This study tested the consequences of a gainsharing plan both during its operation and after the group bonus component was eliminated. Using a longitudinal and experimental research design, changes in employees' attitudes, behaviors, and cognitions were measured. Three months after elimination of the group bonus, higher levels of moral commitment, prosocial behavior, and less intention to leave were observed in the experimental group than the control group. Implications for gainsharing theory and practice are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bowen, D. E.
, & Lawler, E. E. III. (1992). Total quality-oriented human resources management. Organizational Dynamics, 20(4), 29-41.
2.
Brief, A. P.
, & Motowildo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710-725.
3.
Bullock, R. J.
, & Lawler, E. E. II. (1984). Gainsharing: A few questions and fewer answers. Human Resource Management, 23(1), 23-40.
4.
Campbell, D. T.
, & Stanley, J. S. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Dalas, TX: Houghton Mifflin.
5.
Doyle, R. J.
(1983). Gainsharing and productivity: A guide to planning, implementation, and development. New York: AMACOM.
6.
Duncan, W. J.
(1989). Organizational culture: Getting a fix on an elusive concept. The Academy of Management Executive, 3(3), 229-236.
7.
Florkowski, G. W.
(1990). Analyzing group incentive plans. HRMagazine, 35(1), 36-38.
8.
Frost, C. F.
, Wakely, J. H., & Ruh, R. H. (1974). The Scanlon plan for organization development: Identity, participation, and equity. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
9.
Geare, A. J.
(1976). Productivity from Scanlon-typeplans. Academy of Management Review, 1(3), 99-108.
10.
Goodman, P. S.
(1973, August). The Scanlon plan: A need for conceptual and empirical models. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal.
11.
Gordon, G. G.
(1991). Industry determinants of organizationalculture. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 396-415.
12.
Gowen, C. R. III.
(1990). Gainsharing programs: An overview of history and research. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 11(2), 77-99.
13.
Graham-Moore, B. E.
, & Ross, T. L. (1983). Productivity gainsharing: How employee incentive programs can improve business performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14.
Graham-Moore, B. E.
, & Ross, T. L. (1990). Gainsharing: Plans for improving performance. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.
15.
Griffin, R. W.
(1988). Consequences of quality circles in an industrial setting: A longitudinal assessment. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 338-358.
16.
Hammer, T. H.
(1988). New developments in profit sharing, gainsharing, and employee ownership. In J. P. Campbell, R. J. Campbell, & Associates (Eds.), Productivity in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Hanlon, S. C.
, & Taylor, R. R. (1991). An examination of changes in work group communication behaviors following installation of a gainsharing plan. Group and Organization Studies, 16(3), 238-267.
18.
Hatcher, L.
, Ross, T. L., & Collins, D. (1989). Prosocial behavior, job complexity, and suggestion contribution under gainsharing plans. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 25(3), 231-248.
19.
Heneman, H., Jr.
(1979). Research roundup: Worker participation and productivity. Personnel Administrator, 24(4), 65-78.
20.
Joyce, W. F.
(1986). Matrix organization: A social experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 29(3), 536-561.
21.
Kaspin, J. A. (1990). Gainsharing in hospitals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University.
22.
Kilman, R. H.
, Saxton, M. J., & Serpa, R. (1986). Issues in understanding and changing culture. California Management Review, 28(2), 87-94.
23.
Lawler, E. E. III.
(1986). High-involvement management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Lawler, E. E. III.
(1988). Gainsharing theory and research: Findings and future research. In W. H. Pasmore & R. W. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 2). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
25.
Lawler, E. E. III
, & Mohrman, S. A. (1987). Quality circles: After the honeymoon. Organizational Dynamics, 15(4), 42-54.
26.
Leana, C. R.
, & Florkowski, G. W. (1992). Employee involvement programs: Integrating psychological theory and management practice. In G. Fenis & K. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 10). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
27.
Lesieur, F.
(Ed.). (1958). The Scanlon plan: A frontier in labor management cooperation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
Levine, D. I.
, & Tyson, L. D. (1990). Participation, productivity, and the firm's environment. In A. S. Blinder (Ed.), Paying for productivity (pp. 183-243). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
29.
McGregor, D.
(1958). The Scanlon plan through a psychologist's eyes. In F. G. Lesieur (Ed.), The Scanlon plan: A frontier in labor-management cooperation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
McGregor, D.
(1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
Meyer, J. P.
, Sampo, V., Paunonen, S. V., Gellatly, I. R., Goffin, R. D., & Jackson, D. N. (1989). Organizational commitment and job performance: It's the nature of commitment that counts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 152-156.
32.
Miller, K. I.
(1988). Cultural and role-based predictors of organizational participation and allocation preferences. Communication Research, 15(6), 699-725.
33.
Miller, K. I.
, & Monge, P. R. (1987). The development and test of a system of organizational participation and allocation. Organizational Communication Yearbook, 10, 431-455.
34.
Mohrman, A. M., Jr.
, Ledford, G. E., & Demming, S. (1987). Gainsharing: Congruence with high-involvement organization design (Working paper G 87-10 [101]). Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Center for Effective Organizations, School of Business Administration.
35.
Naff, K. C.
, & Pomerlau, R. (1988). Productivity gainsharing: A federal sector case study. Public Personnel Management, 17(4), 403-419.
36.
O'Dell, C.
(1987). People, performance, and pay. Houston: American Productivity Center.
37.
Penley, L. E.
, & Gould, S. (1988). Etzioni's model of organizational involvement: A perspective for understanding commitment to organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9(1), 43-59.
38.
Perry, N. J.
(1988, December). Here come richer, riskier pay plans. Fortune, 118(6), 50-58.
39.
Pitre, E.
, & Sims, H. P., Jr. (1987). The thinking organization: How patterns of thought determine organizational culture. National Productivity Review, 6(4), 340-347.
40.
Scheflen, K.
, Lawler, E. E. III, & Hackman, J. R. (1971). Long-term impact of employee participation in the development of pay incentive plans: A field experiment revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(3), 182-186.
41.
Schein, E. H.
(1981). Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture. Sloan Management Review, 22(2), 3-16.
42.
Schonberger, R. J.
(1992). Total quality management cuts a broad swath: Through manufacturing and beyond. Organizational Dynamics, 20(4), 16-27.
43.
Schuster, M. H.
(1984). The Scanlon plan: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 20(1), 20-28.
44.
Seashore, S. E.
, Lawler, E. E. III, Mirvis, P., & Cammann, E. (Eds.). (1982). Observing and measuring organizational change: A guide to field practice. New York: Wiley.
45.
Shultz, G.
(1958). Variations in environment and the Scanlon plan. In F. Leisieur (Ed.), The Scanlon plan: A frontier in labor-management cooperation (pp. 100-108). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46.
White, J. K.
(1979). The Scanlon plan: Causes and correlates of success. Academy of Management Journal, 22(2), 292-312.
47.
Whyte, W.
(1955). Money and motivation: An analysis of incentives in industry. New York: Harper.
48.
Wilkins, A. L.
, & Bristow, N. J. (1987). For successful organizational culture, honor your past. Academy of Management Executive, 1(3), 221-229.
49.
Wren, D. A.
(1987). The evolution of management thought (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
