Taking a multi-level perspective on the psychological contract (PC), this study investigates the overlooked but critical role of team psychological contract fulfillment in shaping team and individual-level affect and outcomes. It examines the dynamics associated with employer PC Fulfillment (PCF) to the team and compares them to the dynamics regarding employer PCF of the individual’s own psychological contract. Guided by psychological contracts and self-regulation theories, we surveyed 504 individuals in 69 retail organization teams at two time periods. At the team level, findings support an indirect effect of team PCF on both team engagement and average turnover intention through affective climate. Similarly, at the individual level, we find an indirect effect of individual PCF on both engagement and turnover intentions through individual affect. Tests of scalar and configural similarity across levels support functional isomorphism between individual and team PCF relationships with engagement, while turnover intention is more highly related to individual than to team PCF. Last, we observe cross-level effects of team PCF on the relationship between individual PCF and turnover intentions. We present implications for multi-level PC theory, research, and practice.
AguinisH.GottfredsonR. K.CulpepperS. A. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1490–1528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478188
2.
AkkermansJ.De JongS.De JongJ.BalP. M. (2019). Me and my team: The role of social context in psychological contract breach and fulfilment. In GriepY.CooperC. (eds.) Handbook of Research on the Psychological Contract at Work. Edward Elgar Publishing.
3.
AlcoverC.-M.RicoR.TurnleyW. H.BolinoM. C. (2017). Understanding the changing nature of psychological contracts in 21st century organizations: A multiple-foci exchange relationships approach and proposed framework. Organizational Psychology Review, 7(1), 4–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386616628333
4.
ArendM. G.SchäferT. (2019). Statistical power in two-level models: A tutorial based on Monte Carlo simulation. Psychological Methods, 24(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000195
5.
BagozziR. P.EdwardsJ. R. (1998). A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 45–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100104
BartelC. A.SaavedraR. (2000). The collective construction of work group moods. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 197–231. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667070
8.
BaruchY.RousseauD. M. (2019). Integrating psychological contracts and ecosystems in career studies and management. The Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 84–111. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0103
9.
BashshurM. R.HernándezA.González-RomáV. (2011). When managers and their teams disagree: A longitudinal look at the consequences of differences in perceptions of organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 558–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022675
10.
BlauP. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. Transaction Publishers.
11.
BlieseP. D. (1998). Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: A simulation. Organizational Research Methods, 1(4), 355–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819814001
12.
BlieseP. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. J. (eds.) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations. Jossey-Bass, 349–381.
13.
BlieseP. D.MaltarichM. A.HendricksJ. L. (2018). Back to basics with mixed-effects models: Nine take-away points. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9491-z
14.
BordiaP.RestubogS. L. D.BordiaS.TangR. L. (2010). Breach begets breach: Trickle-down effects of psychological contract breach on customer service. Journal of Management, 36(6), 1578–1607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310378366
15.
BrislinR. N. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. Sage Publications.
16.
ByrneZ. S.PetersJ. M.WestonJ. W. (2016). The Struggle with employee engagement: Measures and construct clarification using five samples. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(9), 1201–1227. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000124
17.
CammannC.FichmanM.JenkinsD.KleshJ. R. (1983). Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. In SeashoreS. E.LawlerE. E.MirvisP. H.CammannC. (eds.) Assessing Organizational Change: A Guide to Methods, Measures, and Practices. Wiley (pp. 71–138).
18.
ChanD. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234
19.
ChenG.BlieseP. D.MathieuJ. E. (2005). Conceptual framework and statistical procedures for delineating and testing multilevel theories of homology. Organizational Research Methods, 8(4), 375–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105280056
20.
ChinP. L.HungM. L. (2013). Psychological contract breach and turnover intention: The moderating roles of adversity quotient and gender. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 41(5), 843–859. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2013.41.5.843
21.
CollinsA. L.LawrenceS. A.TrothA.JordanP. (2013). Group affective tone: A review and future research directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(S1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1887
22.
ColquittJ. A.NoeR. A.JacksonC. L. (2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00104.x
23.
ConwayN.PekcanC. (2019). Psychological contract research: Older, but is it wiser? In Handbook of research on the psychological contract at work (pp. 10–34).
24.
