ChiuW. T.ArnoldJ.ShihY. T.HsiungK. H.ChiH. Y.ChiuC. H.HuangW. C. (2002). A survey of international urban search‐and‐rescue teams following the Ji Ji earthquake. Disasters, 26(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00193
2.
ChungB. G.EhrhartK. H.ShoreL. M.RandelA. E.DeanM. A.KedharnathU. (2020). Work group inclusion: Test of a scale and model. Group & Organization Management, 45(1), 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601119839858
3.
DavisJ. P.EisenhardtK. M.BinghamC. B. (2007). Developing theory through simulation methods. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 480–499. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351453
FalkA.HeckmanJ. J. (2009). Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science, 326(5952), 535–538. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168244
6.
FlynnP. J.KirkmanB. L.McFarlandL. A.PollackJ. M. (2024). When does entrepreneurs’ impression management enhance their networking performance? The cross-level moderating role of collective altruism. Group & Organization Management.
7.
Fuster-ParraP.García-MasA.PonsetiF. J.LeoF. M. (2015). Team performance and collective efficacy in the dynamic psychology of competitive team: A bayesian network analysis. Human Movement Science, 40(1), 98–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2014.12.005
8.
Garrett-BakelmanF. E.DarshiM.GreenS. J.GurR. C.LinL.MaciasB. R.TurekF. W. (2019). The NASA twins study: A multidimensional analysis of a year-long human spaceflight. Science, 364(6436), eaau8650. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau8650
9.
GoemaereS.Van CaelenbergT.BeyersW.BinstedK.VansteenkisteM. (2019). Life on mars from a Self-Determination Theory perspective: How astronauts' needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness go hand in hand with crew health and mission success-Results from HI-SEAS IV. Acta Astronautica, 159, 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.059
10.
GormanJ. C.CookeN. J.AmazeenP. G.FouseS. (2012). Measuring patterns in team interaction sequences using a discrete recurrence approach. Human Factors, 54(4), 503–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811426140
11.
HaddadG.O’ConnorD.BurnsK. (2022). Unleashing the power of athlete leadership groups: Strategies perceived to leverage the potential of shared leadership in professional football teams. International Sport Coaching Journal, 1(aop), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2021-0051
12.
HarrisonJ. R.LinZ.CarrollG. R.CarleyK. M. (2007). Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1229–1245. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586485
JanssensM.van der BruggenS. S. C. P.MeslecN.BeerepootL. S.LeendersR. (2024). The impact of workflow interruptions on multidisciplinary team communication in hybrid healthcare settings. Group & Organization Management.
15.
JohnsonA. R.Van de SchootR.DelmarF.CranoW. D. (2015). Social influence interpretation of interpersonal processes and team performance over time using Bayesian model selection. Journal of Management, 41(2), 574–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314539351
16.
KaneA.EmichK. (2024). The value of small samples to groups and teams research: Accumulating knowledge across philosophies of science. Group & Organization Management.
17.
KäosaarA.BurkeC. S. (2024). The effect of challenge characteristics on teamwork and affective states in ICE. Group & Organization Management.
18.
KennedyD. M.McCombS. A. (2014). When teams shift among processes: Insights from simulation and optimization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 784–815. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037339
19.
KimT.McFeeE.OlguinD. O.WaberB.PentlandA. S. (2012). Sociometric badges: Using sensor technology to capture new forms of collaboration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(3), 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1776
20.
KlonekF.TwemlowM.TimsM.ParkerS. (2024). It’s about time! Understanding the dynamic team process-performance relationship using micro- and macroscale time lenses. Group & Organization Management.
21.
KnightA. P. (2018). Innovations in unobtrusive methods. In BrymanA.BuchananD. A. (Eds.), Unconventional methodology in organization and management research (pp. 64–83).
22.
KozlowskiS. W.ChaoG. T.GrandJ. A.BraunM. T.KuljaninG. (2016). Capturing the multilevel dynamics of emergence: Computational modeling, simulation, and virtual experimentation. Organizational Psychology Review, 6(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386614547955
23.
KozlowskiS. W.WatolaD. J.JensenJ. M.KimB. H.BoteroI. C. (2008). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of dynamic team leadership. In Team effectiveness in complex organizations (pp. 147–190). Routledge.
24.
KuhnT. I. M.PooleM. S. (2000). Do conflict management styles affect group decision making? Evidence from a longitudinal field study. Human Communication Research, 26(4), 558–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00769.x
25.
LandonL. B.SlackK. J.BarrettJ. D. (2018). Teamwork and collaboration in long-duration space missions: Going to extremes. American Psychologist, 73(4), 563. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000260
26.
