The study examines a relationship that links accountability and interdependent behavior to enhanced team consequences. The high-accountability teams relied on more interdependent behaviors, experienced greater satisfaction with their team, and expressed higher success than low-accountability teams. Implications for practicing managers and for strengthening training programs are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ben-Yoav, O., & Pruitt, D. (1984). Accountability to constituents: A two-edged sword . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 283-295.
2.
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
3.
DeStephen, R., & Hirokawa, R. (1988). Small group consensus: Stability of group support of the decision, task process, and group relationships. Small Group Behavior, 19, 227-239.
4.
Fandt, P., Richardson, W., & Conner, H. (1990). The impact of goal setting on the simulation experience . Simulation & Games, 21, 409-420.
5.
Filley, A. (1975). Interpersonal conflict resolution. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
6.
Giacalone, R., & Rosenfeld, P. (1987). Impression management concerns and reinforcement interventions. Group & Organization Studies, 12, 445-453.
7.
Gist, M., Locke, E., & Taylor, S. (1987). Organizational behavior: Group structure, process, and effectiveness. Journal of Management, 13, 237-257.
8.
Hackman, R., & Walton, R. (1985). The leadership of groups in organizations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
Harkness, A., DeBono, K., & Borgida, E. (1985). Personal involvement and strategies for making contingency judgements: A stake in the dating game makes a difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 22-32.
10.
Hirokawa, R. (1983). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness: II. An exploratory investigation of procedural functions. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 59-74.
11.
Larson, C., & LaFasto, F. (1989). Teamwork: What must go right/what can go wrong . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Kerlinger, K. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
13.
McAllister, P., Beach, R., & Mitchell, T. (1979). The contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance , 24, 228-224.
14.
Meixner, W., & Welker, R. (1988). Judgment consensus and auditor experience: An examination of organizational relations. Accounting Review , 63, 505-513.
15.
Miller, D. (1983). Handbook of research design and social measurement . New York: Longman.
16.
Newman, E., & Turem, J. (1974, January). The crisis of accountability. Social Work, pp. 5-16.
17.
Reddy, W., & Byrnes, A. (1972). The effects of interpersonal group composition on the problem-solving behavior of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 516-517.
18.
Reich, R. (1987). Tale of a new America. New York: Time Books.
19.
Showers, C., & Cantor, N. (1985). Social cognition: A look at motivated strategies . Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 275-305.
20.
Slavin, R. (1988). Cooperative learning and student achievement. Educational Leadership, 46, 31-33.
21.
Slocum, J., & Sims, H. (1980). A typology for integrating technology, organization, and job design. Human Relations, 33, 193-212.
22.
Tetlock, P. (1983). Accountability and the complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.
23.
Tetlock, P. (1985). Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. In B. Staw & L. Cummings, (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 297-332). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
24.
Tetlock, P., & Kim, J. (1987) Accountability and judgement processes in a personal ity prediction task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 52, 700-709.
25.
Tyson-Bernstein, H. (1988, September). Accountability gets lost in the details . Education Digest, pp. 36-37.
26.
Watson, W., & Michaelsen, L. (1988). Group interaction behaviors that affect group performance on an intellective task. Group & Organization Studies, 13, 495-516.
27.
Woodman, R. (1978). Effects of team development intervention: A field experiment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University , West Lafayette, IN.
28.
Yarnold, P., Mueser, K., & Lyons, J. (1988). Type A behavior, accountability, and work rate in small groups. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 353-360.
29.
Yetton, P., & Bottger, P. (1982). The relationships among group size, member ability, social decision schemes, and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 145-159.
