This study empirically investigates the use of the Nominal Group Technique
(NGT) as an informational input mechanism into the formulation of a Solar
Energy Plan for the state of Oklahoma. Data collected from a questionnaire
administered to participants of an NGT solar energy planning workshop
indicated that the NGT was rated as being a highly effective mechanism for
providing input into the solar energy planning process. These results appear to
support an increased use of NGT in problem-solving situations such as long-
range planning where issues are highly complex and heterogeneous input is
required.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bornstedt, G.W.A quick method for determining the reliability and validity of multiple item scales. American Sociological Review, 1969 , 34(4), 542-548.
2.
Campbell, J.P.Individual versus group problem solving in an industrial sample. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1968, 52(3), 205-210.
3.
Chung, K.H., & Ferris, M.J.An inquiry of the nominal group process. Academy of Management Journal, 1971, 14(2), 520-524.
4.
Delbecq, A.L., & Van de Ven, A.H.Nominal group techniques for involving client and resource experts in program planning. Academy of management proceedings, 1970.
5.
Delbecq, A.L., & Van de Ven, A.H.A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science , 1971. 7, 466-492.
6.
Delbecq, A.L., Van de Ven, A.H., & Gustafson, D.H.Group techniques for programming planning. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman, 1975 .
7.
Grabbe, E.M.Short-term, low-cost technology assessments in Hawaii. Paper presented to the First International Congress on Technology Assessment . The Hague, May, 1973.
8.
Gustafson, D.H., Shulka, R.K., Delbecq, A.L., & Walster, W.G.A comparative study of differences in subjective likelihood estimates made by individuals, interacting groups, Delphi groups, and nominal groups . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1973, 9, 280-291.
9.
Hoffman, L., & Maier, N.Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 1961, 62, 401-407.
10.
Huber, G.P., & Delbecq, A.L.Guidelines for combining the judgments of individual members in decision conferences . Academy of Management Journal, 1972, 15(2), 161-174.
11.
Knippen, J.T., & Van Voorhis, K.R.Nominal grouping: Technique for increasing the effectiveness of organizational communication and problem solving efforts . Academy of Management Proceedings, 1974, 24.
12.
Medin, M.J.Make public participation produce results. The American City & County, 1975 (October).
13.
Metz, R.A.Letter to J. L. Rodgers, Department of Regional and City Planning, University of Oklahoma, October 11, 1976.
14.
Mosley, D.C., & Green, T.B.Nominal grouping as an organization development intervention technique . Training and Development Journal,1974, 28(3),30-37.
15.
Moynihan, D.P.Maximum feasible misunderstanding: Community action in the war on poverty . New York: Free Press, 1969.
16.
Myers, D.G., & Lamm, H.The polarizing effect of group discussion. American Scientist , 1975, 63, 297-303.
17.
Osborn, A.F.Applied imagination. New York: Scribners, 1957.
18.
Rotter, G.S., & Portugal, S.M.Group and individual effects in problem solving . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1969, 53, 338-341.
19.
Souder, W.E.Effectiveness of nominal and interacting group decision processes for integrating R&D and marketing. Management Science , 1977, 23(6), 595-605.
20.
Van de Ven, A.H.Group decision-making effectiveness. Kent, OH: Kent State University Center for Business and Economic Research Press, 1974.
21.
Van deVen, A.H., & Delbecq, A.L.The effectiveness of nominal, Delphi, and interacting group decision-making processes. Academy of Management Journal, 1974, 17(4), 605-621.
22.
Voelker, A.H.Power plant siting: An application of the nominal group process technique . Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL/ NUREG/TM-81,1977.
23.
Yost, E.B., & Herbert, T.T.Group decision format, leadership style, and decision quality: A comparison of nominal and interacting groups. Unpublished paper, Franklin University, Columbus, OH.
