AguinisH.SolarinoA. M. (2019). Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants. Strategic Management Journal, 40(8), 1291–1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3015
2.
AguinisH.VillamorI.RamaniR. S. (2021). MTurk research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Management, 47(4), 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320969787
3.
AllenT. D.FrenchK.AveryD. R.KingE.WiermikB. M. (2025). Developmental reviewing: Is it really good for science?Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
4.
AntonakisJ.BendahanS.JacquartP.LaliveR. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010
5.
BanksG. C.WoznyjH. M.MansfieldC. A. (2023). Where is “behavior” in organizational behavior? A call for a revolution in leadership research and beyond. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(6), Article 101581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101581
BraunV.JowseyT.ClarkeV.PenneyD. (2024). Why we reject the use of generative AI in reflexive qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry.
8.
BusenbarkJ. R.YoonH.GamacheD. L.WithersM. C. (2022). Omitted variable bias: Examining management research with the impact threshold of a confounding variable (ITCV). Journal of Management, 48(1), 17–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211006458
9.
CarstenM.Clapp-SmithR.Alexander HaslamS.BastardozN.GootyJ.ConnellyS.SpainS. (2023). Doing better leadership science via replications and registered reports. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(4), Article 101712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101712
10.
CastillaE. J. (2005). Gender, race, and meritocracy in organizational careers. AJS; American journal of sociology, 113(6), 1479–1526. https://doi.org/10.1086/588738
CastilleC. M.KreamerL. M.AlbrittonB. H.BanksG. C.RogelbergS. G. (2022). The open science challenge: Adopt one practice that enacts widely shared values. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37(3), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09806-2
13.
ChanD. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.83.2.234
CinelliC.ForneyA.PearlJ. (2024). A crash course in good and bad controls. Sociological Methods & Research, 53(3), 1071–1104. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221099552
16.
CruzK. S.ZagenczykT. J.GriepY. (2022). (Re)introducing a new section generally and a special section in this issue specifically: GOMusings. Group & Organization Management, 47(5), 891–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221117436
17.
DormannC.GuthierC.CortinaJ. M. (2020). Introducing continuous time meta-analysis (CoTiMA). Organizational Research Methods, 23(4), 620–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119847277
18.
DormannC.van de VenB. (2014). Timing in methods for studying psychosocial factors at work. In DollardM.ShimazuA.NordinR. B.BroughP.TuckeyM. (Eds.), Psychosocial factors at work in the Asia Pacific (pp. 89–116). Springer.
19.
GardnerW. L. (2015). Riddle me this: What do courage, rhetoric, neuroscience, socialization, revenge, and ceo personality have in common? Answer: Outstanding 2014 GOM articles. Group & Organization Management, 40(5), 591–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115604753
20.
GardnerW. L. (2016). Riddle me this: What do co-evolution, leveraging leaders, transformational leadership, psychological contracts, the “treo” and sinking versus swimming together have in common? answer: outstanding 2015 gom articles: what do co-evolution, leveraging leaders, transformational leadership, psychological contracts, the “treo” and sinking versus swimming together have in common? Answer: Outstanding 2015 GOM articles. Group & Organization Management, 42(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601116680444
21.
GardnerW. L. (2017). Riddle me this: What do mentoring, TMI, autonomy, relational enhancement, team adaptiveness, and managerial gender diversity have in common? Answer: Outstanding 2016 GOM articles. Group & Organization Management, 42(6), 751–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601117741815
22.
GardnerW. L. (2018). Riddle me this: What do mergers and acquisitions, remote workers, management m-theory, empowered leadership, competitive human resource practices, and positivity within dynamic teams have in common? Answer: Outstanding 2017 GOM articles. Group & Organization Management, 43(6), 863–870. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601118812116
23.
GardnerW. L. (2019). Riddle me this: What do innovation implementation, a powerful ceo, functional diversity, paradoxical virtual leadership, coworker mentoring, and surface acting have in common? Answer: Outstanding 2018 GOM articles. Group & Organization Management, 44(6), 1023–1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601119880971
24.
GardnerW. L. (2020). Riddle me this: What do top management team boundary spanning, team conflict trajectories, team creativity, faultlines, grit, and global virtual teams, have in common? Answer: Outstanding 2019 GOM articles. Group & Organization Management, 45(6), 747–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601120978313
25.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
26.
GriepY. (2022a). Greetings from the new editor: Directions for group & organization management. Group & Organization Management, 47(6), 1095–1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221115980
27.
GriepY. (2022b). Riddle me this: What does the covid-19 crisis, helping behavior, temporality, work interruptions, and the gig economy have in common? They are GOM's 2021 best papers. Group & Organization Management, 47(5), 1082–1088. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221121709
28.
GriepY. (2023). Riddle me this: What do the working class, workplace mavericks, and neurodiverse employees have in common? They are GOM’s 2022 best papers. Group & Organization Management, 48(5), 1247–1253. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011231188565
29.
GriepY. (2024). Riddle me this: What do leader green behaviors, inclusion, and workplace gossip have in common? They are GOM's 2024 best papers. Group & Organization Management, 49(4), 795–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011241253062
30.
GriepY. (2025). Riddle me this: Justice thresholds, “moving-on” magic, and a map to workplace well-being- GOM's 2025 best papers. Group & Organization Management.
31.
GriepY.VranjesI.KraakJ. M.DuddaL.LiY. (2021). Start small, not random: Why does justifying your time-lag matter?Spanish Journal of Psychology, 24, Article e45. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2021.42
32.
KöhlerT.CortinaJ. M. (2021). Play it again, Sam! an analysis of constructive replication in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management, 47(2), 488–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319843985
33.
KraimerM. L. (2023). Introducing journal of management scientific reports (JOMSR). Journal of Management Scientific Reports, 1(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/27550311221142152
34.
LemoineG. J.GhahremaniH.NorrisK. (2025). The curious case of cross‐level effects: Refining our understanding to match our methods. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.70010
35.
MändliF.RönkköM. (2023). To Omit or to include? Integrating the frugal and prolific perspectives on control variable use. Organizational Research Methods, 28(3), 114–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281231221703
36.
MaynardM. T.LandonL. B.KennedyD. M. (2025). Good things can come in smaller packages if given the chance: Let’s not forget that when conducting organizational team research. Group & Organization Management, 50(5-6), 1597–1612. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011241309238
37.
NguyenD. C.WelchC. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in qualitative data analysis: Analyzing—or just chatting?Organizational Research Methods, 28(4), 799–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281251377154
38.
ObenauerW. G. (2024). Designing, executing, and publishing replication research: Best practices for successfully taking replication ideas from conceptualization to publication. Journal of Management Scientific Reports, 2(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/27550311241232661
39.
ObenauerW. G. (2025). Engage in open science practices with the anonymity of Batman: Protecting your secret identity during peer review. Group & Organization Management.
40.
PeerE.RothschildD.GordonA.EverndenZ.DamerE. (2022). Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behavior Research Methods, 54(4), 1643–1662.
41.
SelmerJ.ShafferM.GuttormsenD. S. A.StoermerS.PintoL. H.ChenY.-P.&LauringJ. (2023). Guest editorial: Only replications. Journal of Global Mobility: The Home of Expatriate Management Research, 11(3), 297–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/jgm-09-2023-102