The thesis of this paper is that female participants in educational
personal growth groups often have needs and goals that are different
from those of male participants. Theoretical and research evidence
substantiating the necessity for differential approaches to change in
men and women are presented. A model to facilitate the goal attainment
of women is suggested. The model contains a clear task orientation and a
focus on behavioral change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Balswick, J., & Peek, C.The inexpressive male: A tragedy of American society. Family Coordinator, 1971, 20, 363-368.
2.
Bardwick, J.M.Psychology of women. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.
3.
Barry, H., Bacon, M.K., & Child I.L. A cross-cultural survey of some sex differences in socialization . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1957, 55, 327-332.
4.
Bebout, J.Typologies of intensive small groups. Presented at the Third National Conference About the Teaching of Group Psychology , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, February 1977.
5.
Bebout, J., & Gordon, B.The value of encounter. In L. N. Solomon & B. Berzon (Eds.), New perspectives on encounter groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1972.
6.
Bem, S.L.Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 634-643.
7.
Bem, S.L.Bem sex-role inventory (BSRI. In J. E. Jones & J. W. Pfeiffer (Eds.), The 1977 annual handbookfor groupfacilitators. San Diego, CA: University Associates, 1977.
8.
Also in C. G. Carney & S. L. McMahon (Eds.), Exploring contemporary male/female roles: A facilitator's guide. San Diego, CA: University Associates, 1977.
9.
Biberman, G.Trainer behavior in a T-group setting: A survey of current practice . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University , 1978.
10.
Block, J.H.Conceptions of sex role: Some cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives . American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 512-526.
11.
Buchanan, R., & Reisel, J.Differentiating human relations training laboratories. In R. Golembiewski & A. Blumberg (Eds.), Sensitivity training and the laboratory approach (3rd ed.). Itasca, IL : F. E. Peacock, 1977.
12.
Cohen, M.B.Personal identity and sexual identity. Psychiatry , 1966, 29, 1-14.
13.
Deutsch, H.Psychology of women (2 vols.). New York: Grune and Stratton, 1944 -1945.
14.
Freud, S.Female sexuality. InternationalJournal of Psychoanalysis , 1932,13, 281-297.
15.
Freud, S.[New introductory lectures in psychoanalysis] ( J. Strachey, Ed. and trans.). New York : Norton, 1965. (Originally published, 1933.)
16.
Heilbrun, A.B.Sex differences in identification learning. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1965, 106, 185-193.
17.
Heilbrun, A.B., & Fromme, D.K.Parental identification of late adolescents and level of adjustment: The importance of parent-model attributes, ordinal position, and sex of the child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1965 , 107, 49-59.
18.
Johnson, M.M.Sex role learning in the nuclear family. Child Development , 1963, 34,319-334.
19.
Jourard, S.M.The transparent self. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1971.
20.
Jourard, S.M., & Landsman, M.J.Cognition, cathexis, and the "dyadic effect" in men's self disclosing behavior. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly , 1960, 6, 178-186.
21.
Jourard, S.M., & Lasakow, P.Some factors in self disclosure. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 1958, 56, 91-98.
22.
Kagan, J.Acquisition and significance of sex typing and sex role identity. In M. Hoffman & L. Hoffman (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 1). New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1964.
23.
Kagan, J., & Moss, H.A.From birth to maturity. New York: John Wiley, 1962.
24.
Kanter, R.M.On ending female tokenism in T-groups. In R. Golembiewski & A. Blumberg (Eds.), Sensitivity training and the laboratory approach (3rd Ed.). Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock, 1977.
25.
Lieberman, M., & Bond, G.The problem of being a woman: A survey of 1,700 women in consciousness-raising groups. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1976, 12, 363-379.
26.
Maccoby, E.E., & Jacklin, C.N.Psychology of sex differences. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1974.
27.
Marks, P.An assessment of the diagnostic process in a child guidance setting . Psychological Monographs, 1961, 75 (No. 507).
28.
Mead, M.Male and female: A study of the sexes in a changing world. New York: William Morrow, 1949.
29.
Mischel, W.A social learning view of sex differences in behavior. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1966.
30.
Nagera, H.Female sexuality and the Oedipus complex. New York : Jason Aronson, 1973.
31.
Parloff, M.Group therapy and the small-group field: An encounter. In C. Sager & H. S. Kaplan (Eds.), Progress in group and family therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1972 .
32.
Parsons, T., & Bales, R. (Eds.). Family, socialization and Interaction Process . New York: Free Press, 1955.
33.
Rogers, C.Carl Rogers on encounter groups. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.
34.
Schmale, A.H.Relation of separation and depression to disease. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1958, 20, 259-277.
35.
Sherman, J.Social values, feminity, and the development of female compe- , tence . Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32(3), 181-195.
36.
Weir, J.The personal growth laboratory. In K. Benne , L. Bradford, J. Gibb, & R. Lippitt (Eds.), The laboratory method of changing and learning . Palo Alto, CA: Science & Behavior Books, 1975.
37.
Wheelan, S.The effect of personal growth and assertive training classes on female sex-role self-concept. Group & Organization Studies, 1978, 3, 239-244. (a)
38.
Wheelan, S.Theoretical assumptions and practical description of the planned change model of personal growth. The Center for the Study of Psychoeducational Processes Monograph Series, Temple University, 1978 (Serial No. 107MI). (b)
