Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study employs institutional theory to explore the funding tendencies of public and private capital. Specifically, we analyze the funding structures of private equity investors (private capital) and government agencies (public capital) to understand how their institutional frameworks influence approaches to financing new ventures. By examining these differences, we demonstrate how the sources and dynamics of private versus public funding shape decision-making processes and priorities in venture financing. Our analysis highlights contrasting preferences: private equity investors prioritize emotionally resonant and character-driven entrepreneurial narratives, whereas government agencies favor entrepreneurs who emphasize logical and structured approaches. This study is based on an examination of 266 companies that sought funding from both government agencies, such as the Department of Defense, and private equity firms.

Keywords

government institutional theory investment new ventures private equity public capital D81 D82 D73 G41 H30 M21

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldrich

H. E.

Fiol

C. M.

(1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9412190214

Alperovych

Hübner

Lobet

(2015). How does governmental versus private venture capital backing affect a firm’s efficiency? Evidence from Belgium. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4), 508–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.11.001

Ang

Chen

Goetzmann

Phalippou

(2014). Estimating private equity returns from limited partner cash flows. The Journal of Finance, 73(4), 1751–1783. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12688

Anglin

A. H.

Short

J. C.

Drover

Stevenson

R. M.

McKenny

A. F.

Allison

T. H.

(2018). The power of positivity? The influence of positive psychological capital language on crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 470–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.03.003

Aren

Hamamci

H. N.

(2020). Relationship between risk aversion, risky investment intention, investment choices: Impact of personality traits and emotion. Kybernetes, 49(11), 2651–2682. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-07-2019-0455

Aristotle . (2019). The art of rhetoric: University of Chicago Press.

Bai

Bernstein

Dev

Lerner

(2021). The dance between government and private investors: Public entrepreneurial finance around the globe (No. w28744). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Behfar

S. K.

Shekhtman

Crowcroft

(2024). Competitive funding and academic-industry collaboration: Policy trends and insights. Data & Policy, 6, Article e82. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2024.81

Bird

Schjoedt

(2009). Entrepreneurial behavior: Its nature, scope, recent research, and agenda for future research. In Carsrud

A. L.

Brännback

(Eds.), Understanding the entrepreneurial mind (pp. 327–358). Springer.

10.

Bovens

M. A. P.

Goodin

R. E.

Schillemans

(Eds.), (2014). The Oxford handbook public accountability. Oxford Handbooks.

11.

Bowman

E. H.

(1984). Content analysis of annual reports for corporate strategy and risk. Interfaces, 14(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.14.1.61

12.

Brown

A. D.

Ainsworth

Grant

(2012). The rhetoric of institutional change. Organization Studies, 33(3), 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611435598

13.

Brunswicker

Priego

L. P.

Almirall

(2019). Transparency in policy making: A complexity view. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.005

14.

Bruton

G. D.

Ahlstrom

H. L.

(2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00390.x

15.

Busenbark

J. R.

Yoon

Gamache

D. L.

Withers

M. C.

(2022). Omitted variable bias: Examining management research with the impact threshold of a confounding variable (ITCV). Journal of Management, 48(1), 17–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211006458

16.

Cable

D. M.

Shane

(1997). A prisoner’s dilemma approach to entrepreneur-venture capitalist relationships. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 142–176. https://doi.org/10.2307/259227

17.

Campbell

J. Y.

Vuolteenaho

(2004). Inflation illusion and stock prices. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041301533

18.

Chandler

G. N.

McLeod

M. S.

Broberg

J. C.

McKelvie

DeTienne

D. R.

(2024). Customer engagement patterns and new venture outcomes. Small Business Economics, 63(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00843-6

19.

Chen

X. P.

Yao

Kotha

(2009). Entrepreneur passion and preparedness in business plan presentations: A persuasion analysis of venture capitalists’ funding decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.36462018

20.

Cooper

A. C.

Woo

C. Y.

Dunkelberg

W. C.

(1988). Entrepreneurs’ perceived chances for success. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(88)90020-1

21.

Cumming

Kumar

Lim

W. M.

Pandey

(2023). Mapping the venture capital and private equity research: A bibliometric review and future research agenda. Small Business Economics, 61(1), 173–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00684-9

22.

Davies

H. J.

Schaafsma

(2023). Willingness-to-pay for urban ecosystem services provision under objective and subjective uncertainty. Resource and Energy Economics, 71, Article 101344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2022.101344

23.

De Clercq

Fried

V. H.

Lehtonen

Sapienza

H. J.

(2006). An entrepreneur's guide to the venture capital galaxy. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(3), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2006.21903483

24.

