This study examines the relationship between the techniques of upward influence used by administrators, their motivational needs, and the way they view their supervisors' leadership styles. Subjects of the study were 144 randomly selected heads of departments at two-year and four-year higher educational institutions. Methods used by department heads to influence their supervisors include reason, coalition, higher authority, bargaining, friendliness, and assertiveness. Results showed that reason and coalition were the most prevalent methods, and there was a relationship between need for achievement, perceived initiation of structure, and the use of these two methods. Results also suggest that subordinates are more likely to use assertiveness and higher authority to influence supervisors who exhibit leadership styles that are low in initiation of structure and low in consideration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Hotel and Motel Association. (1986 ). Directory ofhospitality educators. East Lansing, MI: Author.
2.
Bass, B.M. (1981). Stodgill's handbook of leadership (rev. ed.). New York: Free Press.
3.
Bowers, D.G. (1976). Systems of organizations: Management of the human resource. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
4.
Cartwright, D. (1965). Influence, leadership and control. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 1-47). Chicago: Rand McNally.
5.
Cobb, A.T. (1986). Informal influence in the formal organization: Psychological and situational correlates. Group & Organization Studies, 11, 229-253.
6.
Cheng, J.L. (1983). Organizational context and upward influence: An experimental study of the use of power tactics. Group & Organization Studies, 8, 337-355.
7.
Gabarro, J.J. (1979). Socialization at the top: How CEO's and subordinates evolve interpersonal contracts. Organizational Dynamics, 7, 3-23.
8.
Gabarro, J.J., & Kotter, J.P. (1980). Managing your boss. Harvard Business Review, 58, 92-100.
9.
Halpin, A.W., & Winer, B.J. (1957). A factorial study of the leader behavior descriptions . In R. M. Stodgill & A. E. Coons (Eds.), Leader behavior: Its description and measurement (pp. 39-51). Columbus: Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research.
10.
Kanter, R.M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
11.
Kipnis, D. (1974). The powerholder. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Perspectives on social power (pp. 82-122). Chicago: Aldine.
12.
Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S.M. (1982). Profiles of organizational influence strategies (Form M. San Diego, CA: University Associates.
13.
Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S.M. (1984). Managers' pursuit of individual and organizational goals. Human Relations, 37(10), 781-794.
14.
Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S.M., Swaffin-Smith, C., & Wilkinson, I. (1984). Patterns of managerial influence: Shotgun managers, tacticians, and bystanders. Organizational Dynamics, 12(3), 58-67.
15.
Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S.M., & Wilkinson, I. (1980). Intra-organizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one's way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440-452.
16.
Levine, M.S. (1977). Canonical analysis and factor comparison. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17.
Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
Miller, J.A. (1973). A hierarchical structure of leadership behaviors (Tech. Rep. No. 66). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester, Management Research Center.
19.
Mowday, R. (1978). The exercise of upward influence in organizations . Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 137-156.
Pelz, D.C. (1952). Influence: A key to effective leadership in the first-line supervisor. Personnel, 29, 3-11.
22.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R. (1974). Organizational decision making as a political process: The case of the university budget. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 135-151.
23.
Rousseau, D.M. (1978). Characteristics of departments, positions and individuals: Contexts for attitudes and behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 521-537.
24.
Schilit, W.K. (1986). An examination of individual differences as moderators of upward influence activity in strategic decisions. Human Relations, 39(10), 933-953.
25.
Schilit, W.K., & Locke, E.A. (1982). A study of upward influence in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 304-316.
26.
Steers, R.M., & Braunstein, D.N. (1976). A behaviorally based measure of manifest needs in work settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 9, 251-266.
27.
Taylor, F.W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper.
28.
Thompson, J.D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
Uyterhoeven, H.E. (1972). General managers in the middle. Harvard Business Review, 50, 75-85.
30.
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (A. H. Henderson & T. Parsons, Eds.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press. (Original work published in 1924)
31.
Weinstein, D. (1979). Bureaucratic oppositions: Challenging abuses in the workplace. New York: Pergamon .
