The present research employed a correlational-design laboratory study to examine the initial-interaction component of a developmental model of Graen's leader-member exchange theory of leadership proposed by Dienesch and Liden (1986). The influence of ability, liking, and the three upward-influence tactics of ingratiation, assertiveness, and rationality on the quality of leader-member exchange was examined both from the perspective of group leaders and members. The 188 subjects were assigned to groups of 4 (a leader and 3 members). From the leader's perspective, liking for members and ability of members were the variables most consistently related to quality of leader-member exchange. From the member's perspective, all variables except self-assessed ability were related to quality of leader-member exchange. The differences in perspective between leaders and members are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, E.R., & Wilkins, R.D. (1982). Performance rating validity: The relationship of objective and subjective measures of performance. Group & Organization Studies, 7, 485-496.
2.
Cardy, R.L., & Dobbins, G.H. (1986). Affect and appraisal accuracy: Liking as an integral dimension in evaluating performance. Journal of Applied Psychology , 71, 672-678.
3.
Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W.J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46-78.
4.
Dienesch, R.M., & Liden, R.C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review , 11, 618-634.
5.
Dipboye, R.L. (1985). Some neglected variables in research on discrimination in appraisals. Academy of Management Review, 10, 116-127.
6.
Dipboye, R.L., & Flanagan, M.F. (1979). Research settings in industrial and organizational psychology: Are findings in the field more generalizable than in the laboratory? American Psychologist, 32, 141-150.
7.
Duchon, D., Green, S.G., & Taber, T.D. (1986). Vertical dyad linkage: A longitudinal assessment of antecedents, measures, and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 56-60.
8.
Feldman, J.M. (1981). Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 127-148.
9.
French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research .
10.
Graen, G. (1976). Role-making processes within complex organizations . In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1201-1245). Chicago: Rand McNally.
11.
Graen, G., & Cashman, J.F. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership frontiers (pp. 143-165). Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
12.
Graen, G., Novak, M.A., & Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 109-131.
13.
Herold, D.M. (1977). Two-way influence processes in leader-follower dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 224-237.
14.
Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S.M., & Wilkinson, I. (1980). Interorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one's way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440-452.
15.
Liden, R.C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 451-465.
16.
Mitchell, T., Green, S., & Wood, R. (1981). An attributional model of leadership and the poor performing subordinate: Development and validation. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 197-234). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
17.
Mook, D.G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38, 379-387.
18.
Moreland, R.L., & Zajonc, R.B. (1977). Is stimulus recognition a necessary condition for the occurrence of exposure effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35,191-199.
19.
Nisbett, R.E., & Wilson, T.D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 35, 250-256.
20.
Porter, L.W., Allen, R.W., & Angle, H.L. (1981). The politics of upward influence in organizations . In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 109-149). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
21.
Ritchie, J.B., & Thompson, P. (1980). Organization and people: Readings, cases and exercises in organizational behavior (2nd ed.). New York: West.
22.
Rubin, Z. (1973). Liking and loving: An invitation to social psychology . New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
23.
Scandura, T.A., & Graen, G.B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69,428-436.
24.
Schilit, W.K., & Locke, E.A. (1982). A study of upward influence in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 304-316.
25.
Steiner, D.D., & Dobbins, G.H. (1989). The role of work values in leaders' attributions and the development of leader-member exchanges. International Journal of Management, 6, 81-90.
26.
Wilson, W.R.K., & Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207, 557-558.
27.
Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences . American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.
