Research on team gender and racial composition with respect to team effectiveness is reviewed. Published literature shows a dearth of studies on this issue in work organizations. The studies published suggest that teams with even slight variability on gender and race will be less positively evaluated. These suggestions are tested in a field setting, using 31 teams in a medium-sized state regulatory agency that were rated by team members and outside raters. Results showed that members of cross-functional project teams that vary with respect to gender or racial composition rate their team as less effective than members of homogeneous (all-male or all-White) teams. Ratings of external evaluators show no differences based on team composition. Antecedents and effects of these evaluations on female and minority team members are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blanchard, F. A.
, Adelman, L., & Cook, S. W. (1975). Effect of group success and failure upon interpersonal attraction in cooperating racial groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 1020-1030.
2.
Dyer, W. G.
(1987). Team building: Issues and alternatives (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
Ely, R. J.
(1994). The effects of organizational demographics social identity on relationships among professional women. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 203-238.
4.
Ely, R. J.
(1995). The power in demography: Women's social constructions of gender identity at work. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 589-634.
5.
Graen, G.
, & Cashman, J. F. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larsen (Eds.), Leadership frontiers (pp. 143-166). Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
6.
Hackman, J. R.
(1992). Group influences on individuals in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 199-267). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
7.
Hickson, D. J.
, Hinings, C. R., Lee, C. A., Schneck, R. E., & Pennings, J. M. (1971). A strategic contingencies theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 216-229.
8.
Hinings, C. R.
, Hickson, D. J., Pennings, J. M., & Schneck, R. E. (1974). Structural conditions of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 22-44.
9.
Hoffman, E.
(1985). The effect of race-ratio composition on the frequency of organizational communication. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 17-26.
10.
Hollenbeck, J. R.
, Ilgen, D. R., & Sego, D. J. (1994). Repeated measures regression and mediational tests: Enhancing the power of leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 5, 3-23.
11.
Johnston, W. B.
, & Packer, A. H. (1987). Workforce 2000: Work and workers for the 21st century. Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute.
12.
Kanter, R. M.
(1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
13.
Katzenbach, J. R.
(1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
14.
Kirchmeyer, C.
(1995). Demographic similarity to the work group: A longitudinal study of managers at the early career stage. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 67-83.
15.
Konrad, A. M.
, & Gutek, B. A. (1987). Theory and research on group composition: Application to the status of women and ethnic minorities. In S. Oskamp & S. Spacapan (Eds.), Interpersonal processes (pp. 85-121). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
Konrad, A.
, & Pfeffer, J. (1991). Understanding the hiring of women and minorities: How gender and ethnic segregation is produced and reproduced in organizations. Sociology of Education, 64, 141-157.
17.
Kraiger, K.
, & Ford, J. K. (1985). A meta-analysis of rater race effects in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 56-65.
18.
Mintzberg, H.
(1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19.
Mintzberg, H.
(1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
Mittman, B. S.
(1992). Theoretical and methodological issues in the study of organizational demography and demographic change. In P. Tolbert & S. B. Bacharach (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organization (Vol. 10, pp. 3-53). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
21.
Pfeffer, J.
(1983). Organizational demography. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 299-357.
22.
Ruhe, J.
, & Eatman, J. (1977). Effects of racial composition on small groups. Small Group Behavior, 8, 479-486.
23.
Sessa, V. I.
(1993, August). Why team demographics have an influence on team effectiveness: Conflict as a mediating variable. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA.
24.
Shaw, M. E.
(1981). Group dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
Shenhav, Y.
, & Haberfeld, Y. (1992). Organizational demography and inequality. Social Forces, 71, 123-143.
26.
Spangler, E.
, Gordon, M. A., & Pipkin, R. M. (1978). Token women: An empirical test of Kanter's hypothesis. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 160-170.
27.
Tsui, A. S.
, Egan, T. D., & O'Reilly, C. A. III. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549-579.
28.
Tsui, A. S.
, & O'Reilly, C. A. III. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402-423.
29.
Uhl-Bien, M. (1990). Teamwork of the future: An investigation of teamwork processes of professional work teams in knowledge-based organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati.
30.
Watson, W.
, Kumar, K., & Michaelsen, L K. (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on interaction processes and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 590-602.
31.
Wharton, A. S.
(1992). The social construction of gender and race in organizations. In P. Tolbert & S. B. Bacharach (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 10, pp. 55-84). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
32.
Wiersma, M.
, & Bird, A. (1993). Organizational demography in Japanese firms: Group heterogeneity, individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 996-1025.
