This article develops and tests the hypothesis that random assign
ment to OD interventions has a negative impact on attitudes. Three
published empirical studies using random assignment in work
organizations are reviewed; the results were consistent with the
hypothesis. The issues of negative attitudinal effects of random
assignment are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bullock, R.J., & Lawler, E.E. (1984). Gainsharing: A few questions, and fewer answers . Human Resource Management, 23, 23-40.
2.
Bullock, R.J., & Svyantek, D.J. (1985). Analyzing meta-analysis: Potential problems, an unsuccessful replication, and evaluation criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 108-115.
3.
Bullock, R.J., & Tubbs, M. (1983). A meta-analysis of gainsharing plans as OD interventions . Paper presented to the OD Division of the Academy of Management, Dallas, TX.
4.
Campbell, J.P., Daft, R.L., & Hulin, C.L. (1982). What to study: Generating and developing research questions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
5.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
6.
Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin , 70, 213-220.
7.
DeMeuse, K.P., & Liebowitz, S.J. (1981). An empirical analysis of team-building research. Group & Organizational Studies , 6, 357-378.
8.
Foa, U.G. (1966). Perception of behavior in reciprocal roles: The ringex model. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied , 80(15, Whole No. 632).
9.
Golembiewski, R.T., Proehl, C.W., & Sink, D. (1982, April). Estimating the success of OD applications . Training and Development Journal.
10.
Jackson, G.B. (1978, April). Methods for reviewing and integrating research in the social sciences. Final Report to the National Science Foundation for Grant No. DIS 76-20309. Washington, DC: Social Research Group, George Washington University.
11.
Jackson, G.B. (1980). Methods for integrative reviews. Review of Educational Research, 50, 438-460.
12.
Kerlinger, F.N. (1973). Foundations of behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
13.
Margulies, N., Wright, P.L., & Scholl, R.W. (1977). Organization development techniques: There impact on change. Group & Organization Studies, 2, 428-448.
14.
Morrison, P. (1978). Evaluation in OD: A review and an assessment. Group and Organization Studies, 3, 42-70.
15.
Porras, J.I., & Berg, P.O. (1978). Evaluation methodology in organization development: Analysis and critique. Journal of Applied Behavioral-Science , 14, 151-174.
16.
Proehl, C.W. (1980). Planned organizational change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia.
17.
Runkel, P.J., & McGrath, J.E. (1972). Research on human behavior: A systematic guide to method. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
18.
Terpstra, D.E. (1981). Relationship between methodological rigor and reported outcomes in organization development evaluation research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 541-543.
19.
White, S.E., & Mitchell, T.R. (1976). Organization development: A review of research content and research design. Academy of Management Review, 1, 57-73.
20.
Woodman, R.W., & Sherwood, J.J. (1980). The role of team development in organizational effectiveness: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 166-186.
