This article focuses on differences between the model of burnout developed by Leiter and the phase model of Golembiewski. The advantages of utilizing the full range of the subscales are contrasted with the phase approach based on dichotomizing the subscales. Directions for future model building are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Golembiewski, R.T. & Munzenrider, R. (1984). Phases of psychological burnout and organizational covariants: A replication from a large populationJournal of Health and Human Resources Administration , 6, 290-323.
2.
Jackson, S.E., Schwab, R.L., & Schuler, R.S. (1986). Toward an understanding of the burnout phenomenonJournal of Applied Psychology, 71, 630-640.
3.
Lazarus, R. & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and copingNew York: Springer.
4.
Leiter, M.P. (1988a). Burnout as a function of communication patterns: A study of a multidisciplinary mental health teamGroup and Organizational Behavior, 13 , 111-128.
5.
Leiter, M.P. (1988b). Commitment as a function of stress reactions among nurses: A model of psychological evaluations of worksettingsCanadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 7,115-132.
6.
Leiter, M.P. & Maslach, C. (1988). The impact of interpersonal environment on burnout and organizational commitmentJournal of Occupational Behavior , 9297-308.
