Over a decade after its introduction, this article looks back on reactions to the trinitarian concept of change. Two emphases dominate. Personal reactions to the concept's reception receive initial attention, then the focus shifts to areas of significant progress in a decade's exploration of the plural concept of change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Armenakis, A.A. (1988). A review of research on the change typology In W. A. Pasmore & R. W. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organizational change development (Vol. 2., pp. 163-194). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2.
Golembiewski, R.T., & Munzenrider, R.F. (in press). Burnout as an indicator of gamma change, IJournal of Health and Human Resources Administration,11, 218-248. Parts II and III follow in later numbers of this journal.
3.
Golembiewski, R.T., & Munzenrider, R.F. (1988). The phase model of burnoutNew York: Praeger.
4.
Golembiewski, R.T., Munzenrider, R.F., & Stevenson, J. (1986). Stress in organizationsNew York: Praeger.
5.
Golembiewski, R.T., & Proehl, C.W., Jr. (1978). A survey of the empirical literature on flexible work hoursAcademy of Management Review , 3, 837-853.
6.
Golembiewski, R.T., Proehl, C.W., Jr., & Sink, D. (1981). Success of OD applications in the public sectorPublic Administration Review, 41, 679-682.
7.
Golembiewski, R.T., Proehl, C.W., Jr., & Sink, D. (1982). Estimating the success of OD interventionsTraining and Development Journal, 72, 86-95.
8.
Krell, T.C. (1981). The marketing of organization developmentJournal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17, 309-323.
9.
Janz, T., Dugan, S., & Ross, M. (1986). Organizational culture and burnoutJournal of Health and Human Resources Administration,9, 78-92.
