Abstract
In recent years there has been an emphasis in the leadership literature on situational factors in leadership at the expense of traits research. New evidence, however, suggests that the abandon ment of the research for leadership traits may have been premature. This study compares individuals holding defined leadership posi tions with nonleaders on a number of personality dimensions. The results indicate significant differences between the two groups regarding specific traits and the overarching concept of personality congruence. Conclusions are drawn concerning the implications of these findings for those concerned with leadership development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
