The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the evaluations of
175 students differentiated by Carl Jung's psychotypology when they wereinvolved
in
either
a
session
of
nonverbal
communication
experiences
or
asession
of
fantasy
experiences.
The
significant
findings
were
as
follows:intuitive
types
preferred
the
two
experiences
more
than
the
thinking
types; extraverts
preferred
the
two
experiences
more
than
the
introverts;
and
thefeeling
types
preferred
the
nonverbal
communication
experiences
morethan
the
fantasy
experiences.
Thus,
it
seems
evident
that
some
of
theJungian psychological types prefer different structured experiences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anast, P.Determinants of mass media preferences. Journalism Quarterly , 1965, 43, 729-732.
2.
Betz, R.Effects of group counseling as an adjunctive practicum experience . Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1969, 16, 528-533.
3.
Bieri, J., & Blacher, E.External and internal stimulus factors in Rorschach performance. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1956, 20, 1-7.
4.
Carlson, R., & Levy, N.Studies of Jungian typology: Memory, social perception, and social action . Journal of Personality, 1973, 41, 559-576.
5.
Carlson, R., & Parker, J.Personality and aesthetic sensitivity. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 1969, 33, 530-534.
6.
Child, I.L.Personality correlates of aesthetic judgment in college students. Journal of Personality, 1965, 33, 476-511.
7.
Conary, F.An investigation of the variability of behavioral response to Jungian psychological types to select educational variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Auburn, 1965.
8.
Cooper, J., & Scalise, C.Dissonance produced by deviations from life styles: The interaction of Jungian typology and conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 566-571.
9.
Corocoran, D.W.J.The relationship between introversion and salivation. American Journal of Psychology, 1964, 77,298-300.
10.
Eysenck, H.J.Eysenck on extraversion. New York: John Wiley, 1973.
11.
Eysenck, S.B.G., & Eysenck, H.J.Salivary response to lemon juice as a measure ofintroversion. Perceptual and Motor Skills,1967, 24,1047-1053.
12.
Francis, R.D.Introversion and isolation tolerance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1969, 28. 534.
13.
Fretz, B.F., & Schmidt, L.D.Comparison of improvers and nonimprovers in an educational skills course. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1967, 14, 175-176.
14.
Freud, S.The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 18). London: Hogarth Press, 1920.
15.
Insel, S.A., Reese, C.S., & Alexander, B.B.Self-presentations in relation to internal and external referrents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical psychology , 1968, 32, 389-395.
16.
Jung, C.G.Psychological types (CW6. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976.
17.
Jung, C.G., & Rivkin, F.The associations of normal subjects. In C. G. Jung (Ed.), Experimental researches (CW2. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press , 1973.
18.
Lewis, H.R., & Streitfeld, H.S.Growth games: How to tune in yourself, your family, your friends. New York: Bantam Books, 1972.
19.
Mendlesohn, G.A.Effects of client personality and client-counselor similarity on the duration of counseling: A replication and extension. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1966, 13, 228-234. (a)
20.
Mendlesohn, G.A.Review of Myers-Briggs type indicator. In O. K. Buros (Ed.), The sixth mental measurement yearbook . Highland Park, NJ: The Gryphon Press, 1966. (b)
21.
Mendlesohn, G.A., & Geller, M.H.Effects of counselor-client similarity on the outcome of counseling . Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1963, 10, 71-77.
22.
Mendlesohn, G.A., & Kirk, B.A.Personality differences between students who do and do not use a counseling facility. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1962, 9, 341-346.
23.
Morris, K. T., & Cinnamon, K. M. (Eds.). Controversial issues in human relations training groups. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1976.
Reich, W.Character analysis. New York: Farrah, Straus and Giroux, 1949.
26.
Reynolds, R.J., & Hope, A.G.Typology as a moderating variable in success in science. Psychological Reports, 1970, 26, 711-716.
27.
Rezler, A.G., Mrtek, R.G., & Gutmann, C.M.Personality correlates of persistent high and low achievers. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 1975 , 39, 236-238.
28.
Rezler, A.G., Mrtek, R.G., & Monasse, H.R.Linking career choice to personality types: A preliminary analysis . American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 1976, 40, 121-125.
29.
Schutz, W.Joy: Expanding human awareness. New York: Grove Press, 1967.
30.
Shapiro, K.J., & Alexander, I.E.Extraversion-introversion affiliation and anxiety . Journal of Personality, 1969, 37, 387-406.
31.
Sheldon, W.H.Varieties of human physique: An introduction to constitutional psychology . Darien, CT: Hafner Publishing , 1970.
32.
Steele, F.J.Personality and the "laboratory style." The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1968, 4, 25-45.
33.
Stevens, J.O.Awareness: Exploring, experimenting, experiencing. Moab, UT: Real People Press, 1971 .
34.
Stricker, L.J., & Ross, J.An assessment of some structural properties of the Jungian personality typology . Journal of Abnorm.al and Social Psychology, 1964, 68, 62-71.
35.
Von Franz, M.L.The inferior function. In M. L. Von Franz and J. Hillman (Eds.), Lectures on Jung's typology. Zurich, Switzerland: Spring Publication, 1971.
36.
Witzig, J.A study of relationship between Jung's typology and therapeutic modality . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon , 1976.
37.
Zweben, J.A., & Hammann, J.A.Prescribed games: A theoretical perspective on the use of group techniques . Psychotherapy, 1970, 7, 22-27.
