Abstract
This article, after briefly presenting moral development theory, analyzes the theory from the perspective of small-group processes and behaviors. The author hypothesizes that upper movement in the stages of moral reasoning is more apt to occur under a combination condition of high interpersonal competence and high role taking. The relationship between moral reasoning and behavior is also examined. The author takes the position that moral reasoning is perhaps necessary, but not sufficient, forschool endeavors and that attention ought to focus equally on moral behavior and reasoning. The bureaucratic and authoritarian nature of the school system, which mitigates against such focus, is also discussed. He concludes that if schools accept the charge of moral education toward action, such an outcome can develop only within a context of general school structural/organizational change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
