Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Although an emerging literature reports on the values, motives, competence, and activities of organization development (OD) practitioners, little is known about the explicit or implicit theories they bring to their client settings. This study attempts to shed light on OD practitioners' theoretical choices while bringing conceptual clarity and empirical refinement to an existing instrument. Practicing OD professionals responded to a theory orientation questionnaire. Data reveal practitioner preferences for humanistic theory sets (e.g., Herzberg and Maslow) and aversions to theory sets with a system-level focus (e.g., Likert, Lawrence and Lorsch, Levinson). Four meaningful factors proved more reliable and parsimonious an explanation of response patterns. The derived Components—Psychodynamics, Structure, Incentives, and Conflict—were conceptualized as practitioners' implicit model of organization. Limitations of this implicit model drive the authors' suggestion that a uniform, core knowledge base inform OD practice. Future uses of the reformulated scale are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Argyrs, C. (1962). Interpersonal competence and organizational effectiveness. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

Argyris, C. (1971). Management and organizational development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Argyris, C. , & Schon, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

At Emery Air Freight: Positive reinforcement boosts performance . (1973). Organizational Dynamics, 1(3), 41-67.

Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups. New York: Basic Books.

Burke, W. W. (1994). Organization development: A process of learning and changing (2nd ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley.

Burke, W. W. (1995). Organizational development: Then, now, and tomorrow. Organization Development Journal, 13(4), 7-18.

Burke, W. W. , & Litwin, G. H. (1992). A causal model of organizational performance and change. Journal of Management, 18, 523-545.

Church, A. H. , Burke, W. W. , & Van Eynde, D. (1994). Values, motives, and interventions of organizational development practitioners. Group and Organization Management, 19, 5-50.

10.

Comrey, A. L. (1973). A first course in factor analysis. New York: Academic Press.

11.

Eubanks, J. L. , O'Driscoll, M. P. , Hayward, G. B. , Daniels, J. A. , & Connor, S. H. (1990). Behavioral competency requirements for organizational development consultants. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 11, 77-97.

12.

Fagenson, E. A. , & Burke, W. W. (1990a). The activities of organization development practitioners at the turn of the decade of the 1990s. Group and Organization Studies, 15, 366-380.

13.

Fagenson, E. A. , & Burke, W. W. (1990b). Organization development practitioners' activities and interventions in organizations during the 1980s. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 26, 285-297.

14.

Hamilton, E. E. (1988). The facilitation of organizational change: An empirical study of factors predicting change agents' effectiveness. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 24, 35-59.

15.

Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland, OH: World.

16.

Herzberg, F. , Mausner, B. , & Snyderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: John Wiley.

17.

Lawrence, P. R. , & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business School.

18.

Lawrence, P. R. , & Lorsch, J. W. (1969). Developing organizations: Diagnosis and action. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

19.

Levinson, H. (1972a). The clinical psychologist as organizational diagnostician. Professional Psychology, 3, 34-40.

20.

Levinson, H. (1972b). Organizational diagnosis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

21.

Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper.

22.

Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper.

23.

Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill.

24.

Likert, R. (1967). The human organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.

25.

Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Brothers.

26.

O'Driscoll, M. P. , & Eubanks, J. L. (1993). Behavioral competencies, goal setting, and OD practitioner effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 18, 308-327.

27.

Osgood, C. E. , Suci, G. J. , & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

28.

Plovnick, M. S. , Fry, R. E. , & Burke, W. W. (1982). Organization development: Exercises, cases, and readings. Boston: Little, Brown.

29.

Porras, J. I. , & Hoffer, S. J. (1986). Common behavior changes in successful organization development efforts. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22, 477-494.

30.

Rioch, M. J. (1970). The work of Wilfred Bion on groups. Psychiatry, 33, 56-66.

31.

Shea, G. , & Berg, D. (1987). Analyzing the development of an OD practitioner. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23, 315-336.

32.

Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.

33.

Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.

34.

Tabachnick, B. G. , & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.

35.

Van Eynde, D. , Church, A. , Hurley, R. F. , & Burke, W. W. (1992). What OD practitioners believe. Training and Development, 46(4), 41-46.

Theory Orientations of Organization Development (OD) Practitioners

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References