CruzK. S.ZagenczykT. J.HoodA. C. (2020). Aggregate perceptions of intrateam conflict and individual team member perceptions of team psychological contract breach: The moderating role of individual team member perceptions of team support. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 36(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2020a7
25.
CuyperN.WitteH. (2006). The impact of job insecurity and contract type on attitudes, well‐being and behavioural reports: A psychological contract perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(3), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905x53660
26.
DabosG. E.RousseauD. M. (2004). Mutuality and reciprocity in the psychological contracts of employees and employers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.52
27.
DabosG. E.RousseauD. M. (2013). Psychological contracts and informal networks in organizations: The effects of social status and local ties. Human Resource Management, 52(4), 485–510. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21540
28.
De JongB.GillespieN.WilliamsonI.GillC. (2021). Trust consensus within culturally diverse teams: A multistudy investigation. Journal of Management, 47(8), 2135–2168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320943658
29.
EchterhoffG. (2012). Shared-reality theory. In Van LangeP. A.KruglanskiA. W.E. T. (eds.) Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (vol. 2). Sage publications Ltd.
30.
Francoeur-MarquisC.AubéC. (2021). Supportive organizational context for teams: A study of construct validity. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 57(3), 350–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886320917189
31.
GameroN.González‐RomáV.PeiróJ. M. (2008). The influence of intra‐team conflict on work teams' affective climate: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317907x180441
32.
GlissonC.JamesL. R. (2002). The cross-level effects of culture and climate in human service teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 767–794. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.162
33.
GongY.KimT. Y.LeeD. R.ZhuJ. (2013). A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 827–851. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0177
34.
HarrisonD. A.KleinK. J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586096
HayesA. F.RockwoodN. J. (2020). Conditional process analysis: Concepts, computation, and advances in the modeling of the contingencies of mechanisms. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(1): 19–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219859633
37.
HigginsE. T. (2019). Shared reality: What makes us strong and tears us apart. Oxford University Press.
38.
HoV. T. (2005). Social influence on evaluations of psychological contract fulfillment. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.15281438
39.
HoV. T.LevesqueL. L. (2005). With a little help from My Friends (and Substitutes): Social referents and influence in psychological contract fulfillment. Organization Science, 16(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0121
40.
HofmannD. A. (2002). Issues in multilevel research: Theory development, measurement, and analysis. In RogelbergS. G. (Ed.) Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology. Blackwell. 247–274.
41.
HofmannD. A.GavinM. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24(5), 623–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063(99)80077-4
42.
HouleS. A.RichB. L.ComeauC. A.BlaisA. R.MorinA. J. (2022). The job engagement scale: Development and validation of a Short form in English and French. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37(5), 877–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-021-09782-z
JohnsG. (2018). Advances in the treatment of context in organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104406
46.
KozlowskiS. W.IlgenD. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 7(3), 77–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x
47.
KozlowskiS. W.KleinK. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. (eds) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations. Jossey-Bass. 3–90.
48.
Kristof-BrownA.SeongJ. Y.DegeestD. S.ParkW.-W.HongD.-S. (2014). Retracted: Collective fit perceptions: A multilevel investigation of person–group fit with individual‐level and team‐level outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(7), 969–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1942
49.
LandisR. S.BealD. J.TeslukP. E. (2000). A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 3(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810032003
50.
LauD. C.MurnighanJ. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533229
51.
LauliéL. (2017). Toward a better understanding of psychological contract fulfillment (PCF) at the team level. Doctoral dissertation. Wayne State University.
52.
LauliéL. (2023, September 6). Psychological Contracts at Different Levels. Retrieved from osf.io/uzya4.
53.
LauliéL.TekleabA. G. (2016). A multi-level theory of psychological contract fulfillment in teams. Group & Organization Management, 41(5), 658–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601116668972
54.
LeBretonJ. M.SenterJ. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642
55.
LeeC.LiuJ.RousseauD. M.HuiC.ChenZ. X. (2011). Evolving psychological contracts of new graduates in China: The influence of fulfillment, employer rewards and worker contributions over time. Human Resource Management, 50(2), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20415
56.
LiaoH.RuppD. E. (2005). The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: A cross-level multifoci framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.242
57.
