Using hypersets as an analytic tool, we compare traditionally Gibsonian (Chemero 2003; Turvey 1992) and representationalist (Sahin et al. this issue) understandings of the notion `affordance'. We show that representationalist understandings are incompatible with direct perception and erect barriers between animal and environment. They are, therefore, scarcely recognizable as understandings of `affordance'. In contrast, Gibsonian understandings are shown to treat animal-environment systems as unified complex systems and to be compatible with direct perception. We discuss the fruitful connections between Gibsonian affordances and dynamical systems explanation in the behavioral sciences and point to prior fruitful application of Gibsonian affordances in robotics. We conclude that it is unnecessary to re-imagine affordances as representations in order to make them useful for researchers in robotics.
Barwise, J., & Etchemendy, J. (1987). The liar: an essay on truth and circularity. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Barwise, J., & Moss, L. (1996). Vicious circles. Stanford: CSLI.
4.
Bird, J., Layzell, P., Webb, A., & Husbands, P. (2003). Towards epistemically autonomous robots: Exploiting the potential of physical systems. Leonardo, 56, 109—114.
5.
Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. EcologicalPsychology, 15, 181—195.
6.
Chemero, A., & Turvey, M. (2007a). Hypersets, complexity, and the ecological approach to perception-action. Biological Theory, 2, 23—36.
7.
Chemero, A., & Turvey, M. (2007b). Autonomy and hypersets. BioSystems , published online doi:10.1016/j.biosystems. 2007.05.010.
8.
Clark, A. (1997). Being there. Cambridge: MIT Press.
9.
Duchon, M., & Warren, W. (1994). Robot navigation from a Gibsonian viewpoint. In IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 2272—2277. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
10.
Duchon, M., Warren, W., & Kaelbling, L. (1995). Ecological robotics: Controlling behavior with optical flow. In J. D. Moore & J. F. Lehman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 164—169). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11.
Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
12.
Kelso, J. (1995). Dynamic patterns. Cambridge : MIT Press. Kelso, J., & Engstrom, D. (2006). The complementary nature. Cambridge: MIT Press.
13.
Kugler, P., & Turvey, M. (1987). Information, natural law, and the self-assembly of rhythmic movement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14.
Kugler, P.N., Kelso, J.A.S., & Turvey, M.T. (1980). Coordinative structures as dissipative structures I. Theoretical lines of convergence. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 3—47.
15.
Kuniyoshi, Y., Yorozu, Y., Ohmura, Y., Terada, K., Otani, T., Nagakubo, A., & Yamamoto, T. (2004). From humanoid embodiment to theory of mind. In F. Lida, P. Pfeiffer, L. Steels, & Y. Kuniyoshi (Eds.), Embodied artificial intelligence . Springer: New York.
16.
Lewis, M., & Simo, L. (2001). Certain principles of biomorphic robotics. Autonomous Robotics, 11, 221—226.
17.
Lisitsa, A.P., & Sazonov, V. Yu. (1999). Linear ordering on graphs, anti-founded sets and polynomial time computability. TheoreticalComputer Science, 224, 173—213.
18.
Norman, D. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
19.
Rosen, R. (1991). Life itself. New York: Columbia University Press.
20.
Rosen, R. (2000). Essays on life itself. New York: Columbia University Press.
Slocum, A., Downey, D., & Beer, R. (2000). Further experiments in the evolution of minimally cognitive behavior: from perceiving affordances to selective attention. In J. Meyer, A. Berthoz, D. Floreano, W. Roitblat and S. Wilson (Eds.), From Animals to Animats 6: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior pp. 430—439.
23.
Stoffregen, T. (2003). Affordances as properties of the animal-environment system. EcologicalPsychology, 15, 115—134.
24.
Turvey, M. (1992). Affordances and Prospective Control: An outline of the ontology. EcologicalPsychology, 4, 173—187.
25.
Turvey, M.T. (2004). Impredicativity, dynamics, and the perception-action divide. In V. K. Jirsa, & J. A. S. Kelso (Eds.), Coordination dynamics: issues and trends. Vol.1 applied complex systems, pp. 1—20. New York: Springer Verlag.