Deephouse

D. L.

(1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024–1039. https://doi.org/10.2307/256722

25.

de la Cuesta

Martin

Milner

H. V.

Nielson

D. L.

(2023). Do indirect taxes bite? How hiding taxes erases accountability demands from citizens. The Journal of Politics, 85(4), 1305–1320. https://doi.org/10.1086/724962

26.

Desrieux

(2009). Owner or holder? A critical study of property rights in public services. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 165(2), 230–249. https://doi.org/10.1628/093245609789273259

27.

Duriau

V. J.

Reger

R. K.

Pfarrer

M. D.

(2007). A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106289252

28.

Ehrlich

S. B.

De Noble

A. F.

Moore

Weaver

R. R.

(1994). After the cash arrives: A comparative study of venture capital and private investor involvement in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90027-2

29.

Evert

R. E.

Payne

G. T.

Moore

C. B.

McLeod

M. S.

(2018). Top management team characteristics and organizational virtue orientation: An empirical examination of IPO firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 28(4), 427–461. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2018.3

30.

Faria

J. R.

Ogura

Prado

Boudreaux

C. J.

(2023). Government investments and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 61(4), 1657–1670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00743-9

31.

Fazekas

Becsky-Nagy

(2021). A new theoretical model of government backed venture capital funding. Acta Oeconomica, 71(3), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2021.00024

32.

Fiol

C. M.

(1995). Corporate communications: Comparing executives’ private and public statements. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 522–536. https://doi.org/10.2307/256691

33.

Foo

M. D.

(2011). Emotions and entrepreneurial opportunity evaluation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(2), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00357.x

34.

Gaventa

McGee

(2013). The impact of transparency and accountability initiatives. Development Policy Review, 31(s1), s3–s28. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12017

35.

Goodman

(1994). What makes an entrepreneur. Inc. https://www.inc.com/magazine/19941001/3131.html

36.

Green

S. E.

(2004). A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 653–669. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159076

37.

Hansson

S. O.

(2010). Risk: Objective or subjective, facts or values. Journal of Risk Research, 13(2), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870903126226

38.

Harrison

T. M.

Sayogo

D. S.

(2014). Transparency, participation, and accountability practices in open government: A comparative study. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.08.002

39.

Hayward

M. L.

Forster

W. R.

Sarasvathy

S. D.

Fredrickson

B. L.

(2010). Beyond hubris: How highly confident entrepreneurs rebound to venture again. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(6), 569–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.03.002

40.

Hoefer

R. L.

Green Jr

S. E.

(2016). A rhetorical model of institutional decision making: The role of rhetoric in the formation and change of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 130–150. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0330

41.

Holton

G. A.

(2004). Defining risk. Financial Analysts Journal, 60(6), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v60.n6.2669

42.

Huang

(2018). The role of investor gut feel in managing complexity and extreme risk. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1821–1847. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.1009

43.

Huang

Pearce

J. L.

(2015). Managing the unknowable: The effectiveness of early-stage investor gut feel in entrepreneurial investment decisions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(4), 634–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839215597270

44.

Islam

Fremeth

Marcus

(2018). Signaling by early stage startups: US government research grants and venture capital funding. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.10.001

45.

Juma

Payne

G. T.

(2004). Intellectual capital and performance of new venture high-tech firms. International Journal of Innovation Management, 8(03), 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919604001076

46.

Karlsson

Honig

(2009). Judging a business by its cover: An institutional perspective on new ventures and the business plan. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.10.003

47.

Knight

F. H.

(1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Hart, Schaffner and Marx.

48.

Korber

McNaughton

R. B.

(2017). Resilience and entrepreneurship: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(7), 1129–1154. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-10-2016-0356

49.

Korteweg

Nagel

(2025). Risk-adjusted returns of private equity funds: A new approach. Review of Financial Studies, 38(9), 2557–2601. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhae067

50.

Kosack

Fung

(2014). Does transparency improve governance? Annual Review of Political Science, 17(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032210-144356

51.

Larrick

R. P.

Heath

(2009). Goal-induced risk taking in negotiation and decision making. Social Cognition, 27(3), 342–364. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.3.342

52.

Lehner

O. M.

Harrer

(2019). Crowdfunding revisited: A neo-institutional field-perspective. Venture Capital, 21(1), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2019.1560884

53.

Lerner

Nanda

(2020). Venture capital’s role in financing innovation: What we know and how much we still need to learn. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(3), 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.3.237

54.

Levie

Gimmon

(2008). Mixed signals: Why investors may misjudge first time high technology venture founders. Venture Capital, 10(3), 233–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691060802151820

55.

