A team development intervention with a squadron at the U.S. Air Force
Academy is reported. A six-month follow-up involving comparisons with an
equivalent control squadron indicated that the intervention positively influ
enced both climate and performance variables in the target organization.
Results are discussed in the context of current skepticism about the utility of
process interventions for effecting lasting improvement in organizational
effectiveness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Argyris, C.Organization and innovation. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press, 1965.
2.
Beckhard, R.An organization improvement program in a decentralized organization. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1966, 2, 3-25.
3.
Beer, M.The technology of organization development. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally , 1976.
4.
Boss, R.W., & McConkie, M.L.The destructive impact of a positive team-building intervention. Group & Organization Studies, 1981, 6, 45-56.
5.
Campbell, J.P., & Dunnette, M.D.Effectiveness of T-group experiences in managerial training and development. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 70, 73-104.
6.
Clover, W.H., Rosenback, W.E., & Hughes, R.L.The Squadron Assessment Questionnaire. Colorado Springs, CO: U.S. Air Force Academy, 1979 .
7.
DeMeuse, K.P., & Liebowitz, S.J.An empirical analysis of team-building research . Group & Organization Studies, 6(3), 1981, 357-378.
8.
Friedlander, F.The impact of organizational training laboratories upon the effectiveness and interaction of ongoing work groups. Personnel Psychology , 1967, 20, 289-307.
9.
Hautaluoma, J.E., & Gavin, J.F.Effects of organizational diagnosis and intervention on blue collar blues . Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1975 , 11, 475-496.
10.
Huse, E.Organization development and change (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West, 1980.
11.
Kaplan, R.E.The utility of maintaining work relationships openly: An experimental study . Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1979 , 15, 41-59 (a)
12.
Kaplan, R.E.The conspicuous absence of evidence that process consultation enhances task performance. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1979, 15, 346-360. (b)
13.
Keutzer, C.S., Fosmire, F.R., Diller, R., & Smith, M.D.Laboratory training in a new social system: Evaluation of a consulting relationship with high school faculty. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science , 1971, 4, 493-501.
14.
Kimberly, J.R., & Nielsen, W.R.Organization development and change in organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1975, 20, 191-205.
15.
Kobayashi, K.Team development in a banking corporation in Japan. Interpersonal Development,5, 1975, 181-194.
16.
Kuriloff, A.H., & Atkins, S.T-group for a work team. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science , 1966, 2, 63-93.
17.
Lacks, P.B., Landsbaum, J.B., & Stern, M.R.Workshop in communication for members of a psychiatric team. Psychological Reports, 1970, 26, 423-430.
18.
Lipshitz, R., & Sherwood, J.J.The effectiveness of third-party consultation as a function of the consultant's prestige and style of intervention. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1978, 14, 493-509.
19.
Menninger, R.W.The impact of group relations conferences on organizational growth. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 1972, 22, 415-432.
20.
Moos, R.H.Changing the social milieu of psychiatric treatment settings. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1973, 9, 575-593.
21.
Nadler, D.A., & Pecorella, P.A.Differential effects of multiple interventions in an organization. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science , 1975, 11, 348-366.
22.
Nicholas, J.M.Evaluation research in organizational change interventions: Considerations and some suggestionsJournal of Applied Behavioral Science , 1979, 15, 23-40.
23.
Porras, J.I., & Wilkins, A.Organization development in a large system: An empirical assessment. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1980, 16, 506-534.
Shapiro, J.L., & Ross, R.R.Sensitivity training for staff in an institution for adolescent offenders . Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971 , 7, 710-723.
26.
Smith, P.B.Controlled studies of the outcome of sensitivity training. Psychological Bulletin, 1975, 82, 597-622.
27.
Taylor, J., & Bowers, D.The survey of organizations: A machine-scored standardized questionnaire instrument . Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, 1972.
28.
Woodman, R.W., & Sherwood, J.J.Effects of team development intervention: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1980,16,211-227. (a)
29.
Woodman, R.W., & Sherwood, J.J.The role of team development in organizational effectiveness: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88, 166-186. (b)
30.
Zand, D.E., Steele, F.I., & Zalkind, S.S.The impact of an organizational develpment program on perceptions of interpersonal, group, and organization functioning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1969, 5, 393-410.
