Organizational power ad politics researchers contend that the conflicts over scare resources intensify competition and conflict but can be useful for an effective distribution of resources. A total of 59 mars with budget responsibilities from both expanding and retrenching organizations were interviewed on specific budget conflicts. Consistent the power perspective. these conflicts could be productive. Open-minded discussion of opposing views contributed to making these conflicts useful for productivity, relationship development, and unity. In contrast with organizational power theorizing, cooperative goals, not competition, shaped the productive management of conflicts over scarce resources.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amson, A. C.
(1996). Distingishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams.. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123-148.
2.
Amason, A. C.
, & Sapienza, H. J. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflictJournal of Management, 23, 495-516.
3.
Avolio, B. J.
, Yammino, F. J., & Bass, B. M. (1991). Identifying common method variance with data collected from a single source. Journal of Management, 17, 571-587.
4.
Baler, W. K.
, & Sulsky, L M. (1992). Halo and perform applies research: A critical examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 975-985.
5.
Bender, P. M.
, & Wu, E.J.C. (1995). EQS for Macintosh user's guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software
6.
Bourgeois, L. J.
(1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6, 29-39.
7.
Clegg, S. R.
(1989). Radical revisions: Power, discipline and organizations. Organization Studies, 10, 97-115.
8.
Covaleskd, M. A.
, & Dirsmith, M. W. (1986). The budgetury process of power and politics. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 11, 193-214.
9.
Covaleski, M. A.
, & Dirsnith, M. W. (1988). The use of budgetary symbols in the political arena: An historically informed field study. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 13, 1-24.
10.
Covaleski, M. A.
, & Dirsmith, M. W. (1995). The preservation and use of public resources: Transforming the immoral into the merely factual. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 20, 147-173.
11.
Crompton, S. M.
, & Wagner, I. A., IH (1994). Percept-percept inflation in microorganization research: An investigation of prevalence and effectJournal of Applied Psychology, 79, 67-76.
12.
Dean, R. A.
, Fenis, K. R., & Konstans, C. (1988). Occupational reality shock and organizational commitment: Evidence from the accounting profession. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 13, 235-250.
13.
De Dreu, C.
, & van de Vliert, E. (Eds.). (1997). Using conflict in organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
de Lat Pau, B.
(1994). Matrix management of projects and power struggles: A case study of an R&D labtory. Human Relations, 47, 1089-1119.
15.
Deutsch, M.
(1973). The resolution of conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16.
Deutsch, M.
(1980). Fifty years of conflict In L Festinger (Ed.), Retrospections on social psychology (pp. 46-77). New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Eisenhardt K M.
(1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 543-576.
18.
Eisenhadt K. M.
, & Bourgeois, L. J., HII (1988). Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 737-770.
19.
Ezzamel, M.
(1994). Orgnizational change and accounting: Understanding the budgeting system in its organizational textOrganization Studies, 15, 213-240.
20.
Flana, I. C.
(1951). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 327-358.
21.
Flynm, G.
(1994). Executives point the finger at major tin waster. Personnel Journal, 73, 16.
22.
Fowler, F. J., Jr.
(1993). Survey research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
Frost, P. J.
, & Egri, C. P. (1990). Influence of political action on innovation: Part I. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 11, 17-25.
24.
Gordon, L. A.
, & Sellers, F. E. (1984). Accounting and budgeting systems: Te issue of congruency. Journal of Accounting & Public Policy, 3, 259-292.
25.
Hanlon, S. C.
, Meyer, D. C., & Taylor, R. R. (1994). Consequences of gainshairing: A field experiment revisitedGroup & Organizational Management, 19, 87-111.
26.
Janis, I. L.
(1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
27.
Johnson, D. W.
, & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction.
28.
Johnson, D. W.
, Johnson, R. T., & Maruyama, G. (1983). Interdependence and interpersonal attraction among heterogeneous and individuals: A theoretical formulation and a meta-analysis of the research. Review of Educational Research, 53, 5-54.
