Team members with different levels of experience may understand the process of teamwork very differently and if these differences were identified, team training, team management, and team performance may be enhanced. In the present study, representations of teamwork knowledge as a function of team experience were investigated. Teamwork knowledge structures, or teamwork schemas, were assessed using multidimensional scaling and "freehand" concept maps. Consistent with contemporary expert-novice literature, the results revealed that higher experience team members conceptualized teamwork more concisely and in more abstract terms than did lower experience team members. In addition, results from the two methodologies converged to a greater degree for higher experience individuals than for lower experience individuals suggesting that higher experience individuals can express consistently what they understand about teamwork. The results suggested that team training should be designed based on trainees' prior team experiences and teamwork knowledge. Team managers might also keep in mind potential team members' experience levels when making team assignments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abelson, M. A.
, & Woodson, R. W. (1983). Review of research on team effectiveness: Implications for teams in schools. School Psychology Review, 12, 125-136.
2.
Anderson, J. R.
(1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369-406.
3.
Anderson, J. R.
(1987). Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problems. Psychological Review, 94, 192-210.
4.
Bartett, F. C.
(1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Bereiter, C.
, & Scardamalia, M. (1986). Educational relevance of the study of expertise. Interchange, 17, 10-19.
6.
Bettenhausen, K. L.
(1991). Five years of groups research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17, 345-381.
7.
Borko, H.
, & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Difference in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 473-498.
8.
Cannon-Bowers, J.
, & Salas, E. (1990, April). Cognitive psychology and team training: Shared mental models in complex systems. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Society for Industrial / Organizational Psychology, Miami Beach, Florida.
9.
Chi, M.T.H.
, Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. J. Steinberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp.7-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Chi, M.T.H.
, & Koeske, R. D. (1983). Network representation of a child's dinosaur knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 19, 29-39.
11.
Davison, M. L.
(1983). Multidimensional scaling. New York: Wiley.
12.
Dee-Lucas, D.
, & Larkin, J. H. (1988). Novice rules for assessing importance in scientific texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 288-308.
13.
Dyer, J. L.
(1984). Team research and team training: A state-of-the-art review. In F. A. Muckler (Ed.), Human factors review (pp. 285-323). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
14.
Eden, C.
(1988). Cognitive mapping. European Journal of Operational Research, 36, 1-13.
15.
Fandt, P. M.
(1991). The relationship of accountability and interdependent behavior to enhancing team consequences. Group & Organization Studies, 16, 300-312.
16.
Forgas, J. P.
(1981). Social episodes and group milieu: A study in social cognition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 77-87.
17.
Gist, M. E.
, Locke, E. A., & Taylor, M. S. (1987). Organizational behavior: Group structure, process, and effectiveness. Journal of Management, 13, 237-257.
18.
Gobbo, C.
, & Chi, M. (1986). How knowledge is structured and used by expert and novice children. Cognitive Development, 1, 221-237.
19.
Hanges, P. J.
, Braverman, E. P., & Rentsch, J. R. (1991). Changes in raters' perceptions of subordinates: A catastrophe model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 787-788.
20.
Hillerbrand, E.
, & Claiborn, C. D. (1990). Examining reasoning skill differences between expert and novice counselors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 68, 684-691.
21.
Jones, L. E.
, & Young, F. W. (1972). Structure of a social environment: Longitudinal individual differences scaling of an intact group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 108-131.
22.
Kelly, G. A.
(1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
23.
Larkin, J.
, McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208, 1335-1342.
24.
Leinhardt, G.
, & Greeno, J. G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 75-95.
25.
Leinhardt, G.
, & Smith, D. A. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 247-271.
26.
Levine, J. M.
, & Moreland, R. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
27.
Lingoes, J. C.
, & Schönemann, P. H. (1974). Alternative measures of fit for the Schonemann-Carroll matrix fitting algorithm. Psychometrika, 39, 423-427.
28.
Lord, R. G.
, Foti, R., & DeVader, C. (1986). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 343-378.
29.
Lord, R. G.
, & Maher, K. J. (1991). Cognitive theory in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1-62). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
30.
McCowen, P. D.
(1989, September). Teaching teamwork. Management Today, pp. 107-111.
31.
McNeese, M.
, & Zaff, B. (1991, September). Knowledge as design: A methodology for overcoming knowledge acquisition bottlenecks in intelligent interface design. Paper presented at the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting, San Francisco, California.
32.
McPherson, S. L.
, & Thomas, J. R. (1989). Relation of knowledge and performance in boys' tennis: Age and expertise. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 190-211.
33.
Mitchell, R.
(1986). Team building by disclosure of internal frames of reference. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22, 15-28.
34.
Noble, D. F.
(1989). Schema-based knowledge elicitation for planning and situation assessment aids. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 19, 473-482.
35.
Novick, L. R.
(1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 510-520.
36.
Owen, E.
, & Sweller, J. (1989). Should problem solving be used as a learning device in mathematics?Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 322-328.
37.
Payne, R.
(1990). The effectiveness of research teams: A review. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work (pp. 101-122). New York: Wldey.
38.
Poole, P. P.
, Gray, B., & Gioia, D. A. (1990). Organizational script development through interactive accommodation. Group and Organization Studies, 15, 212-232.
39.
Rentsch, J. R.
(1990). Climate and culture: Interaction and qualitative differences in organizational meanings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 668-681.
40.
Rentsch, J. R.
(1993, August). Predicting team effectiveness from teamwork schema similarity. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meetings, Atlanta, Georgia.
41.
Rentsch, J. R.
, & Duffy, L. T. (1991, August). Assessing meanings of teamwork. In M. Citera (Chair), Teamwork: Cognitive representations, accountability, and team decision making.Symposium conducted at a meeting of the American Psychological Association Meetings, San Francisco, California.
42.
Rentsch, J. R.
, & Howe, T. S. (1990). Cognitive representations of teams. (Final Report prepared for Universal Energy Systems, Inc., and Air Force Office of Scientific Research Summer Faculty Research Program, Contract No. F49620-88-C-0053). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.
43.
Salas, E.
, Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and ten training. In R. E. Swezey & S. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance, (pp. 3-29). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
44.
Salas, E.
, Montero, R. C., Glickman, A. S., & Morgan, B. B. (1988, August). Group development, teamwork skills, and training. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Meetings, Atlanta, Georgia.
45.
Schiffman, S. S.
, Reynolds, M. L., & Young, F. W. (1981). Introduction to multidimensional scaling: Theory, methods, and applications. New York: Academic Press.
Stone, E. F.
, & Gueutal, H. G. (1985). An empirical derivation of the dimensions along which characteristics of jobs are perceived. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 376-396.
48.
Sundstrom, E.
, DeMeuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.
49.
Trochim, W.M.K.
(1989). Introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12, 1-16.
50.
Walsh J. P.
, Henderson, C. M., & Dieghton, J. (1988). Negotiated belief structures and decision performance: An empirical investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42, 194-216.
51.
Ward, J. C.
, & Reingen, P. H. (1990). Sociocognitive analysis of group decision making among consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 245-262.
52.
Zaff, B. S.
, McNeese, M. D., Snyder, D. E., & Lizza, C. S. (1991, June). Integrated knowledge representations: Developing a large scale knowledge base for the pilot's associate. Paper presented at the Defense Advanced Research Program Agency Sponsored Associate Technology Symposium, Fairfax, Virginia.
