Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Only a few studies have examined the relationship between influence tactics and objectives, and the results were inconsistent. The present study employed two different research methods to determine how often people use nine influence tactics to attain five influence objectives with subordinates, peers, and superiors. One method was a survey on which managers reported their use of each tactic for each type of objective. The other method was a content analysis of incidents in which influence attempts in a variety of organizations were described from the perspective of the agent or target. The results showed that managers seek different things from subordinates, peers, and superiors. A different pattern of influence tactics was used for each type of influence objective, and the pattern varied by direction. Implications for managers were discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ansari, M. A. , & Kapoor, A. (1987). Organizational context and upward influence tactics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40, 39-49.

Erez, M. , & Rim, Y. (1982). The relationship between goals, influence tactics, and personal and organizational variables. Human Relations, 35, 871-878.

Erez, M. , Rim, Y. , & Keider, I. (1986). The two sides of the tactics of influence: Agent vs. target. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 25-39.

Falbe, C. M. , & Yukl, G. (1992). Consequences for managers of using single tactics and combinations of tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 638-652.

Hinkin, T. R. , & Schriesheim, C. A. (1990). Relationships between subordinate perceptions of supervisor influence tactics and attributed bases of supervisory power. Human Relations, 43, 221-237.

Kipnis, D. , Schmidt, S. M. , & Wilkinson, I. (1980). Intra-organizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one's way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440-452.

Kotter, J. P. (1982). The general managers. New York: Free Press.

Liden, R. C. , & Mitchell, I R. (1988). Ingratiatory behavior in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 13, 572-587.

Loether, H. J. , & McTavish, D. G. (1980). Descriptive and inferential statistics: An introduction. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

10.

Schilit, W. K. (1986). An examination of individual differences as moderators of upward influence activity in strategic decisions. Human Relations, 39, 933-953.

11.

Schmidt, S. M. , & Kipnis, D. (1984). Manager's pursuit of individual and organizational goals. Human Relations, 37, 781-794.

12.

Schriesheim, C. A. , & Hinkin, T. R. (1990). Influence tactics used by subordinates: A theoretical and empirical analysis and refinement of the Kipnis, Schmidt, and Wilkinson subscales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 246-257.

13.

Wayne, S. J. , & Ferris, G. R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 487-499.

14.

Yukl, G. , & Falbe, C. M. (1990). Influence tactics in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 132-140.

15.

Yukl, G. , Falbe, C. M. , & Youn, J. Y. (1993). Patterns of influence behavior for managers. Group & Organization Management, 18, 5-28.

16.

Yukl, G. , & Tracey, B. (1992). Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 525-535.

Influence Tactics Used for Different Objectives with Subordinates,Peers,and Superiors

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References