Audit committees are standing committees of corporate boards of directors with responsibility for overseeing the company's annual audit and coordinating the efforts of external auditors, senior management, and internal auditors. Despite the growing importance of audit committees in corporate governance and despite the increasing attention given to corporate financial fraud by the media and by the U.S. Congress, little research has inquired into the determinants of audit committee effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to examine audit committee effectiveness in terms of the leadership styles of audit committee chairpersons. Results of a survey mailed to audit committee members, external auditors, and senior management suggest that transformational leadership and active management by exception, as defined by Bass (1985), have a substantial impact on the performance of audit committees.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Avolio, B., & Bass, B.M. (1985, August). Charisma and beyond. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, San Diego, CA.
2.
Bacon, J. (1988). The audit committee: A broader mandate (Report No. 914). New York: The Conference Board.
3.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unified theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
4.
Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1986). Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 92-113.
5.
Bass, B.M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations . New York: Free Press.
6.
Bass, B.M., Waldman, D.A., Avolio, B.J., & Bebb, M. (1987). Transformational leadership and the falling dominoes effect. Group & Organization Studies, 12, 73-87.
7.
Bettman, J.R., & Weitz, B.A. (1983). Attributions in the board room: Causal reasoning in corporate annual reports. Administrative Science Quarterly , 28, 165-183.
8.
Braiotta, L., Jr. (1981). The audit director's guide: How to serve effectively on the corporate audit committee. New York: Wiley.
9.
Braiotta, L., Jr., & Sommer, A.A. (1987). The essential guide to effective corporate board committees. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
Dalton, R.R., & Kesner, I.F. (1985). Organizational performance as an antecedent of inside/outside chief executive succession: An empirical assessment. A cademy of Management Journal, 28, 749-762.
12.
Evans, M.G. (1970). The effects of supervisory behavior on the path-goal relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance , 5, 277-298.
13.
Fredrickson, J.W., Hambrick, D.C., & Braumrin, S. (1988). A model of CEO dismissal. Academy of Management Review, 13, 255-270.
Friedman, S.D., & Singh, H. (1989). CEO success and stockholder wealth: The influence of organizational context and event content. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 718-744.
16.
Gerth, H., & Mills, C.W. (1946). From Max Weber. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Gordon, M.E., Slade, L.A., & Schmitt, N. (1986). The "science of the sophomore" revisited: From conjecture to empiricism. Academy of Management Review, 11, 191-207.
18.
Graen, G., & Cashman, J.F. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership frontiers. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
19.
Graen, G.B., & Scandura, T.A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In L. L. Cummings & S. B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
20.
Guion, R.M. (1983). Editorial: Comments from the new editor. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 547-551.
21.
Hater, J.J., & Bass, B.M. (1988). Supervisors' evaluations and subordinates' perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 695-702.
22.
House, R.J. (1971). Path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321-338.
23.
House, R.J. (1977). A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership: The cutting edge. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
24.
House, R.J., & Mitchell, T.R. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership . Journal of Contemporary Business, 5, 81-94.
25.
House, R.J., Spangler, W.D., & Woycke, J. (1989). Charisma and leadership of American presidents . Manuscript submitted for publication.
26.
House, R.J., Woycke, J., & Fodor, E.M. (1988). Charismatic and non-charismatic leaders: Differences in behavior and effectiveness. In J. A. Conger , R. N. Kanungo, & associates (Eds.), Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
27.
Howell, J.M., & Frost, P. (1989). A laboratory study of charismatic leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 243-269.
28.
Indvik, J. (1986). Path-goal theory of leadership: A meta analysis . In J. A. Pearce & R. B. Robinson (Eds.), Proceedings of the Academy of Management (pp. 189-192).
29.
Kesner, I.F. (1988). Directors' characteristics and committee membership: An investigation of type, occupation, tenure, and gender. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 66-84.
Milkovich, G.T., & Newman, J.M. (1987). Compensation. Plano, TX: Business Publications.
40.
New York Stock Exchange. (1977, January 6). Statement of the New York Stock Exchange on audit committee policy . New York: Author.
41.
Palmer, R.E. (1977). Audit committees: Are they effective? An auditor's view. Journal of Accountancy, 144, 76-79.
42.
Porter, L.W., & Lawler, E.E., III (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
43.
Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys. New York: Academic Press.
44.
Singh, H., & Harianto, F. (1989). Management-board relationships, takeover risk, and the adoption of golden parachutes. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 7-24.
45.
Smith, B.J. (1982). An initial test of a theory of charismatic leadership based on the responses of subordinates. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
46.
Smith, K.G., Mitchell, T.R., & Summer, C.E. (1985). Top-level management priorities in different stages of the organizational cycle. Academy of Management Journal , 28, 799-820.
47.
Tichy, N.M., & Devanna, M.A. (1986). The transformational leader. New York: Wiley.
48.
Yammarino, F.J., & Bass, B.M. (1988). Long-term forecasting of transformational leadership and its effects among naval officers: Some preliminary findings. Binghamton: State University of New York, Center for Leadership Studies.
49.
Yammarino, F.J., Spangler, W.D., & Bass, B.M. (1989). Transformational leadership and effectiveness among naval officers. Manuscript submitted for publication.
50.
Yukl, G.A., & Van Fleet, D.D. (1982). Cross situational multimethod research on military leader effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 87-108.
