Split Role Between Practitioner and Researcher: A Dynamic Interpretation of Role Differentiation and Its Contribution to the Reduction of Role Strains-A Case Study

Abstract

The literature on the relationship between practitioners and researchers in "quasi-experimental" field studies in which the two roles are not filled by one person describes strains, tensions, and conflicts. This paper analyzes the strains that result from an intensive community renewal and development project that was accompanied by intensive process- and-outcome evaluation research. Although the two parts are inherently independent in their objectives, they become dependent because of their design and hence provide escalated chances for strains. Strains resulting from the participation of the three parties—the community (as client), the practitioner, and the researcher—are identified. The case study, which took place in an Israeli kibbutz, illustrates a dynamic develop ment of an alternative interaction model with split-role differentiation. The model starts with coordination with relatively high differentiation and moves through cooperation to develop a collaborative relationship without jeopardizing the basic roles for successfully obtaining the ob jectives of both parties. Some conclusions are derived for the basic interpersonal values and ethics needed to conduct such a relationship successfully. Implications are suggested for planners (both practitioners and researchers) of training programs and for the management of tem porary interdisciplinary teams.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams, S. Status congruency as a variable in small group performance. Social Forces, 1953, 3, 16-22.

Argyris, C. Creating effective relationship in organizations. Human Organization , 1970, 17(1), 34-40.

Barnes, L.B. Organizational change in field experiment method. In V. Vroom (Ed.), Methods in organization research . Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1967.

Burke, W.W. Organization development in transition. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1976, 12(1), 22-43.

Caro, F.G. Experimental methodology and innovative social programming. In F. G. Caro (Ed.), Evaluation research (2nd ed.). New York : Russell Sage, 1977.

Cherns, A.B.

Can behavioral science help design organizations?

Organizational Dynamics, Spring 1977, 44-64.

Ekstein, R. , & Wallerstein, R.S. The teaching and learning of psychotherapy . New York: Basic Books, 1958.

Herbst, P.G. Socio-technical design: Strategies in multidisciplinary research. London: Tavistock Publications, 1974.

Herzog, E. Some guidelines for evaluative research. Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare , 1959.

10.

Mitchell, H.E. , & Mudd, E.H. Anxieties associated with the conduct of research in a clinical setting ., American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1953 , 27, 314.

11.

Riecken, H.W. , & Boruch, R.F. (Eds.). Social experimentation: A method for planning and evaluating social intervention. New York: Academic Press, 1974.

12.

Rodman, H. , & Kolodny, R. Organizational strains in the researcher-practitioner relationship . In F.G. Caro (Ed.), Evaluation research. (2nd ed.). New York: Russell Sage , 1977.

13.

Scriven, M. The methodology of evaluation. In Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (American Educational Research Association Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation . Chicago: Rand McNally , 1967.

14.

Shelhav, M. Documentation and assessment of a community renewal project: A case of an Israeli kibbutz. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles, 1976 .

15.

Tax, S. The Fox Project. Human Organization, 1958, 17, 17-19.

16.

Wilensky, H.L. , & Lebeaux, C.N. Industrial society and social welfare. New York : Russell Sage, 1950.

17.

Wolins, M. Comments. Social Service Review, 1956 , 30, 362-369.