Bateson, P. (1988). The active role of behavior in evolution. In M. W. Ho & S. W. Fox (Eds.), Evolutionary processes and metaphors (pp. 191–207). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2.
Beer, R. D. (1996). Toward the evolution of dynamical neural networks for minimally cognitive behavior. In P. Maes, M. Mataric, J. A. Meyer, J. Pollack, & S. Wilson (Eds.), From Animals to Animats 4: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior(pp. 421–429). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
3.
Belovsky, G. E. (1978) Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore: the moose . Theoretical Population Biology, 14, 105–134 .
4.
Bredo, E. (1998) Evolution, psychology, and John Dewey’s critique of the reflex arc concept . Elementary School Journal, 98, 447–464 .
5.
Cherniak, C. (1994) Component placement optimization in the brain . Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 2418–2427 .
6.
Costall, A. (1993). How Lloyd Morgan’s canon backfired . Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 29, 113–122 .
7.
de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Evolutionary psychology: The wheat and the chaff . Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 187–191 .
8.
Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology . Psychological Review, 3, 357–370 .
9.
Dorner, D. (1996). The logic of failure. Cambridge, UK: Perseus Books .
10.
Ekstrom, A. D., Kahana, M. J., Caplan, J. B., Fields, T. A., Isham, E. A., Newman, E. L., & Fried, I. (2003). Cellular networks underlying human spatial navigation . Nature, 425, 184–188 .
11.
Freeman, W. J. (1997). Three centuries of category errors in studies of the neural basis of consciousness and intentionality . Neural Networks, 10, 1175–1183 .
12.
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
13.
Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Adaptive Thinking. New York: Oxford University Press .
14.
Gigerenzer, G. & Murray, D. J. (1987). Cognition as intuitive statistics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
15.
Gigerenzer, G. & Selten, R. (Eds.) (2001). Bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
16.
Gould, S. J. & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 205, 581–598.
17.
Griffiths, P. E. & Gray, R. D. (1994). Developmental systems and evolutionary explanation . Journal of Philosophy, 91, 277–304 .
18.
Jarvis, E. D., Smith, V. A., Wada, K., Rivas, M. V., McElroy, M., Smulders, T. V., Carninci, P., Hayashizaki, Y., Dietrich, F., Wu, X., McConnell, P., Yu, J., Wang, P. P., Hartemink, A. J., & Lin S. (2002). A framework for integrating the songbird brain .Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 188, 961–980 .
19.
Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The Origins of Order. New York: Oxford University Press .
20.
Levins, R. (1966). The strategy of model building in population biology . American Scientist, 54, 421–431 .
21.
Lewontin, R. C. (1982). Organism and Environment. In H. C. Plotkin (Ed.), Learning, Development, and Culture (pp. 151–170). New York: John Wiley & Sons .
22.
Lickliter, R. & Berry, T. D. (1990). The phylogeny fallacy: Developmental psychology’s misapplication of evolutionary theory . Developmental Review, 10, 348–364 .
23.
Mayr, E. (1983). How to carry out the adaptationist program? American Naturalist, 121, 324–334 .
24.
Oyama, S. (1985). The ontogeny of information. Durham, NC: Duke University Press .
25.
Oyama, S. (1993). Constraints and development . Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 43, 6–16 .
26.
Perry, G. & Pianka, E. R. (1997). Animal foraging: Past, present, and future . Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 12, 360–364 .
27.
Prigogine, I. (1971). Unity of physical laws and levels of description. In M. Grene (Ed.), Interpretations of life and mind: Essays around the problem of reduction (pp. 1–13). New York: Humanities Press .
28.
Pyke, G. H. (1984). Optimal foraging theory: A critical review . Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 15, 523–575 .
29.
Rapport, D. J. (1980). Optimal foraging for complementary resources . American Naturalist, 116, 324–346 .
30.
Reeve, H. K. & Sherman, P. W. (1993). Adaptation and the goals of evolutionary research . Quarterly Review of Biology, 68, 17–32 .
31.
Schank, J. C. (2001). Beyond reductionism: Refocusing on the individual with individual-based modeling . Complexity, 6, 33–40 .
32.
Schank, J. C. & Alberts, J. R. (2000). The developmental emergence of coupled activity as cooperative aggregation in rat pups . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 267, 2307–2315 .
33.
Schank, J. C. & Wimsatt, W. C. (2000). Evoluability: adaptation and modularity. In R. S. Singh (Ed.) Thinking about evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
34.
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice . Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118 .
35.
Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment . Psychological Review, 63, 129–138 .
36.
Tierney, A. J. (1983). The evolution of learned and innate behavior: Contributions from genetics and neurobiology to a theory of behavioral evolution . Animal Learning and Behavior, 14, 339–348 .
37.
Todd, P. M. & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Precis of simple heuristics that make us smart . Behavior and Brain Sciences, 23, 727–780 .
38.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1933). Modern Theories of Development. London: Oxford University Press .
39.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory. New York: George Braziller .
40.
Wagner, G. P. & Altenberg, L. (1996). Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution, 50, 967–976 .
41.
Webb, B. (2001) Can robots make good models of biological behaviour? Behavioral and Brain Sciences,23, 1033–1050 .
