BergeronD.RochfordK. (2022). Good soldiers versus organizational wives: Does anyone (besides us) care that organizational citizenship behavior scales are gendered and mostly measure men’s—but not women’s—citizenship behavior?Group & Organization Management, online first.https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221094421
2.
BernerthJ. B.WalkerH. J. (2020). Altered states or much to do about nothing? A study of when cannabis is used in relation to the impact it has on performance. Group & Organization Management, 45(4), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601120917590
3.
Buljac-SamardzicM.Dekker-van DoornC.MaynardM. T. (2018). Teamwork and teamwork training in health care: An integration and a path forward. Group & Organization Management, 43(3), 351–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601118774669
4.
CropanzanoR.PreharC. A.ChenP. Y. (2002). Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group & Organization Management, 27(3), 324–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601102027003002
5.
CruzK. S. (2021). Does anyone care about external validity? A call (or plea?) for more OB/HR research from multiple organizations/industries, panels, and publicly available datasets. Group & Organization Management, 46(6), 974–983. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211055879
6.
CruzK. S. (2022). Are you asking the correct person (hint: Oftentimes you are not!)? Stop worrying about unfounded common method bias arguments and start using my guide to make better decisions of when to use self-and other-reports. Group & Organization Management, online first. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221103068
7.
FeldmanE.GreenwayD. (2021). It’s a matter of time: The role of temporal perceptions in emotional experiences of work interruptions. Group & Organization Management, 46(1), 70–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601120959288
8.
FlynnP. J.BlieseP. D.KorsgaardM. A.CannonC. (2021). Tracking the process of resilience: How emotional stability and experience influence exhaustion and commitment trajectories. Group & Organization Management, 46(4), 692–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211027676
9.
GriepY.GermeysL.KraakJ. M. (2021). Unpacking the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior: Moral licensing and temporal focus. Group & Organization Management, 46(5), 819–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601121995366
10.
JunkerN. M.van DickR.HäusserJ. A.EllwartT.ZyphurM. J. (2022). The I and We of team identification: A multilevel study of exhaustion and (in) congruence among individuals and teams in team identification. Group & Organization Management, 47(1), 41–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211004789
KesslerS. R.ShossM. K. (2022). Archival data sets should not be a secondary (or even last) choice in micro-organizational research. Group & Organization Management, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221112521
13.
LauliéL.TekleabA. G. (2016). A multi-level theory of psychological contract fulfillment in teams. Group & Organization Management, 41(5), 658–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601116668972
14.
LohrkeF. T.LandströmH. (2016). Young, small, and imprintable: Assessing progress and exploring future directions in new venture and small business research. Group & Organization Management, 41(6), 703–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601116672390
15.
MackeyJ. D.McAllisterC. P. (2022). Musing about interdisciplinary research: Ss interdisciplinary research amusing or bemusing?Group & Organization Management, online first. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221093942
16.
NishiiL. H.LeroyH. (2022). A multi-level framework of inclusive leadership in Organizations. Group & Organization Management, 47(4), 683–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221111505
17.
O’BoyleE. H.ForsythD. R.O’BoyleA. S. (2011). Bad apples or bad barrels: An examination of group-and organizational-level effects in the study of counterproductive work behavior. Group & Organization Management, 36(1), 39–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601110390998
18.
RaetzeS.DuchekS.MaynardM. T.KirkmanB. L. (2021). Resilience in organizations: An integrative multilevel review and editorial introduction. Group & Organization Management, 46(4), 607–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211032129
19.
RappT. L.DavisW. D.GilsonL. L. (2022). The 2022 conceptual issue: Highlighting the individual, team, and organizational building blocks of effective organizations, Group & Organization Management, 47(2), 143–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221089718
20.
RiceD. B. (2022). The word on the street: Science is not advocacy, but publishing research is. Group & Organization Management, online first. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221097807
ShermanU. P.MorleyM. J. (2015). On the formation of the psychological contract: A schema theory perspective. Group & Organization Management, 40(2), 160–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115574944
23.
ShossM. K.HoranK. A.DiStasoM.LeNobleC. A.NaranjoA. (2021). The conflicting impact of COVID-19’s health and economic crises on helping. Group & Organization Management, 46(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601120968704
24.
WatsonG. P.KistlerL. D.GrahamB. A.SinclairR. R. (2021). Looking at the gig picture: Defining gig work and explaining profile differences in gig workers’ job demands and resources. Group & Organization Management, 46(2), 327–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601121996548
25.
WieseC. W.BurkeC. S.TangY.HernandezC.HowellR. (2022). Team learning behaviors and performance: A meta-analysis of direct effects and moderators. Group & Organization Management, 47(3), 571–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211016928
