A Biorobotic Investigation of Norway Rat Pups (Rattus norvegicus) in an Arena

Abstract

Biorobotics research typically focuses on simulating specific aspects of animal biomechanics, sensory systems, and computational abilities. We have developed a novel methodology for integrating the study of biorobotics and animal behavior. We describe several metrics for characterizing and comparing rat pup and robot behavior without presupposing behavioral goal states. In the rat pup and robot experiments, we found that when 10-day-old Norway rats (Rattus Norvegicus) are placed in an arena, they typically follow walls to a single corner and stay there. However, our thigmotaxic robots followed walls but typically circumnavigated the entire arena, contacting all corners, and exhibiting asymmetric corner behavior. After observing the latter behavior in robots, we found that rat pups also exhibited asymmetric corner behavior. Thus, our robotic experiments, while not quantitatively matching pup behavior, led to the discovery of a previously unrecognized pattern of behavior in rat pups. This illustrates the value of models in leading to discovery of new patterns of behavior in the system modeled. Our results also show that simple thigmotaxic architectures alone may not explain pup behavior in an arena.

Keywords

biorobotics autonomous robotics modeling animal behavior sensorimotor development Norway rat Rattus norvegicus control architecture

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altmann (1974). Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods . Behavior, 46, 227-265 .

Alberts, J. R. (1978). Sensory perceptual development in the Norway rat: A view toward comparative studies. In R. Kail & N. Spear (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on memory development (pp. 65-101), New York: Plenum .

Alberts, J. R. , Motz, B. A. , & Schank, J. C. (2004). Positive geotaxis in infant rats: A natural behavior and an historical correction . Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118, 123-132 .

Arkin, R. (1998). Behavior based robotics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .

Barnett, S. A. (1963). A study of behavior. London: Mehuen .

Braitenberg, V. (1984). Vehicles: Experiments in synthetic psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .

Brooks, R. A. (1986). A robust layered control system for a mobile robot . IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, RA-2, 14-23 .

Calhoun, J. G. (1962). The ecology and sociology of the Norway rat. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare .

Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .

10.

Frankel , & Gunn (1940). The orientation of animals: Kineses, taxes and compass reactions. Oxford: Clarendon .

11.

Gould, S. J. , & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 205, 581-598 .

12.

Joshi, S. , Schank, J. , Giannini, N. , Hargreaves, L. , & Bish, R. (2004). Development of autonomous robotics technology for the study of rat pups . In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 2860-2864 ).

13.

Schank, J. C. (2001). Beyond reductionism: Refocusing on the individual with individual-based modeling . Complexity, 6, 33-40 .

14.

Schank, J. C. , & Alberts, J. R. (1997). Self-organized huddles of rat pups modeled by simple rules of individual behavior . Journal of Theoretical Biology, 189, 11-25 .

15.

Schank, J. C. , & Alberts, J. R. (2000a). A general approach for calculating the likelihood of dyadic interactions: Applications to sex preferences in rat pups and agonistic interactions in adults . Animal Learning and Behavior, 28, 354-359 .

16.

Schank, J. C. , & Alberts, J. R. (2000b). The developmental emergence of coupled activity as cooperative aggregation in rat pups . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 267, 2307-2315 .

17.

Scholes, S. , Sendova-Franks, A.B. , Melhuish, C. , & Wilson, M. (2004). Evolution versus engineering—the collective intelligence of sorting; size matters . In T. Balch & C. Anderson (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on the Mathematics and Algorithms of Social Insects (pp. 153-160 ).

18.

Webb, B. (1995), Using robots to model animals: A cricket test . Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 16, 117-134 .

19.

Webb, B. , & Consi, T. R. (Eds.) (2001). Biorobotics: Methods and applications. Cambridge, MA: AAAI/MIT Press .

20.

Williams, D. I. , & Lee, M. H. (1979). Negative phototaxis and infantile handling in the rat . Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, p. 6 .

21.

Wimsatt, W. C. (1987). False models as means to truer theories. In M. Nitecki & A. Hoffman (Eds.), Neutral models in biology (pp. 23-55). Oxford: Oxford University Press .

22.

Wimsatt, W. C. , & Schank, J. C. (2004). Generative entrenchment, modularity, and evolvability: When genetic selection meets the whole organism. In G. Schlosser & G. Wagner (Eds.), Modularity in development and evolution (pp. 359-394). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press .