LeendersR. T. A.ContractorN. S.DeChurchL. A. (2016). Once upon a time: Understanding team processes as relational event networks. Organizational Psychology Review, 6(1), 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386615578312
27.
LeonG. R.SandalG. M.FinkB. A.CiofaniP. (2011). Positive experiences and personal growth in a two-man North Pole expedition team. Environment and Behavior, 43(5), 710–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510375039
28.
LillieE. O.PatayB.DiamantJ.IssellB.TopolE. J.SchorkN. J. (2011). The n-of-1 clinical trial: The ultimate strategy for individualizing medicine?Personalized Medicine, 8(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.2217/pme.11.7
29.
LungeanuA.DeChurchL. A.ContractorN. S. (2023). A tole of three teams: Effect of long-term isolation in SIRIUS-21 on crew interpersonal networks. Acta Astronautica, 212(1), 617–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.08.015
30.
Marques-QuinteiroP.SchmutzJ.AntinoM.EppichW.MaynardM. T. (2024). Event characteristics and team adaptation in extreme contexts: Evidence from an Antarctic summer campaign. Group & Organization Management.
31.
MathieuJ.MaynardM. T.RappT.GilsonL. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063083160
32.
MathieuJ. E.AguinisH.CulpepperS. A.ChenG. (2012). Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 951–966. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028380
33.
MathieuJ. E.GallagherP. T.DomingoM. A.KlockE. A. (2019). Embracing complexity: Reviewing the past decade of team effectiveness research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6(1), 17–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015106
34.
MaynardM. T.ConroyS.LacerenzaC. N.BarnesL. Y. (2021). Teams in the wild are not extinct, but challenging to research: A guide for conducting impactful team field research with 10 recommendations and 10 best practices. Organizational Psychology Review, 11(3), 274–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386620986597
35.
MaynardM. T.KennedyD. M.ResickC. J. (2018). Teamwork in extreme environments: Lessons, challenges, and opportunities. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(6), 695–700. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2302
36.
MaynardM. T.KennedyD. M.SommerS. A. (2015). Team adaptation: A fifteen-year synthesis (1998–2013) and framework for how this literature needs to “adapt” going forward. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 24(5), 652–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.1001376
37.
MaynardM. T.MathieuJ. E.GilsonL. L.SanchezD.DeanM. D. (2019). Do I really know you and does it matter? Unpacking the relationship between familiarity and information elaboration in global virtual teams. Group & Organization Management, 44(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601118785842
38.
MorgesonF. P.MitchellT. R.LiuD. (2015). Event system theory: An event-oriented approach to the organizational sciences. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0099
39.
OlenickJ.EgglerK.BowkerJ.KozlowskiS. W. J.ChangC. H.SomarajuA. V.GriffinD. J. (2024). A qualitative investigation of teamwork in extreme environments. Group & Organization Management.
40.
RenY.CarleyK. M.ArgoteL. (2006). The contingent effects of transactive memory: When is it more beneficial to know what others know?Management Science, 52(5), 671–682. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0496
41.
RohH.ChunK.RyouY.SonJ. (2019). Opening the black box: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of top management team diversity on emergent team processes and multilevel contextual influence. Group & Organization Management, 44(1), 112–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601118799475
42.
SalasE.TannenbaumS. I.KozlowskiS. W.MillerC. A.MathieuJ. E.VesseyW. B. (2015). Teams in space exploration: A new frontier for the science of team effectiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414566448
43.
Salom MartorellM.Núñez PratsA.PonsetiF. J.García-MasA. (2020). Relationship between competitive anxiety and sporting cooperation on competition sailing teams. Pensamiento Psicológico, 18(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.11144/javerianacali.ppsi18-2.racc
44.
Smith-JentschK. A.Cannon-BowersJ. A.TannenbaumS. I.SalasE. (2008). Guided team self-correction: Impacts on team mental models, processes, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 39(3), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496408317794
TannenbaumS. I.MathieuJ. E.SalasE.CohenD. (2012). On teams: Unifying themes and a way ahead. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01406.x
47.
van VeelenR.UfkesE. G. (2019). Teaming up or down? A multisource study on the role of team identification and learning in the team diversity–performance link. Group & Organization Management, 44(1), 38–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601117750532
48.
WagstaffC. R.WestonN. J. (2014). Examining emotion regulation in an isolated performance team in Antarctica. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 3(4), 273. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000022
49.
WeickK. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628–652. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393339
50.
WestM. A.TjosvoldD.SmithK. G. (Eds.), (2008). International handbook of organizational teamwork and cooperative working. John Wiley & Sons.
51.
ZijlstraF. R.WallerM. J.PhillipsS. I. (2012). Setting the tone: Early interaction patterns in swift-starting teams as a predictor of effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(5), 749–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.690399