AguinisH.CascioW. F.RamaniR. S. (2017). Science’s reproducibility and replicability crisis: International business is not immune. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(6), 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0081-0
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
4.
AntonakisJ. (2017). On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.01.006
5.
AntonakisJ.BendahanS.JacquartP.LaliveR. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010
6.
AnvariF.LakensD. (2018). The replicability crisis and public trust in psychological science. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 3(3), 266–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2019.1684822
BastardozN.MatthewsM. J.SajonsG. B.RansomT.KelemenT. K.MatthewsS. H. (2023). Instrumental variables estimation: Assumptions, pitfalls, and guidelines. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(2023), Article 101673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101673
9.
BerghD. D.PowellR.ZhaoY.SchwabA. (2025). Testing and interpreting replication studies: Insights from confidence intervals and Bayesian analyses. Strategic Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270251410355
10.
BettisR. A.HelfatC. E.ShaverJ. M. (2016). The necessity, logic, and forms of replication. Strategic Management Journal, 37(11), 2193–2203. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2580
11.
BowlingN. A.SessaV. I.ShafferJ. A.BanksG. C. (2026). Read my lips: No new constructs! construct proliferation as a threat to the future of I-O psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2025.10067.
12.
BrandtM. J.IJzermanH.DijksterhuisA.FarachF. J.GellerJ.Giner-SorollaR.GrangeJ. A.PeruginiM.SpiesJ. R.van ’t VeerA. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50(1), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005
13.
BrikerR.GerpottF. H. (2024). Publishing registered reports in management and applied psychology: Common beliefs and best practices. Organizational Research Methods, 27(4), 588–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281231210309
14.
CarstenM.Clapp-SmithR.Alexander HaslamS.BastardozN.GootyJ.ConnellyS.SpainS. (2023). Doing better leadership science via replications and registered reports. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(4), Article 101712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101712
15.
CastilleC. M.KreamerL. M.AlbrittonB. H.BanksG. C.RogelbergS. G. (2022). The open science challenge: Adopt one practice that enacts widely shared values. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37(3), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09806-2
16.
DauL. A.SantangeloG. D.van WitteloostuijnA. (2022). Replication studies in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00471-w
17.
De BoeckP.JeonM. (2018). Perceived crisis and reforms: Issues, explanations, and remedies. Psychological Bulletin, 144(7), 757–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000154
FellnhoferK.WennbergK.AllisonT. H.AreniusP.GishJ. J.PollackJ. M. (2026). Enhancing transparency and replicability in entrepreneurship research with preregistrations, registered reports, and registered revisions: A call for papers. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 50(3), 643–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587251401175
20.
GerpottF. H. (2026). Publishing registered reports: A primer for putting their potential into practice. Zeitschrift Für Arbeits- Und Organisationspsychologie A&O. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000464
21.
GriepY.ObenauerW. G.CruzK. S.DavisW.HarveyP.PintoJ.RappT.RauD.Anisman-RazinM.BennettA.BojovicN.BranickiL.CanerT.DeJordyR.DjurdjevicE.FennemanA.FennemanJ.FergusonA.FidaR.WangG. (2026). Getting published in, and reviewing for. Group & Organization Management.
22.
HammondM. M.SchynsB.LesterG. V.Clapp-SmithR.ThomasJ. S. (2023). The romance of leadership: Rekindling the fire through replication of Meindl and Ehrlich. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(4), Article 101538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101538
23.
HillA. D.JohnsonS. G.GrecoL. M.O’BoyleE. H.WalterS. L. (2021). Endogeneity: A review and agenda for the methodology-practice divide affecting micro and macro research. Journal of Management, 47(1), 105–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320960533
24.
HüffmeierJ.MazeiJ.SchultzeT. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009
25.
JonesS. R. G. (1992). Was there a Hawthorne effect?American Journal of Sociology, 98(3), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1086/230046
26.
KöhlerT.CortinaJ. M. (2021). Play it again, Sam! An analysis of constructive replication in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management, 47(2), 488–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319843985
27.
KraimerM. L. (2023). Introducing Journal of Management Scientific Reports (JOMSR). Journal of Management Scientific Reports, 1(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/27550311221142152
28.
LevittB. S. D.ListJ. A. (2011). Was there really a Hawthorne effect at the Hawthorne plant? An analysis of the original illumination experiments. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(1), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.3.1.224
29.
LindsayD. S. (2017). Preregistered direct replications in psychological science. Psychological Science, 28(9), 1191–1192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617718802
30.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2020). Building a theory by induction: The example of goal setting theory. Organizational Psychology Review, 10(3–4), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386620921931
31.
