This article uses cases from the field to demonstrate the potential of network analysis as an intervention tool. Social networks are defined as sets of contacts linking individuals. These networks may be represented by "adjacency matrices." Analysis of adjacency matrices is found especially useful for diagnosing formal organizational arrangements, for identifying coalitions, and for analyzing intergroup relations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bacharach, S.B., & Lawler, E.J. (1980). Power and politics in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Berkowitz, S.G. (1982). An introduction to structural analysis. Toronto: Butterworth.
3.
Boje, D.M., & Whetten, D.A. (1981). Effects of organizational strategies and contextual constraints on centrality and attributions of influence in interorganizational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 378-395.
4.
Breiger, R.L. (1979). Toward an operational theory of community elite structures. Quantity and Quality, 13, 21-57.
5.
Breiger, R.L., Boorman, S.A., & Arabie, P. (1975). An algorithm for clustering relational data, with applications to social network analysis and comparison with multidimensional scaling. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 12, 328-383.
6.
Grannovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
7.
Knoke, D., & Kulinski,J. H. (1982). Network analysis: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Beverly Hills, CA : Sage.
8.
Krackhardt, D., & Porter, L.W. (1985). When friends leave: A structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayer's attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 242-261.
9.
Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R. (1986). The structuring of informal organizations and management crises. Cornell University, Graduate School of Management, Ithaca, NY.
10.
Lawrence, P.R., & Lorsch, J.W. (1967). Organization and environment. Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration , Boston.
11.
Miles, R.E., & Snow, C.C. (1978). Organization strategy, structure and process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
Nelson, R.E. (1986). Social networks and organizational intervention: Insights from an area-wide labor-management committee. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22, 75-85.
13.
Paulson, S.K., & Decker, J. (1987, February). Managerial applications of network analysis in assessing organizational interdependencies. Paper presented at the Seventh Social Network Conference, Miami.
14.
Perrow, C. (1979). Complex organizations: A critical essay (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
15.
Pfeffer, J. (1982). Organizations and organization theory. Boston: Pitman.
16.
Rogers, E.M., & Kincaid, L.D. (1980). Communication networks: Toward a paradigm for research. New York: Free Press.
17.
Rothlisberger, F.J., & Dickson, W. (1947). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Stevenson, W.B., Pearce, J.L., & Porter, L.W. (1985). The concept of coalition in organization theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 10, 256-258.
19.
Thompson, J. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
Tichy, N., Tushman, M., & Frombrun, C. (1979). Social network analysis for organizations. Academy of Management Review, 4, 507-519.
21.
Van deVen, A., & Ferry, D.L. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York: John Wiley.
22.
Vaverek, K.A., Tosi, H.L., & Zahrly, J.H. (1987, February). Performance andstructural characteristics . Paper presented at the Seventh Social Network Conference, Miami.
23.
Walker, G. (1985). Network position and cognition in a computer software firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 103-130.
24.
White, H., Boorman, S., & Breiger, R.L. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks: I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 730-780.
25.
Woodward, J. (1965). Industrial organization: Theory and practice. London: Oxford University Press.
