A repeated-measures control group experiment, designed in the group polarization tradition, revealed significant shifts in individuals' task perceptions and attitudes after discussion with coworkers. A process incorporating converging perspectives on task design—whereby employees form initial reactions to tasks, process incoming social information, and adjust their perceptions accordingly—is suggested. Impli cations for managers and change agents are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, N., & Graesser, C. (1976). An information integration analysis of attitude change in group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 210-222.
2.
Bateman, T.S., & Organ, D.W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee "citizenship." Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587-595.
3.
Billig, M., & Cochrane, R. (1976). Judgments of values and group polarization: Tests of the value-for-risk hypothesis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 495-501.
4.
Blau, G. (1983). Source and receiver characteristics affecting social influences. Academy of Management Proceedings , 188-192.
5.
Blau, G., & Katerberg, R. (1982). Toward enhancing research with the social information processing approach to job design. Academy of Management Review , 7, 543-550.
6.
Cartwright, D. (1971). Risk taking by individuals and groups: An assessment of research employing choice dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 361-370.
7.
Cattell, R.B. (1966). The meaning and strategic use of factor analysis . In R. B. Cattell (Ed.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 174-243). Chicago: Rand McNally.
8.
Cecil, E., Cummings, L., & Chertkoff, J. (1973). Group composition and choice shift: Implications for administration. Academy of Management Journal, 16,412-422.
9.
Cheit, E.F. (1985). Business schools and their critics. California Management Review, 27(3), 43-62.
10.
Cvetkovich, G., & Baumgardner, S.R. (1973). Attitude polarization: The relative influence of discussion group structure and reference group norms . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 159-165.
11.
Griffin, R. (1982). Task design: An integrative approach. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
12.
Griffin, R., Bateman, T., & Skivington, J. (1983). Social cues as information sources: Extensions and refinements. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, Dallas.
13.
Hackman, J.R., & Lawler, E. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 259-286.
14.
Hackman, J.R., & Oldham, G. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279.
15.
Kaiser, H., & Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34,111-117.
16.
Kim, J., & Mueller, C. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Lamm, H., & Myers, D. (1978). Group-induced polarization of attitudes and behavior . In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 145-195). New York: Academic Press.
19.
Mackie, D.M. (1986). Social identification effects in group polarization . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 720-728.
20.
Mazer, B. (1970). Hot Stove League. New York : WNBC Radio.
21.
Moscovici, S., & Zavolloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 125-135.
22.
Myers, D. (1975). Discussion-induced attitude polarization. Human Relations, 28, 699-714.
23.
Myers, D., & Bach, P. (1974). Discussion effects on militarism-pacifism: A test of the group polarization hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 741-747.
24.
Myers, D., & Lamm, H. (1976). The group polarization phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 602-627.
25.
Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York : McGraw-Hill.
26.
O'Connor, E.J., & Barrett, G.V. (1980). Informational cues and individual differences as determinants of subjective perceptions of task enrichment. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 697-716.
27.
O'Reilly, C.A., & Caldwell, D.F. (1979). Information influence as a determinant of perceived task characteristics and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64,157-165.
28.
Pfeffer, J. (1981). Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 1-52). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
29.
Roberts, J., & Glick, W. (1981). The job characteristics approach to task design: A critical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66,193-217.
30.
Salancik, G., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly , 23, 224-253.
31.
Schneider, B., Parkington, J.J., & Buxton, V.M. (1980). Employee and customer perceptions of service in banks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 252-267.
32.
Scott, W.E., Jr. (1967). The development of semantic differential scales as measures of "morale." Personnel Psychology, 20, 179-198.
33.
Sims, H.P., Szilagyi, A., & Keller, R. (1976). The measurement of job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 195-212.
34.
Stephenson, G., & Brotherton, C. (1975). Social progression and polarization: A study of discussion and negotiation in groups of mining supervisors . British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14, 241-252.
35.
Stoner, J.A. (1961). A comparison of individual and group decisions involving risk. Unpublished master's thesis, School of Industrial Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
36.
Thomas, J., & Griffin, R.W. (1983). The social information processing model of task design: A review of the literature. Academy of Management Review, 8, 672-682.
37.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases . Science, 185, 1124-1131.
38.
Weiss, J.M., & Shaw, J.B. (1979). Social influence on judgements about tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24,126-140.
39.
White, S.E., & Mitchell, T.R. (1979). Job enrichment versus social cues: A comparison and competitive test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64,1-9.