Research on performance appraisal systems provides many conceptual prescriptions, but little evidence exists about how well organizations adhere to these prescriptions. This article provides an empirical description of the performance appraisal systems of 36 high-technology firms, comparing what they do with what scholars have recommended they should do. Suggestions for minimizing the gap between practice and theory are offered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bassett, G.A. & Meyer, H.H. (1968). Performance appraisal based on self-reviewPersonnel Psychology, 21, 421-430.
2.
Beer, M. (1977). Note on performance appraisal. In HBS Case ServicesBoston, MA: Harvard Business School .
3.
Bernardin, H.J. & Betty, R.W. (1984). Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at workBoston: Kent.
4.
Bureau of National Affairs. (1975). Employee performance: Evaluation and controlPersonnel Policies Forum, 108 .
5.
Burke, R.J. & Kimball, L. (1971). Performance appraisal: Some issues in the processCanadian Journal of Personnel and Industrial Relations , 18, 25-34.
6.
Burke, R.J., Weitzel, W., & Weir, T. (1978). Characteristics of effective employee performance review and development interviews: Replication and extensionPersonnel Psychology, 31 , 903-919.
7.
Campbell, D.J. & Lee, C. (1988). Self-appraisals in performance evaluation: Development versus evaluationAcademy of Management Review , 13, 302-313.
Cummings, L.L. & Schwab, D.P. (1978). Designing appraisal systems for information yieldCalifornia Management Review, 20, 489-502.
10.
Farh, J., Werbel, J.C., & Bedian, A.G. (1988). An empirical investigation of self-appraisal-based performance evaluationPersonnel Psychology , 41, 141-156.
11.
Glueck, W.F. (1982). Personnel: A diagnostic approach (3rd ed.). Plano, TX: Business Publications.
12.
Gruenfeld, E.F. (1981). Performance appraisal: Promise and perilIthaca: NY: Cornell University, New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations.
13.
Heneman, R.L. (1986). The relationship between supervisory ratings and results-oriented measures of performance: A meta-analysisPersonnel Psychology, 39 , 811-826.
14.
Ilgen, D. & Feldman, J. (1983). Performance appraisal: A process focusResearch in Organizational Behavior, 5,141-197.
15.
Keeley, M. (1978). A contingency framework for performance evaluationAcademy of Management Review, 3, 428-438.
16.
Landy, F. & Farr, J. (1980). Performance ratingPsychological Bulletin, 87, 72-107.
17.
Latham, G. & Yukl, G. (1974). A review of the research on the application of goal setting in organizationsAcademy of Management Journal , 18, 824-845.
18.
Lawler, E. Iii, Mohrman, A. Jr., & Resnick, S. (1984). Performance appraisal revisitedOrganizational Dynamics, 13, 20-35.
Locke, E.A. & Schweiger, D.M. (1979). Participation in decision making: One more look In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
McConkie, M.L. (1979). A clarification of the goal setting and appraisal processes in MBOAcademy of Management Review , 4, 29-40.
23.
Meyer, H., Kay, E., & French, J. (1965). Split roles in performance appraisalsHarvard Business Review, 43,123-129.
24.
Mitchell, T.R. (1983). The effects of social, task, and situational factors on motivation, performance, and appraisal In F. Landy, S. Zedeck, & J. Cleveland (Eds.), Performance measurement and theory.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
25.
Porter, L.W. & Lawler, E.E. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performanceHomewood, IL: Irwin-Dorsey.
26.
Posner, B.Z., Hall, J.L., & Harder, J.W. (1986). People are our most important asset-but: Encouraging employee developmentBusiness Horizons , 29, 52-54.
27.
Prince, J.B. & Lawler, E. Iii. (1986). Does salary discussion hurt the developmental performance appraisal?In Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 357-375.
28.
Sashkin, M. (1981). Appraising appraisal: Ten lessons from research for practiceOrganizational Dynamics, 10, 37-50.
29.
Steers, R.M. & Porter, L.W. (1974). The role of task-goal attributes in employee performancePsychological Bulletin, 81, 434-452.
30.
Tosi, H.L. & Carroll, S.J. (1969). Some structural factors related to goal influence in the management by objectives processBusiness Topics , 17, 45-50.
31.
Wexley, K.N. & Klimoski, R. (1984). Performance appraisal : An update In K. M. Rowland & G. D. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel & human resources management (Vol. 2). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