29.
Johnson, D. W.
, Maruyama, G., Johnson, R. T., Nelson, D., & Skion, S. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47-62.
30.
Knights, D.
, & Murray, F. (1992). Politics and pain in manage information technology: A case study from insurance. Organization Studies, 13, 211-228.
31.
Koberg, C. S.
(1987). Resource scarcity, environmental uncertainty, and adaptive organizational behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 798-807.
32.
Kramer, R. M.
, & Messick, D. M. (1995). Negotiation as a social process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
McGuire, J. B.
(1992). A qualitative analysis of dialectical processes in educational organizations. Human Relations, 45, 387-410.
34.
McKinley, W.
, Cheng, J.L.C., & Schick, A. G. (1986). Perceptions of resource criticality in times of resource scarcity: The case of university departments. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 623-632.
35.
Murphy, K. R.
, Jako, R. A., & Anhalt, R. L. (1992). Nature and consequences of halo error: A critical analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 218-229.
36.
Nottenburg, G.
, & Fedor, D. B. (1983). Scarcity in the environment: Organizational perceptions, interpretations and responses. Organization Studies, 4, 317-337.
37.
Ocasio, W.
(1994). Political dynamics and the circulation of power: CEO succession in U.S. industrial corporations, 1960-1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 285-312.
38.
O'Connor, K. M.
(1997). Motives and cognitions in negotiation: A theoretical integration and an empirical testInternational Journal of Conflict Management, 8, 114-131.
39.
Pfeffer, J.
(1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitnan Publishing.
40.
Pfeffer, J.
, & Moore, W. L. (1980). Power in university budgeting: A replication and extension. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 637-653.
41.
Pfeffer, J.
, & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
42.
Podsakoff, P. M.
, & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531-544.
43.
Richardson, A. J.
, & Gibbins, M. (1988). Behavioral research on the production and use of financial information. In K. R. Ferris (Ed.). Behavioral accounting research: A critical analysis (pp. 15-45). Columbus, OH: Century VII Publishing.
44.
Rosin, H. M.
, & Korabik, K. (1991). Workplace variables, affective responses, and intention to leave among women managers. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 317-330.
45.
Shah, P. P.
, & Jehn, K. A. (1993). Do fiends perform better an acquaintances? The interaction of friendship, conflict, and task. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2, 149-165.
46.
Spector, P. E.
(1987). Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 438-443.
47.
Spector, P. E.
, & Brannick, M. T. (1995). The nature and effects of method vaiance in organizational research. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 249-274). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
48.
Stearns, T. M.
, Hoffman, A. N., & Heide, J. B. (1987). Performance of commercial television stations as an outcome of interorganizational linkages and environmental conditions. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 71-90.
49.
Thompson, J. D.
(1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
50.
Tjosvold, D.
(1982). Effects of the approach to controversy on superiors' incorporation of subordinates' information in decision-making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 189-193.
51.
Tjosvold, D.
(1985). Implications of controversy research for managementJournal of Management, 11, 21-37.
52.
Tjosvold, D.
, & Field, R.H.G. (1984). Managers' structuring cooperative and competitive controversy in group decision making. International Journal of Management, 1, 26-32.
53.
Tjosvold, D.
, & Tjosvold, M. (1994). Cooperation, competition, and constructive controversy: Knowledge to empower for self-managing teams. In M. M. Beyedlein & D. A. Johnson (Eds.),Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams (Vol. 1, pp. 119-144). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
54.
Wayne, S. J.
, & Rubinstein, D. (1992). Extending game theoretic propositions about slack and scarcity in managerial decision making. Human Relations, 45, 525-536.
55.
Weick, K.
(1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
56.
Wilson, P. A.
(1995). The effects of politics and power on the organizational commitment of federal executives. Journal of Management, 21, 101-118.
