Participation and Pay

Abstract

The participation literature generally avoids the risky area of pay decisions. This research investigated the impact on individual attitudes of participation in important pay decisions. A merit pay plan was participatively designed, installed, and maintained in a professional engineering organization (N = 380). The plan involved nomination by peers and supervisors of outstanding per formers for a cash bonus of approximately $2000. Using objective and subjective measures, participation predicted increases in understanding and commit ment to the new pay plan, organizational involvement, job involvement, and job satisfaction. Participation also predicted improvements in the perceived performance-pay contingency and pay equity, but it did not improve pay satis faction. A follow-up analysis of the award recipients showed that merit award status predicted increased job satisfaction, performance-pay contingency per ceptions, and commitment. Several aspects of participative pay decisions are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Argyris, C. Management and organizational development: The path from XA to YB . New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.

Bullock, R.J. , & Lawler, E.E. Incentives and gainsharing: Stimuli for productivity. In J. D. Hogan & A. M. Crait (Eds.), Dimensions of productivity research. Houston: American Productivity Center, 1980.

Coch, L. , & French, J.R.P. Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 1948, 1, 512-533.

Cronbach, J.L. , & Furby, L. How we should measure "change"—or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 1970, 74, 68-80.

Frost, C.F. , Wakeley, J.H. , & Ruh, R.A. The Scanlon Plan for Organization Development: Identity, participation, and equity. East Lansing: Michigan State University, 1974.

Goodman, R.K. , Wakeley, J.H. , & Ruh, R.A. What employees think of the Scanlon Plan. Personnel , 1972, 49, 22-99.

Lawler, E.E. Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological view. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.

Lawler, E.E. , & Bullock, R.J. Pay and organizational change. Personnel Administrator , 1978, 23 (5), 32-36.

Lawler, E.E. , & Hackman, J.R. Impact of employee participation in the development of pay incentive plans: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1969, 53, 467-471.

10.

Lawler, E.E. , & Jenkins, G.D. Employee participation in pay plan development. Department of Labor Manpower Administration Report #21-26-74-13-1. Springfield, VA: National Information Service, 1976.

11.

Likert, R. New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.

12.

Locke, E.A. , & Schweiger, D.M. Participation in decision-making: One more look . In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1.). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1979.

13.

Lowin, A. Participative decision making: A model, literature, critique, and prescriptions for research. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance , 1968, 3, 68-106.

14.

March, J.G. , & Simon, H.A. Organizations. New York: John Wiley , 1958.

15.

Moore, B. , & Goodman, P. Factors affecting the impact of a companywide incentive program of productivity . Report submitted to the National Commission on Productivity, 1973.

16.

Morse, N. , & Reimer, E. The experimental change of a major organizational variable. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1956, 52, 120-129.

17.

Patchen, M. Participation, achievement, and involvement on the job. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1970.

18.

Ruh, R.A. , Johnson, R.H. & Scontrino, M.P. The Scanlon Plan, participation in decision making, and job attitudes. Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1973,1, 36-45.

19.

Scheflen, K. , Lawler, E.E. , & Hackman, J.R. Long-term impact of employee participation in the development of pay incentive plans: A field experiment revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology , 1971, 55, 182-186.

20.

Survey Research Center. Michigan organizational assessment package. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, 1975.

21.

Tucker, L.R. , Damarin, F. & Messick, S. A base-free measure of change. Psychometrika, 1966, 31, 457-473.

22.

White, J.K. The Scanlon Plan: Causes and correlates of success. Academy of Management Journal, 1979, 22, 292-312.

23.

Wood, M.T. Power relationships and group decision making in organizations. Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 79, 280-293.