A Lesson from Robotics: Modeling Infants as Autonomous Agents

Abstract

Although computational models are playing an increasingly important role in developmental psychology, at least one lesson from robotics is still being learned: Modeling epigenetic processes often requires simulating an embodied, autonomous organism. This article first contrasts prevailing models of infant cognition with an agent-based approach. A series of infant studies by Baillargeon (1986; Baillargeon & DeVos, 1991) is described, and an eye-movement model is then used to simulate infants' visual activity in this study. I conclude by describing three behavioral predictions of the eye-movement model and discussing the implications of this work for infant cognition research.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baillargeon, R. (1986). Representing the existence and the location of hidden objects: Object permanence in 6- and 8-month-old infants . Cognition, 23, 21-41 .

Baillargeon, R. (1999). Young infants' expectations about hidden objects: A reply to three challenges . Developmental Science, 2, 115-132 .

Baillargeon, R., & DeVos, J. (1991). Object permanence in young infants: Further evidence . Child Development, 62, 1227-1246 .

Bertenthal, B. I., Campos, J. J., & Kermoian, R. (1994). An epigenetic perspective on the development of self-produced locomotion and its consequences . Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 140-145 .

Haith, M. M. (1998). Who put the cog in infant cognition? Is rich interpretation too costly? Infant Behavior & Development, 21, 167-179 .

Held, R., & Hein, A. (1963). Movement produced stimulation in the development of visually guided behavior . Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56, 872-876 .

Mareschal, D., & French, R. M. (2000). Mechanisms of categorization in infancy . Infancy, 1, 59-76 .

Mareschal, D., Plunkett, K., & Harris, P. (1999). A computational and neuropsychological account of object-oriented behaviours in infancy . Developmental Science, 2, 306-317 .

Metta, G., Sandini, G., & Konczak, J. (1999). A developmental approach to visually-guided reaching in artificial systems . Neural Networks, 12, 1413-1417 .

10.

Munakata, Y., McClelland, J. L., Johnson, M. H., & Siegler, R. S. (1997). Rethinking infant knowledge: Toward an adaptive process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks . Psychological Review, 104, 686-713 .

11.

Nolfi, S., & Parisi, D. (1993). Self-selection of input stimuli for improving performance. In G. A. Bekey & K. Y. Goldberg (Eds.), Neural networks in robotics (pp. 403-418). Boston: Kluwer .

12.

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press .

13.

Schlesinger, M. (2001). Building a better baby: Embodied models of infant cognition . Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 139 .

14.

Schlesinger, M., & Barto, A. (1999). Optimal control methods for simulating the perception of causality in young infants . In M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 625-630 ). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

15.

Schlesinger, M., & Parisi, D. (2001). The agent-based approach: A new direction for computational models of development . Developmental Review, 21, 121-146 .

16.

Schlesinger, M., Parisi, D., & Langer, J. (2000). Learning to reach by constraining the movement search space . Developmental Science, 3, 67-80 .

17.

Simon, T. J. (1998). Computational evidence for the foundations of numerical competence . Developmental Science, 1, 71-78 .

18.

Smith, L. B. (1999). Do infants possess innate knowledge structures? The con side . Developmental Science, 2, 133-144 .

19.

Spelke, E. S. (1998). Nativism, empiricism, and the origins of knowledge . Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 181-200 .

20.

Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement learning: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .

21.

Thelen, E., Schöner, G., Scheier, C., & Smith, L. B. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching . Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 1-34 .