Ljungqvist

(2024). The economics of private equity: A critical review. Swedish House of Finance Research Paper, 24. https://doi.org/10.56227/24.1.10

56.

Martin

(2014). Taxation, loss aversion, and accountability: Theory and experimental evidence for taxation’s effect on citizen behavior. Yale University. Unpublished Paper.

57.

McKenny

A. F.

Aguinis

Short

J. C.

Anglin

A. H.

(2018). What doesn’t get measured does exist: Improving the accuracy of computer-aided text analysis. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2909–2933. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316657594

58.

McKenny

A. F.

Short

J. C.

Payne

G. T.

(2013). Using computer-aided text analysis to elevate constructs: An illustration using psychological capital. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 152–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112459910

59.

McLeod

M. S.

Moore

C. B.

Payne

G. T.

Sexton

J. C.

Evert

R. E.

(2018). Organizational virtue and stakeholder interdependence: An empirical examination of financial intermediaries and IPO firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(4), 785–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3021-1

60.

McLeod

M. S.

Payne

G. T.

Evert

R. E.

(2016). Organizational ethics research: A systematic review of methods and analytical techniques. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2436-9

61.

McLeod

M. S.

Sears

J. B.

Chandler

G. N.

Payne

G. T.

Brigham

K. H.

(2022). Rhetoric, risk, and investment: Letting the numbers speak for themselves. Journal of Management Studies, 59(7), 1657–1687. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12812

62.

Michalisin

M. D.

(2001). Validity of annual report assertions about innovativeness: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 53(1), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0148-2963(99)00118-6

63.

Mitteness

Sudek

Cardon

M. S.

(2012). Angel investor characteristics that determine whether perceived passion leads to higher evaluations of funding potential. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(5), 592–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.11.003

64.

Mulgan

(2019). The extended scope of accountability in public administration. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.

65.

J. N.

Lee

T. H.

Wong

S. C.

(2020). Factors influencing taxpayers’ willingness to pay tax: A study of SMEs in Klang valley. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 10(1), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarafms/v10-i1/7049

66.

Nguyen

Canh

N. P.

(2021). Formal and informal financing decisions of small businesses. Small Business Economics, 57(3), 1545–1567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00361-9

67.

Nosić

Weber

(2010). How riskily do I invest? The role of risk attitudes, risk perceptions, and overconfidence. Decision Analysis, 7(3), 282–301. https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1100.0178

68.

Oehler

Horn

Wedlich

(2018). Young adults’ subjective and objective risk attitude in financial decision making: Evidence from the lab and the field. Review of Behavioral Finance, 10(3), 274–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/rbf-07-2017-0069

69.

Oliver

(1997). Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 697–713. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199710)18:9<697::aid-smj909>3.0.co;2-c

70.

Ordóñez

L. D.

Schweitzer

M. E.

Galinsky

A. D.

Bazerman

M. H.

(2009). Goals gone wild: The systematic side effects of overprescribing goal setting. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2009.37007999

71.

Paler

(2013). Keeping the public purse: An experiment in windfalls, taxes, and the incentives to restrain government. American Political Science Review, 107(4), 706–725. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055413000415

72.

Paroutis

Heracleous

(2013). Discourse revisited: Dimensions and employment of first-order strategy discourse during institutional adoption. Strategic Management Journal, 34(8), 935–956. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2052

73.

Payne

G. T.

Brigham

K. H.

Broberg

J. C.

Moss

T. W.

Short

J. C.

(2011). Organizational virtue orientation and family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201121216

74.

Pollack

J. M.

Rutherford

M. W.

Nagy

B. G.

(2012). Preparedness and cognitive legitimacy as antecedents of new venture funding in televised business pitches. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 915–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00531.x

75.

Pulka

B. M.

Ramli

Mohamad

(2021). Entrepreneurial competencies, entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial network, government business support and SMEs performance. The moderating role of the external environment. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 28(4), 586–618. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsbed-12-2018-0390

76.

Rainey

H. G.

(2011). Goal ambiguity and the study of American bureaucracy. In The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy (pp. 231–251). Oxford University Press.

77.

Reisigl

(2008). Analyzing political rhetoric. In Wodak

Krżyzanowski

(Eds.), Qualitative discourse analysis in the social sciences (pp. 96–120). Palgrave Macmillan.

78.

Sager

(2018). Grants management: Observations on challenges and opportunities for reform. U.S. Government Accountability Office. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-18-676t

79.

Sahlman

W. A.

(1997). How to write a great business plan. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 98–108.

80.

Scott

W. R.

(1995). Institutions and organizations (vol. 2): Sage.

81.

