Over the past several years, much attention has been given to Bass and Avolio's notion of transformational leadership. However, there are striking similarities between Bass and Avolio's concepualization and several fundamental managerial practices. To examine this concern, we conducted a study that compared the transformational leadership scales from Bass and Avolio's Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) with four scales from Yukl's Managerial Practices Survey (MPS). The results provided mixed support for the distinctiveness of the MQ. A confirmatory factor analysis supported a distinction between the underlying constructs measured by the MLQ and MPS scales. In addition, a composite measure of transformational leadership did account for a significant proportion of variance in ratings of leader effectiveness, beyond that accounted for by the MPS scales. However, the proposed dimensionality of the MLQ was not supported, and the MLQ scales were highly related to the MPS scales.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Avolio, B. J.
, & Bass, B. M. (1995). individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 199-218.
2.
Avolio, B. J.
, & Howell, J. M. (1992). The impact of leader behavior and leader-follower personality match on satisfaction and unit performance. In K. E. Clark, M. B. Clark, & D. R. Campbell (Eds.), Impact of leadership. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
3.
Bass, B. M.
(1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
4.
Bass, B. M.
(1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18, 19-31.
5.
Bass, B. M.
, & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
6.
Bass, B. M.
, & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership: A response to critiques. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7.
Bass, B. M.
, & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Bennis, W. G.
, & Nanus, B. (1985). Lersae: The strategies for ting charge. New YorkHarper & Row.
9.
Bollen, K. A.
(1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
10.
Burns, J. M.
(1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
11.
Campbell J. P.
, Dunnette, M. D., Lawler, E; E., & Weick, K. E. (1970). Managerial behavior, performance, and effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
Fleishman, B. A.
(1953). The description of supervisory behavior. Personnel Psychology, 37, 1-6.
13.
Halpin, A. W.
, & Winer, B. J. (1957). A factorial study of the leader behavior descriptions. In R. M. Stogdill & A. E. Coons (Eds.), Leader behavior: Its description and measurement (pp. 39-51). Columbus: Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University.
14.
Hater, J. J.
, & Bass. B. (1988). Superiors' evaluations and subordinates' perceptions of transformational and transitional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 695-702.
15.
Hinkin, T. R.
, & Tracey, J. B. (1994). Transformational leadership in the hospitality industry. Hospitality Research Journal, 18, 49-63.
16.
House, R. J.
, & Mitchell, T. R. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership. Contemporary Business, 3, 81-98.
17.
Jöreskog, K. G.
, & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8.03. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
18.
Luthans, F.
, & Lockwood, D. L. (1984). Toward an observation system for measunng leader behavior in natural settings. In J. G. Hunt, D. Hosking, C. A. Schriesheim, & R. Stewart (Eds.), Leaders and managers: International perspectives on managerial behavior and leadership (pp. 117-141). New York: Pergamon.
19.
Mintzberg, H.
(1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.
20.
Morse, J. J.
, & Wagner, F. R. (1978). Measuring the process of managerial effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 23-35.
21.
Nunnally, J. C.
(1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
Schriesheim, C. A.
, Powers, K. J., Scandura, T. A., Gardiner, C. C., & Iankau, M. J. (1993). Improving construct measurement in management research: Comments and a quantitative approach for assessing the theoretical adequacy of paper-and-pencil survey-type instruments. Journal of Management, 19, 385-417.
23.
Seltzer, J.
, & Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational leadership: Beyond initiation and structure. Journal of Management, 16, 693-704.
24.
Stogdill, R. M.
(1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of the literature. New York: Free Press.
25.
Tichy, N. M.
, & Devanna, M. A. (1986). The transformational leader. New York: John Wiley.
26.
Yanmarino, F. J.
, & Dubinsky, A. J. (1994). Transformational leadership theory: Using levels of analysis to determine boundary conditions. Personnel Psychology, 47, 787-811.
27.
Yukl, G. A.
(1989). Leadership in organizations (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28.
Yukl, G. A.
(1990). COMPASS: The Managerial Practices Survey. New York: Author/Manus Associates.
29.
Yule, G. A.
(1994). Leadership in organizations (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30.
Yukl, G.A.
, Wall, S., & Lepsinger, R. (1990). Preliminary report on validation of the managerial practices survey. In K. E. Clark& M. B. Clark (Eds.), Measures of leadership (pp. 223-238). West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America.
