Fish Biology, 45, 209-226.
27.
Lammers, J.H., Warburton, K., & Cribb, B.W. ( 2009a). Antipredator strategies in relation to diurnal refuge usage and exploration in the Australian freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium australiense . Journal of Crustacean Biology, 29(2), 175-182.
28.
Lammers, J.H., Warburton, K., & Cribb, B.W. ( 2009b). Diurnal refuge competition in the freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium australiense. Journal of Crustacean Biology , 29(4), 476-483.
29.
Lomnicki, A. ( 1980). Regulation of population-density due to individual-differences and patchy environment. Oikos, 35(2), 185-193.
30.
Lomnicki, A. ( 1988). Population ecology of individuals. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
Lozano-Alvarez, E., Briones-Fourzan, P., & Ramos-Aguilar, M.E. (2003). Distribution, shelter fidelity, and movements of subadult spiny lobsters (Panulirus argus) in areas with artificial shelters (Casitas). Journal of Shellfish Research , 22(2), 533-540.
32.
Main, K.L. ( 1987). Predator avoidance in seagrass meadows - prey behavior, microhabitat selection, and cryptic coloration. Ecology, 68(1), 170-180.
33.
Manatunge, J., Asaeda, T., & Priyadarshana, T. (2000). The influence of structural complexity on fish-zooplankton interactions: A study using artificial submerged macrophytes. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 58(4), 425-438.
34.
Minello, T.J., & Zimmerman, R.J. (1983). Fish predation on juvenile brown shrimp, Penaeus aztecus Ives: The effect of simulated spartina structure on predation rates. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 72, 211- 231.
35.
Primavera, J.H. ( 1997). Fish predation on mangrove-associated penaeids - The role of structures and substrate. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 215(2), 205-216.
36.
Rangeley, R.W., & Kramer, D.L. ( 1998). Density-dependent antipredator tactics and habitat selection in juvenile pollock. Ecology, 79(3), 943-952.
37.
Rodenhouse, N.L., Sherry, T.W., & Holmes, R.T. ( 1997). Site-dependent regulation of population size: A new synthesis . Ecology, 78(7), 2025-2042.
38.
Rossi, M.N., Reigada, C., & Godoy, W.A.C. ( 2006). The role of habitat heterogeneity for the functional response of the spider Nesticodes rufipes (Araneae: Theridiidae) to houseflies . Applied Entomology and Zoology, 41(3), 419-427.
39.
Sanchez, M.I., Green, A.J., & Alejandre, R. ( 2006). Shorebird predation affects density, biomass, and size distribution of benthic chironomids in salt pans: An exclosure experiment . Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 25(1), 9-18.
40.
Savino, J.F., & Stein, R.A. ( 1982). Predator-prey interaction between largemouth bass and bluegills as influenced by simulated, submersed vegetation. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 111(3), 255-266.
41.
Savino, J.F., & Stein, R.A. ( 1989a). Behavior of fish predators and their prey - Habitat choice between open water and dense vegetation. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 24(4), 287-293.
42.
Savino, J.F., & Stein, R.A. ( 1989b). Behavioral interactions between fish predators and their prey - Effects of plant-density. Animal Behaviour, 37, 311-321.
43.
Sih, A. ( 1992). Prey uncertainty and the balancing of antipredator and feeding needs. American Naturalist, 139(5), 1052- 1069.
44.
Singer, F.J., Harting, A., Symonds, K.K., & Coughenour, M.B. (1997). Density dependence, compensation, and environmental effects on elk calf mortality in Yellowstone National Park . Journal of Wildlife Management, 61(1), 12-25.
45.
Steger, R. ( 1987). Effects of refuges and recruitment on gonodactylid stomatopods, a guild of mobile prey. Ecology, 68(5), 1520-1533.
Utne-Palm, A.C. ( 2000). Prey visibility, activity, size and catchability’s (evasiveness) influence on Gobiusculus flavescens prey choice. Sarsia, 85(2), 157-165.
48.
Ware, D.M. ( 1973). Risk of epibenthic prey to predation by rainbow-trout (Salmo gairdneri). Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 30(6), 787-797.
49.
Werner, E.E., & Peacor, S.D. ( 2003). A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology, 84(5), 1083-1100.
