Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this commentary, we revisit Fezzey et al’s Talk-Action matrix. While acknowledging its merits for advancing extant understandings of CEO activism, we contend that the Talk-Action matrix would be further enriched by accounting for CEO agency. Indeed, CEOs are not merely reactionaries to public debates on contentious social and moral issues as is assumed by the matrix; on the contrary, CEOs are active participants in creating or shaping the rhetorical contests in which they participate or intervene. CEO activism is inherently representative of agentic acts wherein CEOs both authorize the discourses they support and legitimate it using the generative power ascribed to their corporate role and social status. In sum, CEOs are significant players in establishing what ought to be considered socially (un)acceptable or morally urgent.

Keywords

discourse action talk

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barley

S. R.

(2010). Building an institutional field to corral a government: A case to set an agenda for organization studies. Organization Studies, 31(7), 777–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610372572

Barros

Wanderley

(2020). Brazilian businessmen movements: Right-wing populism and the (dis)connection between policy and politics. Organization, 27(3), 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419883378

Bloom

Rhodes

(2018). CEO society: The corporate takeover of everyday life. Zed Books.

Cornelissen

J. P.

Durand

Fiss

P. C.

Lammers

J. C.

Vaara

(2015). Putting communication front and center in institutional theory and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 10–27. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0381

Culpepper

P. D.

(2021). Quiet politics in tumultuous times: Business power, populism, and democracy. Politics & Society, 49(1), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329220985725

Ferns

Amaeshi

(2021). Fueling climate (in)action: How organizations engage in hegemonization to avoid transformational action on climate change. Organization Studies, 42(7), 1005–1029. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619855744

Fezzey

T. N. A.

Drnevich

P. L.

Borgholthaus

C. J.

(2025). Damned if you do and damned if you don’t: A theoretical examination and extension of CEO activism. Group & Organization Management, 50(2), 632–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011241308618

Fischer

(2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University Press.

Levy

Scully

(2007). The institutional entrepreneur as modern prince: The strategic face of power in contested fields. Organization Studies, 28(7), 971–991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607078109

10.

Masood

Nisar

M. A.

(2019). Speaking out: A postcolonial critique of the academic discourse on far-right populism. Organization, 27(1), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419828572

11.

Mayer

(2016). Dark money: The hidden history of the billionaires behind the rise of the radical right. Doubleday.

12.

Poruthiyil

P. V.

(2021). Big business and fascism: A dangerous collusion. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(1), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04259-9

13.

Prasad

(2020). The organization of ideological discourse in times of unexpected crisis: Explaining how COVID-19 is exploited by populist leaders. Leadership, 16(3), 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715020926783

14.

Reed

M. I.

(2012). Masters of the universe: Power and elites in organization studies. Organization Studies, 33(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611430590

15.

Rhodes

(2023). Woke capitalism: How corporate morality is sabotaging democracy. Bristol University Press.

16.

Vaara

Whittle

(2022). Common sense, new sense or non-sense? A critical discursive perspective on power in collective sensemaking. Journal of Management Studies, 59(3), 755–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12783

17.

Zulfiqar

Prasad

(2022). How is social inequality maintained in the global south? Critiquing the concept of dirty work. Human Relations, 75(11), 2160–2186. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221097937

A Commentary on Fezzey et al. (2025): CEO Activism as Discursive Agentic Acts

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References