Interaction that occurs while a group completes a cooperative task describes how the group works. Group members working cooperatively on complex intellective tasks completed open-ended questionnaires that described interaction behaviors that facilitated and behaviors that interfered with their group's performance over the life of the group (four months). After considerable screening, these descriptions were adapted into behavioral items that made up a group style instrument. This instrument was administered at two points in time to an independent sample of subjects participating in similar groups. Descriptions of the facilitating and interfering interaction behaviors are provided. Group interaction is examined in terms of changes in responses to the items over time. The instrument was sensitive to levels of group performance, and descriptions of interaction behaviors that discriminated between performance levels are discussed. Applications for group feedback are described and implications for future research are given.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bales, R.F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groupsReading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
Bales, R.F., & Strodtbeck, F.L. (1951). Phases in group problem-solvingJournal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 46, 485-495.
3.
Bayless, O.L. (1967). An alternative pattern for problem-solving discussionJournal of Communication, 17, 188-197.
4.
Bennis, W.G., & Shepard, H.A.A. (1956). A theory of group developmentHuman Relations, 9, 415-437.
5.
Buller, P.F. (1986). The team building-task performance relation: Some conceptual and methodological refinementsGroup & Organization Studies, 11 , 147-168.
6.
Caple, R.B. (1978). The sequential stages of group developmentSmall Group Behavior, 9 , 470-476.
7.
Collins, B.E., & Guetzkow, H. (1964). A social psychology of group processes for decision-makingNew York: John Wiley.
8.
Davies, D., & Kuypers, B.C. (1985). Group development and international feedbackGroup & Organization Studies, 10, 37-59.
9.
Davis, J.H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes, Psychological Review , 80, 97-125.
10.
Fisher, B.A. (1970). Decision emergence: Phases in group decision-makingSpeech Monographs, 37, 53-66.
11.
Gladstein, D.L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectivenessAdministrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517.
12.
Hackman, J.R. (1968). Effects of task characteristics on group productsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology , 4, 162-187.
13.
Hackman, J.R. (1975). Group influences on individuals In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology.Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally .
14.
Hackman, J.R., & Morris, C.G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1-99). New York: Academic Press.
15.
Hill, G.W. (1982). Group versus individual performance: Are N +1 heads better than one?Psychology Bulletin , 91, 517-539
16.
Hirokawa, R.Y. (1982). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness, I: A critical review of inconsistent findingsCommunication Quarterly, 30,134-141.
17.
Hirokawa, R.Y. (1983). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness II: An exploratory investigation of procedural functionsWestern Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 59-74.
18.
Janis, I.L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and FiascosBoston, MA: Houghton.
19.
Katzell, R.A., Miller, C.E., Rotter, N.G., & Venet, T.G. (1970). Effects of leadership and other inputs on group processes and outputsJournal of Social Psychology , 80, 157-169.
20.
Landsberger, H.A. (1955). Interaction process analysis of the mediation of labor management disputesJournal of Abnormal Psychology , 51, 522-558.
21.
Laughlin, P.R., & Adamopoulos, J. (1980). Social combination processes and individual learning for six-person cooperative groups on an intellective taskJournal of Personality and Social Psychology , 6, 941-947.
22.
Maier, N.R.F., & Maier, R.A. (1957). An experimental test of the effects of "development" vs "free" discussion on the quality of group decisionsJournal of Applied Psychology, 41, 320-323.
23.
Michaelsen, L.K., Watson, W.E., Cragin, J., & Fink, D. (1982). Team learning: A potential solution to the problems of large classesExchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal, 7, 21-33.
24.
Michaelsen, L.K., Watson, W.E., & Schrader, L. (1985). Informative testing-A practical approach for tutoring with groupsOrganizational Behavior Teaching Review, 9, 18-33.
25.
Morris, C.G. (1966). Task effects on group interactionJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 545-554.
26.
Nie, N. H., Hull, J. C., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K., & Bent, D. H. (Eds.). (1975). SPSS: Statistical package for the social sciences.New York: McGraw-Hill .
27.
Osborn, A.F. (1957). Applied imagination (Rev. ed.) New York: Schribner's.
28.
Ray, A. A. (Ed.). (1982). SAS user's guide: Statistics.Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
29.
Schutz, W.C. (1958). FIRO: A three dimensional theory of interpersonal behaviorNew York: Rinehart.
30.
Scott, W.A., & Scott, R. (1981). Intercorrelations among structural properties of primary groupsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology , 41, 279-292.
31.
Shaw, M.E. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behaviorNew York: McGraw-Hill .
32.
Spich, R.S. (1985). Explicit Norm Structuring Process: A Strategy for Increasing Task-Group EffectivenessGroup & Organization Studies, 10, 37-59.
33.
Steiner, I.D. (1972). Group process and productivityNew York: Academic Press.
34.
Tatsuoka, M.M. (1981). Discriminant analysis: The study of group differencesChampaign, IL: Institutes for Personality and Ability Testing.
35.
Tuckman, B.W. (1965). Development sequence in small groupsPsychological Bulletin, 63 , 384-399.
