Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The present study investigated the impact of an MBO application in a university setting. It was hypothesized that faculty performance levels would be positively affected, while satisfaction levels would not be influenced. A total of 23 faculty from the College of Business and Economics at the University of Idaho completed a questionnaire regarding their perceptions of performance and satisfaction both prior to and after the MBO application. Additionally, data were gathered through archival, nonobtrusive methods (performance records) and interviews with department heads. The results suggest that performance increased as a result of the MBO application, while satisfaction generally declined. Possible reasons for the findings are offered, and implications are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beer, M. Organization change and development: A systems view. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear, 1980 .

Drucker, P.F. The practice of management. New York: Harper & Row, 1954.

French, J.R.P. , Kay, E. , & Meyer, H.H. Participation and the appraisal system. Human Relations , 1966, 19, 3-19.

Heaton, C. P. (Ed.) Management by objectives in higher education: Theory, cases, and implementation. Durham, NC: NLHE, 1975.

Huse, E.F. Organization development and change. Boston: West, 1980.

Ivancevich, J.M. Changes in performance in a management by objectives program. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1974, 19, 563-574.

Latham, G.P. , & Yukl, G.A. A review of research on the application of goal setting in organizations . Academy of Management Journal, 1975, 18, 824-825.

Locke, E.A. Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1968, 3, 157-189.

McGregor, D. An uneasy look at performance appraisal. Harvard Business Review, 1957, 35, 89-94.

10.

Miner, J.B. Theories of organizational behavior. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press, 1980.

11.

Odiorne, G.S. Management by objectives. New York: Pitman, 1965.

12.

Raia, A.P. Goal setting and self control: An empirical study. Journal of Management Studies, 1965, 2, 32-53.

13.

Raia, A.P. A second look at management by goals and controls. California Management Review, 1966, 8, 49-58.

14.

Shetty, Y.K. , & Carlisle, H.M. Organizational correlates of a management by objectives program. Academy of Management Journal, 1974, 17, 155-159.

15.

Smith, P.C. , Kendall, L.M. , & Hulin, C.L. The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally 1969

16.

Steers, R.M. Task-goal attributes, achievement, and supervisory performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975 , 13, 392-403.

17.

Steers, R.M. , & Porter, L.W. The role of task-goal attributes in employee performance. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81, 434-452.

18.

Umstot, D.D. , Bell, C.H. , & Mitchell, T.R. Effects of job enrichment and task goals on satisfaction and productivity: Implications for job design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 379-394.

The Effects of MBO on Levels of Performance and Satisfaction Among University Faculty

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References