The purpose of this review was to examine published research on small-group
development done in the last ten years that would constitute an empirical test of
Tuckman's (1965) hypothesis that groups go through the stages of "forming,"
"storming," "norming," and "performing." Of the twenty-two studies reviewed,
only one set out to directly test this hypothesis, although many of the others could
be related to it. Following a review of these studies, a fifth stage, "adjourning,"
was added to the hypothesis, and more empirical work was recommended.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adelson, J.Feedback and group development. Small Group Behavior , 19756(4), 389-401.
2.
Braaten, L.J.Developmental phases of encounter groups and related intensive groups: A critical review of models and a new proposal. Interpersonal Development , 1974-75,5, 112-129.
3.
Dunphy, D.Phases, roles and myths in self-analytic groups. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1968, 4(2), 195-225.
4.
Gibbard, G., & Hartman, J.The oedipal paradigm in group development: A clinical and empirical study . Small Group Behavior, 1973, 4(3), 305-349.
5.
Heckel, R., Holmes, G., & Salzberg, H.Emergence of distinct verbal phases in group therapy. Psychological Reports, 1967, 21, 630-632.
6.
Heckel, R.V., Holmes, G.R., & Rosecrans, C.J.A factor analytic study of process variables in group therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1971, 27(1), 146-150.
7.
Lacoursiere, R.A group method to facilitate learning during the stages of a psychiatric affiliation . International Journal of Group Psychotherapy , 1974, 24, 342-351.
8.
Liebowitz, B.A method for the analysis of the thematic structure of T-groups. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1972, 8(2), 149-173.
9.
Lundgren, D.C.Trainer style and patterns of group development. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971, 7(6), 689-709.
10.
Lundgren, D.C.Attitudinal and behavioral correlates of emergent status in training groups . The Journal of Social Psychology, 1973, 90, 141-153.
11.
Mann, R.D.The development of the member-trainer relationship in self-analytic groups . In C. L. Cooper & I. L. Mangham (Eds.), T-groups: A survey of research. London: Wiley-Interscience , 1971.
12.
Mann, R.D.Interpersonal styles and group development. New York: John Wiley, 1967.
Runkel, P.J., Lawrence, M.Oldfield, S., Rider, M., Clark, C.Stages of group development : An empirical test of Tuckman's hypothesis . The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971, 7(2), 180-193.
15.
Shambaugh, P., & Kanter, S.Spouses under stress: Group meetings with spouses of patients on hemodialysis . American Journal of Psychiatry, 1969, 125, 928-936.
16.
Smith, W.M.Observations over the lifetime of a small isolated group; structure, danger, boredom, and vision. Psychological Reports, 1966,19, 475-514.
17.
Spitz, H., & Sadock, B.Psychiatric training of graduate nursing students. N. Y State Journal of Medicine, June 1, 1973 , pp. 1334-1338.
18.
Tucker, D.M.Some relationships between individual and group development. Human Development, 1973, 16, 249-272.
19.
Tuckman, B.W.Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin , 1965, 63(6), 384-399.
20.
Yalom, I.The theory andpractice of group psychotherapy. New York : Basic Books, 1970.
21.
Zurcher, L.A., Jr. Stages of development in poverty program neighborhood action committees . The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1969, 5(2), 223-258.
