How Phonological Structures Can Be Culturally Selected for Learnability

Abstract

This paper shows how phonological structures can be culturally selected so as to become learnable and adapted to the ecological niche formed by the brains and bodies of speakers. A computational model of the cultural formation of syllable systems illustrates how general learning and physical biases can influence the evolution of the structure of vocalization systems. We use the artificial life methodology of building a society of artificial agents, equipped with motor, perceptual and cognitive systems that are generic and have a realistic complexity. We demonstrate that agents, playing the “imitation game,” build shared syllable systems and show how these syllable systems relate to existing human syllable systems. Detailed experiments study the learnability of the self-organized syllable systems. In particular, we reproduce the critical period effect and the artificial language learning effect without the need for innate biases which specify explicitly in advance the form of possible phonological structures. The ability of children agents to learn syllable systems is explained by the cultural evolutionary history of these syllable systems, which were selected for learnability.

Keywords

origins of speech evolution acquisition constraint phonetics phonology learnability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Archangeli, D. , & Langendoen, T. (1997). Optimality theory, an overview. Oxford: Blackwell .

Bailly, G. (1998). Learning to speak. Sensori-motor control of speech movements . Speech Communication, 22(2-3), 251–267 .

Brighton, H. , Kirby, S. , & Smith, K. (2005). Cultural selection for learnability: Three hypotheses underlying the view that language adapts to be learnable. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

Cangelosi, A. , & Parisi, D. (2002). Simulating the evolution of language. Berlin: Springer .

Chomsky, N. , & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper Row .

Christiansen, M. (2000). Using artificial language learning to study language evolution: Exploring the emergence of word order universals in language evolution. In J. Dessalles , A. Wray , & C. Knight (Eds.), Transitions to language (pp. 45–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press .

Cook, P. R. (1989). Synthesis of the singing voice using a physically parameterized model of the human vocal tract. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference(pp. 69–72), Columbus, OH.

de Boer, B. (2001). The origins of vowel systems(Oxford Linguistics Series). Oxford: Oxford University Press .

Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species. New York: The Penguin Press .

10.

Flege, J. (1992). Speech learning in a second language. In C. Ferguson , L. Menn , & C. Stoel-Gammon (Eds.), Phonological development: Models, research, implications(pp. 565–604). Timonium, MD: York Press .

11.

Gold, E. (1967). Language identification in the limit . Information and Control, 10, 447–474 .

12.

Guenther, F. (2003). Neural control of speech movements. In A. Meyer & N. Schiller (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities(pp. 209–239). Berlin: de Gruyter .

13.

Kaplan, F. (2001). La naissance d'une langue chez les robots. Paris: Hermes Science.

14.

Kirby, S. (2001). Spontaneous evolution of linguistic structure—an iterated learning model of the emergence of regularity and irregularity . IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 5(2), 102–110 .

15.

Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley .

16.

Lindblom, B. (1992). Phonological units as adaptive emergents of lexical development. In C. Ferguson , L. Menn , & C. Stoel-Gammon (Eds.), Phonological development: Models, research, implications(pp. 565–604). Timonium, MD: York Press .

17.

Long, M. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development . Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 251–285 .

18.

Lyon, R. (1997). All pole models of auditory filtering. In E. R. Lewis et al. (Eds.), Diversity in auditory mechanics(pp. 205–211). Singapore: World Scientific .

19.

MacNeilage, P. (1998). The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production . Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 499–548 .

20.

Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2001). The origins of syllable systems: an operational model. In J. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.). Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society(pp. 744–749). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .

21.

Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2005a). From holistic to discrete vocalizations: The blind snow-flake maker hypothesis(pp. 68–99). Oxford: Oxford University Press .

22.

Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2005b). The self-organization of speech sounds . Journal of Theoretical Biology, 233(3), 435–449 .

23.

Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2005c). The self-organisation of combinatoriality and phonotactics in vocalisation systems . Connection Science, 17(3), 1–17 .

24.

Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1989). Evolution, selection and cognition: from “learning” to parameter setting in biology and in the study of language . Cognition, 31, 1–44 .

25.

Pinker, S. , & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection . Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 13, 707–784 .

26.

Redford, M. A. , Chen, C. C. , & Miikkulainen, R. (2001). Constrained emergence of universals and variation in syllable systems . Language and Speech, 44, 27–56 .

27.

Rohde, D. , & Plaut, D. (1999). Language acquisition in the absence of explicit negative evidence: how important is starting small? Cognition, 72, 67–109 .

28.

Sakoe, H. (1982). Dynamic programming optimization for spoken word recognition . IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 26, 263–266 .

29.

Steels, L. (1997). The synthetic modeling of language origins . Evolution of Communication, 1, 1–35 .

30.

Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usagebased theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .

31.

Vihman, M. (1996). Phonological development: The origins of language in the child. Oxford: Blackwell .

32.

Vogt, P. (2003). Anchoring of semiotic symbols . Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 43(2-3), 109–120 .

33.

Zuidema, W. (2003). How the poverty of the stimulus solves the poverty of the stimulus. In S. T. Becker , & K. Obermayer (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15(Proceedings of NIPS'02) (pp. 51–68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .