Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
2.
Banquet, J.P., Gaussier, P., Quoy, M., Revel, A., & Burnod, Y. (2005). A hierarchy of associations in hippocampo-cortical systems: cognitive maps and navigation strategies. Neural Computation, 17, 1339-1384.
3.
Beer, R.D. (2003). The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent. Adaptive Behavior, 11, 209-243.
4.
Braitenberg, V. (1984). Vehicles: Experiments in synthetic psychology . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Cisek, P. (2007). Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Science, 362, 1585-1599.
6.
Clark, A., & Thornton, C. (1997). Trading spaces: computation, representation, and the limits of uninformed learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 20, 57-66 [discussion 66- 90].
7.
Davison, M., & McCarthy, D. (1988). The matching law. Hills-dale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
DeAngelis, D. L., & Gross, L. J. (Eds.) (1992). Individual-based models and approaches in ecology: Populations, communities and ecosystems. Chapman & Hall.
9.
Di Paolo, E., Noble, J., & Bullock, S. (2000). Simulation models as opaque thought experiments . In M. A. Bedau, J. S. McCaskill, N. H. Packard, & S. Rasmussen (Eds.), Artificial Life VII: The Seventh International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2008). Models in science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition): http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/models-science/
11.
Grimm, V., & Railsback, S. (2005). Individual-based modeling and ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
Helbing, D., & Yu, W. (2009). The outbreak of cooperation among success-driven individuals under noisy conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 106, 3680-3685.
13.
Herrnstein, R.J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267-272.
14.
Izhikevich, E.M. (2003). Simple model of spiking neurons. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 14, 1569-1572.
15.
Krichmar, J.L., Seth, A.K., Nitz, D.A., Fleischer, J.G., & Edelman, G.M. (2005). Spatial navigation and causal analysis in a brain-based device having detailed cortical-hippocampal interactions. Neuroinformatics, 3, 197-222.
16.
Scheier, C., Pfeifer, R., & Kunyioshi, Y. (1998). Embedded neural networks: exploiting constraints . Neural Networks, 11, 1551-1569.
17.
Seth, A.K. (1998). Evolving action selection and selective attention without actions, attention, or selection. In R. Pfeifer, B. Blumberg, J. A. Meyer, & S. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (pp. 139-147). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
Seth, A.K. (2002). Competitive foraging, decision making, and the ecological rationality of the matching law. In B. Hallam, D. Floreano, J. Hallam, G. Heyes, & J. A. Meyer (Eds.), From Animals to Animats 7: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (pp. 359-368). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
Seth, A.K. (2007). The ecology of action selection: insights from artificial life. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Science, 362, 1545-1558.
20.
Seth, A.K. (2009). The strength of weak artificial consciousness . International Journal of Machine Consciousness, 1(1), 71-82.