Sears

J. B.

McLeod

M. S.

Evert

R. E.

Payne

G. T.

(2022). Alleviating concerns of misappropriation in corporate venture capital: Creating credible commitments and calculative trust. Strategic Organization, 20(2), 318–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020926174

82.

Shepherd

D. A.

(1999). Venture capitalists’ introspection: A comparison of ‘in use’ and ‘espoused’ decision policies. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(2), 76–87. https://www.proquest.com/docview/221010092/fulltextPDF/343FFED0F3BD49CCPQ/1?accountid=15042&sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals

83.

Shepherd

D. A.

Zacharakis

(2001). The venture capitalist-entrepreneur relationship: Control, trust and confidence in co-operative behaviour. Venture Capital, 3(2), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691060110042763

84.

Short

J. C.

Broberg

J. C.

Cogliser

C. C.

Brigham

K. H.

(2010). Construct validation using computer-aided text analysis (CATA) an illustration using entrepreneurial orientation. Organizational Research Methods, 13(2), 320–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109335949

85.

Sinyard

D. B.

(2013). The investment process used by private equity firms: Does the affect heuristic impact decision-making? Georgia State University.

86.

Steigenberger

Wilhelm

(2018). Extending signaling theory to rhetorical signals: Evidence from crowdfunding. Organization Science, 29(3), 529–546. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1195

87.

Steindl

(2013). The alignment of interests between the general and the limited partner in a private equity Fund—The ultimate governance nut to crack? The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation.

88.

Zhai

Karlsson

(2017). Beyond red tape and fools: Institutional theory in entrepreneurship research, 1992–2014. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(4), 505–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/etp.12218

89.

Suddaby

Greenwood

(2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35

90.

Thatcher

(2002). Delegation to independent regulatory agencies: Pressures, functions and contextual mediation. West European Politics, 25(1), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/713601588

91.

Tykvová

(2018). Venture capital and private equity financing: An overview of recent literature and an agenda for future research. Journal of Business Economics, 88(3), 325–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0874-4

92.

U.S. Department of the Treasury . (2025). March 2025 notice [PDF]. https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/March-2025-Notice.pdf

93.

U.S. Department of Defense . (2023). Countering unwanted influence in department-funded research at institutions of higher education. https://media.defense.gov/2023/Jun/29/2003251160/-1/-1/1/COUNTERING-UNWANTED-INFLUENCE-IN-DEPARTMENT-FUNDED-RESEARCH-AT-INSTITUTIONS-OF-HIGHER-EDUCATION.PDF

94.

Waddingham

J. A.

Chandler

J. A.

Alexander

K. C.

Zafar

Anglin

(2025). The leisure paradox for entrepreneurs: A neo-institutional theory perspective of disclosing leisure activities in crowdfunding pitches. Journal of Business Venturing, 40(2), Article 106467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2024.106467

95.

Welpe

I. M.

Spörrle

Grichnik

Michl

Audretsch

D. B.

(2012). Emotions and opportunities: The interplay of opportunity evaluation, fear, joy, and anger as antecedent of entrepreneurial exploitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(1), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00481.x

96.

Williamson

O. E.

(1999). Public and private bureaucracies: A transaction cost economics perspectives. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15(1), 306–342. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/15.1.306

97.

Wright

Robbie

Ennew

(1997). Venture capitalists and serial entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(3), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026(96)06115-0

98.

Frank

K. A.

(2021). Sensitivity analysis for network observations with applications to inferences of social influence effects. Network Science, 9(1), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/nws.2020.36

99.

Frank

K. A.

Maroulis

S. J.

Rosenberg

J. M.

(2019). Konfound: Command to quantify robustness of causal inferences. STATA Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata, 19(3), 523–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x19874223

100.

Zacharakis

A. L.

McMullen

J. S.

Shepherd

D. A.

(2007). Venture capitalists' decision policies across three countries: An institutional theory perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5), 691–708. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400291

101.

Zacharakis

A. L.

Meyer

G. D.

(1998). A lack of insight: Do venture capitalists really understand their own decision process? Journal of Business Venturing, 13(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026(97)00004-9

102.

Zachary

M. A.

Connelly

B. L.

Payne

G. T.

Tribble

L. L.

(2023). Virtue rhetoric in investor communications: Setting up for a letdown? Journal of Management, 49(2), 741–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211002622

103.

Zachary

M. A.

McKenny

Short

J. C.

Payne

G. T.

(2011). Family business and market orientation: Construct validation and comparative analysis. Family Business Review, 24(3), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486510396871

104.

Zimmerman

M. A.

Zeitz

G. J.

(2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. The Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134387

The Institutional Framework of Public Versus Private Capital Funding

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References