LittleT. D.RhemtullaM.GibsonK.SchoemannA. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033266
MathieuJ.MaynardM. T.RappT.GilsonL. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316061
60.
MathieuJ. E.AguinisH.CulpepperS. A.ChenG. (2012). Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 951–966. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028380
61.
MeroN. P.GuidiceR. M.WernerS. (2014). A field study of the antecedents and performance consequences of perceived accountability. Journal of Management, 40(6), 1627–1652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312441208
62.
MorgesonF. P.HofmannD. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.2307/259081
63.
MoussaidM.GarnierS.TheraulazG.HelbingD. (2009). Collective information processing and pattern formation in swarms, flocks, and crowds. Topics in cognitive science, 1(3), 469–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01028.x
64.
NicholsonN.JohnsG. (1985). The absence culture and psychological contract—who's in control of absence?Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 397–407. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4278945
65.
ParkG.SpitzmullerM.DeShonR. P. (2013). Advancing our understanding of team motivation: Integrating conceptual approaches and content Areas. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1339–1379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471389
66.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.AhearneM. (1997). Moderating effects of goal acceptance on the relationship between group cohesiveness and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 974–983. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.374
67.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
68.
PriesemuthM.SchminkeM.AmbroseM. L.FolgerR. (2014). Abusive supervision climate: A multiple-mediation model of its impact on group outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1513–1534. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0237
69.
RichB. L.LepineJ. A.CrawfordE. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468988
70.
RobersonQ. M.WilliamsonI. O. (2012). Justice in self-managing teams: The role of social networks in the emergence of procedural justice climates. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 685–701. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0491
71.
RobertsK. H.HulinC. L.RousseauD. M. (1978). Developing an interdisciplinary science of organizations. Jossey-Bass Incorporated Pub.
RousseauD. M. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. In CummingsL. L.StawB. (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior (vol. 7, pp. 1–37).
74.
RousseauD. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Sage Publications.
75.
RousseauD. M. (2000). Psychological contract inventory (No. 2000-02). Technical report. Boston: British Library.
76.
RousseauD. M.HansenS. D.TomprouM. (2018). A dynamic phase model of psychological contract processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(9), 1081–1098. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2284
77.
RousseauD. M.SitkinS. B.BurtR. S.CamererC. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617
78.
SalancikG. R.PfefferJ. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392563
79.
SchalkR.De RuiterM. (2019). Mutuality and reciprocity in the psychological contract: A critical review and analysis. In Handbook of research on the psychological contract at work (pp. 35–62). Edward Elgar Publishing.
80.
ScheierM. F.CarverC. S. (1980). Private and public self-attention, resistance to change, and dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(3), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.390
81.
SchneiderB.SalvaggioA. N.SubiratsM. (2002). Climate strength: A new direction for climate research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.220
82.
SchreuderF.SchalkR.BatističS. (2020). Examining team performance: The role of psychological contracts and engagement among coworkers. Evidence-based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 8(3), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebhrm-03-2020-0029
83.
TekleabA. G.LauliéL.De VosA.De JongJ. P.Coyle-ShapiroJ. A. (2020). Contextualizing psychological contracts research: A multi-sample study of shared individual psychological contract fulfilment. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 29(2), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2019.1608294
84.
VantilborghT.BideeJ.PepermansR.WillemsJ.HuybrechtsG.JegersM. (2014). Effects of ideological and relational psychological contract breach and fulfilment on volunteers’ work effort. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 23(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2012.740170
85.
VidyarthiP. R.SinghS.ErdoganB.ChaudhryA.PosthumaR.AnandS. (2016). Individual deals within teams: Investigating the role of relative i-deals for employee performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(11), 1536–1552. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000145
WeinerB. (1986). Attribution, emotion, and action. In SorrentinoR. M.HigginsE. T. (eds.) Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 281–312). Guilford Press.
88.
WiewioraA.SmidtM.ChangA. (2019). The ‘how’ of multilevel learning dynamics: A systematic literature review exploring how mechanisms bridge learning between individuals, teams/projects and the organization. European Management Review, 16(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12179
Zellmer-BruhnM.GibsonC. (2006). Multinational organization context: Implications for team learning and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794668
91.
ZhaoH. A. O.WayneS. J.GlibkowskiB. C.BravoJ. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A Meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 647–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00087.x
