AlyM.ColungaE.CrockettM. J.GoldrickM.GomezP.KungF. Y. H.McKeeP. C.PérezM.StilwellS. M.DiekmanA. B. (2023). Changing the culture of peer review for a more inclusive and equitable psychological science. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(12), 3546–3565. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001461
3.
BaruchY.KonradA.AguinisH.StarbuckW. (2008). Opening the black box of editorship. Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BaruchY.SullivanS. E.SchepmyerH. N. (Eds.), (2006). Winning reviews: A guide for evaluating scholarly writing. Palgrave-Macmillan.
5.
BlieseP. (2020). Taking the AE’s perspective: Insights into seemingly irrational decisions. Journal of Management Inquiry, 29(4), 374–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492619886034
ButterwickD. J.HagelB.NelsonD. S.LeFaveM. R.MeeuwisseW. H. (2002). Epidemiologic analysis of injury in five years of Canadian professional rodeo. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 30(2), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465020300020801
8.
ByronK. (2024). Editor’s comments: Taking steps to level the playing field. Academy of Management Review, 49(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2023.0376
ClarkT.WrightM.KetchenD. (Eds.), (2019). How to get published in the best management journals. Edward Elgar.
11.
DaftR. L. (1995). Why I recommended that your manuscript be rejected and what you can do about it. In CummingsL. L.FrostP. J. (Eds.), Publishing in the organizational sciences (pp. 164–182). Sage.
12.
DeCellesK. A.LeslieL. M.ShawJ. D. (2019). From the editors—disciplinary code switching at AMJ: The tale of Goldilocks and the three journals. Academy of Management Journal, 62(3), 635–640. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.4003
13.
FaemsD.HannahD. R. (2018). A retrospective examination of a successful developmental reviewing process. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(2), 144–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617726712
FisherG.ThatcherS. M. B.MakadokR. (2023). The AMR origins series: Demystifying the theory-building process. Academy of Management Review, 48(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2023.0001
16.
GardnerW. L. (2020). Why I rejected your R&R submission and what you could have done to secure an acceptance. Journal of Management Inquiry, 29(4), 378–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492619889683
17.
GruberM. (2023). From the editors—an innovative journal during transformational times: Embarking on the 23rd editorial term. Academy of Management Journal, 66(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-023-09492-1
18.
KöhlerT.González-MoralesM. G.BanksG. C.O’BoyleE. H.AllenJ. A.SinhaR.WooS. E.GulickL. M. (2020). Supporting robust, rigorous, and reliable reviewing as the cornerstone of our profession: Introducing a competency framework for peer review. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 13(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2019.121
19.
MillerC. C.Van de VenA. H. (2015). Peer review, root canals, and other amazing life events. Academy of Management Discoveries, 1(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2015.0039
20.
RaginsB. R. (2017). Editor’s comments: Raising the bar for developmental reviewing. Academy of Management Review, 42(4), 573–576. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0464
21.
RaginsB. R. (2018). From boxing to dancing: Creating a developmental editorial culture. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(2), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617726273
22.
RynesS. L. (2006). Observations on “Anatomy of an R&R” and other reflections. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20786056
Vogelgesang LesterG. (2020). Congratulations, you got a revise and resubmit! Now what? The impetus behind and lessons learned from a successful years-long PDW focused on the peer review revision process. Journal of Management Inquiry, 29(4), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492619882508