MathieuJ. E. (2016). The problem with [in] management theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(8), 1132–1141. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2114
32.
MeindlJ. R.EhrlichS. B. (1987). The romance of leadership and the evaluation of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 30(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.5465/255897
33.
NosekB. A.ErringtonT. M.HaberN.StankovT.TynerA. H. (2026). A brief glossary of terms about repeatability: Replicability, robustness, and reproducibility. https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/mqfp4_v1
34.
ObenauerW. G. (2024). Designing, executing, and publishing replication research: Best practices for successfully taking replication ideas from conceptualization to publication. Journal of Management Scientific Reports, 2(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/27550311241232661
35.
ObenauerW. G. (2025). Does organizational performance always impact the emergence of Asian American leaders? Using replication to examine how leadership prototypes impact perceptions of fit. Journal of Management Scientific Reports, 4(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/27550311251396562
36.
ObenauerW. G.GriepY. (2026). Is the problem developmental review, or the development of peer review?Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 19(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2025.10050.
37.
ObenauerW. G.KalsherM. J. (2023). Is white always the standard? Using replication to revisit and extend what we know about the leadership prototype. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(4), Article 101633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101633
38.
ObenauerW. G.SiewekeJ.BastardozN.ArvateP. R.GazdagB. A.HentschelT. (2024). Are women strategic leaders more effective during a crisis than men strategic leaders? A causal analysis of the relationship between strategic leader gender and outcomes during the COVID-19 crisis. The Leadership Quarterly, 35(6), 101812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2024.101812
39.
PagellM. (2021). Replication without repeating ourselves: Addressing the replication crisis in operations and supply chain management research. Journal of Operations Management, 67(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1120
40.
PatersonT. A.HarmsP. D.SteelP.CredéM. (2016). An assessment of the magnitude of effect sizes: Evidence from 30 years of meta-analysis in management. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051815614321
41.
PillutlaM. M.ThauS. (2013). Organizational sciences’ obsession with “that’s interesting!”’: Consequences and an alternative. Organizational Psychology Review, 3(2), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386613479963
42.
PodsakoffP. M.PodsakoffN. P. (2019). Experimental designs in management and leadership research: Strengths, limitations, and recommendations for improving publishability. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.11.002
43.
RosetteA. S.LeonardelliG. J.PhillipsK. W. (2008). The white standard: Racial bias in leader categorization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 758–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.758
44.
SchwabA.AguinisH.BambergerP.HodgkinsonG. P.ShapiroD. L.StarbuckW. H.TsuiA. S. (2023). How replication studies can improve doctoral student education. Journal of Management Scientific Reports, 1(1), 18–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/27550311231156880
45.
SelmerJ.ShafferM.GuttormsenD. S. A.StoermerS.PintoL. H.ChenY. P.LauringJ. (2023). Guest editorial: Only replications. Journal of Global Mobility, 11(3), 297–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGM-09-2023-102
46.
SergentK.StajkovicA. D. (2020). Women’s leadership is associated with fewer deaths during the COVID-19 crisis: Quantitative and qualitative analyses of United States Governors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(8), 771–783. https://doi/10.1037/apl0000577.
47.
ShaverJ. M. (2020). Causal identification through a cumulative body of research in the study of strategy and organizations. Journal of Management, 46(7), 1244–1256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319846272
48.
ShroutP. E.RodgersJ. L. (2018). Psychology, science, and knowledge construction: Broadening perspectives from the replication crisis. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845
49.
SiewekeJ.SantoniS. (2020). Natural experiments in leadership research: An introduction, review, and guidelines. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), Article 101338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101338
50.
SpectorP. E.AllenT. D.PoelmansS. A. Y.LapierreL. M.CooperC. L.O’DriscollM.SanchezJ. I.AbarcaN.AlexandrovaM.BehamB.BroughP.FerreiroP.FraileG.LuC.-Q.LuL.Moreno-VelazquezI.PagonM.PitariuH.SalamatovV.Ling SiuO. (2007). Cross-national differences in relationships of work demands, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions with work-family conflict. Personnel Psychology, 60(4), 805–835. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00092.x
51.
StandingL. G.GrenierM.LaneE. A.RobertsM. S.SykesS. J. (2014). Using replication projects in teaching research methods. Psychology Teaching Review, 20(1), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsptr.2014.20.1.96
52.
SuttonR. I.StawB. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393788
53.
UbakaA.LuX.GutierrezL. (2023). Testing the generalizability of the white leadership standard in the post-Obama era. Leadership Quarterly, 34(4), Article 101591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101591