Assumed similarity is a distortion of perceptions that may occur during assessment interviews. This happens when the assessor, attracted to the candidate, assumes incorrectly that the candidate shares characteristics similar to him- or herself. The present study examines assumed similarity in relation to the assessment process. Canonical correlation found a significant relationship between attraction and assumptions of similarity. Managers consistently perceived the speaker as having communication styles and social skills similar to themselves. This included both positive and negative characteristics. Implications of these findings are discussed in relation to the actual assessment process and in teaching assessment skills that control the distortion of assumed similarity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arvey, R., & Campion, J. (1982). The employment interview: A summary and review of recent research. Personnel Psychology, 35, 281-322.
2.
Bernardin, H., & Pence, E. (1980). Effects of rater training: Creating new response set and decreasing accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology , 65, 60-66.
3.
Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
4.
Byrne, D., & Nelson, D. (1965). Attractions as a linear function of proportion of positive reinforcements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 659-663.
5.
Cronbach, L.J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on "understanding others" and "assumed similarity." Psychological Bulletin, 52,177-193.
6.
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, J. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285-290.
7.
Fay C., & Latham, G. (1982). Effects of training and rating scales on rating errors. Personnel Psychology, 35, 105-116.
8.
Ferris G., & Gilmore, D. (1977). Effects of mode of presentation, sex of applicant, and sex of interviewers on simulated interview decisions. Psychological Reports, 40, 566.
9.
Grandberg, D., Jefferson, N.L., Brent, E.E., & King, M. (1981). Membership group, reference group, and the attribution of attitudes of groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 833-842.
10.
Holtz, R., & Miller, N. (1985). Assumed similarity and opinion certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 890-898.
11.
Huseman, R.C., Lahiff, J., Oenrose, B., & Hatfield, J.D. (1984). Business communication (2nd ed.). Chicago: Dryden Press.
12.
Jaokolka, G., Beyer, J.M., & Trice, H.M. (1985). Measuring and predicting managerial success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 26, 189-205.
13.
Kinicki, A.J., & Lockwood, C.A. (1985). The interview process: An examination of factors recruiters use in evaluating job applicants. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 26, 717-725.
14.
Krahe, B. (1983). Self-serving bias in perceived similarity and causal attributions of other people's performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46(4), 318-329.
15.
Lorenzo, R. (1984). Effects of assessorship on managers' proficiency in acquiring, evaluating and communicating information about people. Personnel Psychology, 37, 617-634.
16.
Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1982). Target attractiveness and mediator of assumed attitude similarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 8(4), 728-735.
17.
Marks, G., Miller, N., & Maruyama, G. (1981). Effect of target's physical attractiveness on assumptions of similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 198-206.
18.
Mayfield, E., Brown, S., & Hamstra, B. (1980). Selective interviewing in the life insurance industry: An update of research and practice. Personnel Psychology, 33, 725-739.
19.
Michael, M.E., Gilroy, F.D., & Sherman, M.F. (1984). Athletic similarity and attitudes towards women as factors in the perceived physical attractiveness and liking of a female varsity athlete. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 511-518.
20.
Miller, N., & Marks, G. (1982). Assumed similarity between self and other: Effect of expectation of future interaction with that other. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 100-105.
21.
Norton, R., & Warnick, B. (1976). Assertiveness as a communication construct. Human Communication Research, 3(1), 62-66.
22.
Purcell, E., Dossett, D., & Latham, D. (1980). Obtaining valid predictors by minimizing rating errors in the new criteria. Personnel Psychology, 65, 60-66.
23.
Rathus, S., & Spencer, A. (1973). A 30-item schedule for assessing assertive behavior . Behavior Therapy,4, 398-406.
24.
Reilly, R., & Chao, G. (1982). Validity and fairness of some alternative employee selection procedures. Personnel Psychology, 35,1-61.
25.
Ross, L., Green, D., & Mouse, P. (1977). The "false consensus effect": An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279-301.
26.
Rowe, P.M. (1984). Decision processes in personnel selection. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 16(4), 326-337.
27.
Sherwood, G.G. (1981). Self-serving bias in person perception: A reexamination of projection as a mechanism of defense. Psychological Bulletin , 90, 445-459.
28.
Stroebe, W., Insko, C.A., Thompson, V.D., & Layton, B.D.( 1971). Effects of physical attractiveness, attitude similarity, and sex on various aspects of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 79-91.
29.
Touhey, J.C. (1972). Comparison of two dimensions of attitude similarity on heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 8-10.
30.
Tucker, R.K. (1981). Unpublished manuscript. Bowling Green State University, School of Communication, Bowling Green, OH.
31.
Wherry, R.J., & Bartlett, C.J. (1982). The control of bias in ratings: A theory of rating. Personnel Psychology, 35, 521-541.
32.
Vance, R., Kuhnert, K., & Farr, J. (1978). Interview judgments: Using external criteria to compare behavior and graphic scale ratings. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 279-294.
