This article reviews the major tenets of the groupthink hypothesis of Irving
Janis, as well as the research on which it is based. In addition, previous
research on group dynamics related to groupthink is briefly reviewed and
compared to groupthink propositions. Finally, guidelinesfor research to test the
propositions of groupthink are proposed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Back, K.W.Influence through social communication. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 1951, 46, 9-23.
2.
Berkowitz, L.Group standards, cohesiveness, and productivity. Human Relations , 1954, 7, 505-519.
3.
Carter, L.F.On defining leadership. In M. Sherif and M. O. Wilson (Eds.), Group relations at the crossroads. New York: Harper & Row, 1953.
4.
Cartwright, D.Risktaking by individuals and groups: An assessment of research employing choice dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 1971, 20(3), 361-378.
5.
Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (Eds.). Group dynamics: Research and theory (3rd. ed.). New York: Harper & Row, 1968.
Festinger, L.Informal social communication. Psychological Review , 1950, 57, 271-282.
8.
Goodacre, D.M., III. The use of a sociometric test as a predictor of combat unit effectiveness . Sociometry, 1951, 14, 148-152.
9.
Hemphill, J.K., & Sechrest, L.A comparison of three criteria of air crew effectiveness in combat over Korea . American Psychologist, 1952, 7, 391.
10.
Hoffman, L.R.Group problem solving. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic , 1965.
11.
Janis, J.L.Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972.
12.
Moscovici, S., & Zaballoni, M.The group as polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969, 12, 125-135.
13.
Myers, D.G., & Bach, P.J.Discussion effects on militarism—Pacifism: A test of the group polarization hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 30, 741-747.
14.
Myers, D.G., & Lamm, H.The polarization effect of group discussion. American Scientist , 1975, 63, 297-303.
15.
Pruitt, D.G.Choice shifts in group discussion: An introductory review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971 , 20(3), 339-360. (a)
16.
Pruitt, D.G.Conclusions: Toward an understanding of choice shifts in group discussion . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 20(3), 495-510. (b)
17.
Schachter, S., Ellertson, N., McBride, D., & Gregory, D.An experimental study of cohesiveness and productivity. Human Relations, 1951, 4, 229-238.
18.
Seashore, S.E.Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, 1954.
19.
Shaw, M.E.Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.
20.
Shaw, M.E., & Shaw, L.M.Some effects of sociometric grouping upon learning in a second grade classroom . Journal of Social Psychology, 1962, 57, 453-458.
Stoner, J.A.F.A comparison of individual and group decisions involving risk. Unpublished Master's thesis, School of Industrial Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1961.
23.
Strupp, H.H., & Hausman, H.J.Some correlates of group productivity. American Psychologist , 1953, 8, 443-444.
24.
Van Zelst, R.H.Sociometrically selected work teams increase production. Personnel Psychology, 1952, 5, 175-186. (a)
25.
Van Zelst, R.H.Validation of a sociometric grouping procedure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1952, 47, 299-301. (b)
26.
Von Bergen, C.W., Jr., & Kirk, R.J.Groupthink: When too many heads spoil the decision . Management Review, 1978, 44-49.
27.
Vroom, V.H., Grant, L.D., & Cotton, T.S.The consequences of social interaction in group problem solving. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1969 , 4, 77-95.
