Restricted accessOtherFirst published online 2022-10
Are You Asking the Correct Person (Hint: Oftentimes You are Not!)? Stop Worrying About Unfounded Common Method Bias Arguments and Start Using My Guide to Make Better Decisions of When to Use Self- and Other-Reports
BerryC. M.CarpenterN. C.BarrattC. L. (2012). Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 613–636. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026739
2.
BozionelosN.SimmeringM. J. (2022). Methodological threat or myth? Evaluating the current state of evidence on common method variance in human resource management research. Human Resource Management Journal, 32(1), 194–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12398
3.
CarpenterN. C.BerryC. M.HoustonL. (2014). A meta-analytic comparison of self-reported and other-reported organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(4), 547–574. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1909
4.
CarpenterN. C.RangelB.JeonG.CottrellJ. (2017). Are supervisors and coworkers likely to witness employee counterproductive work behavior? An investigation of observability and self-observer convergence. Personnel Psychology, 70(4), 843–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12210
5.
ConnellyB. S.OnesD. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1092–1122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021212
6.
CruzK. S.ZagenczykT. J.HoodA. C. (2020). Aggregate perceptions of intrateam conflict and individual team member perceptions of team psychological contract breach: The moderating role of individual team member perceptions of team support. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 36(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2020a7
7.
CruzK. S.ZagenczykT. J.ScottK. L.PurvisR. L. (2022). Perceptions of co-worker exclusion and performance outcomes: Are different forms of support helpful or hurtful?Journal of Management & Organization, 28, 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.56
8.
JohnO. P.RobinsR. W. (1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality, 61(4), 521–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00781.x
9.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
10.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
11.
SpectorP. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Trust or urban legend?Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284955
12.
SpectorP. E. (2019). Do not cross me: Optimizing the use of cross-sectional designs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8
13.
VazireS. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017908
